On the Advantage of Adaptivity for Sampling with Cell Probes

2026-05-13T01:36:59Z

We construct an explicit distribution $\mathbf{D}$ over $\{0,1\}^N$ that exhibits an essentially optimal separation between adaptive and non-adaptive cell-probe sampling. The distribution can be sampled exactly when each output bit is allowed two adaptive probes to an arbitrarily long sequence of independent uniform symbols from $[N]$. In contrast, any non-adaptive sampler requires $\widetildeΩ(N)$ non-adaptive cell probes to generate a distribution with total variation distance less than $1-o(1)$ from $\mathbf{D}$. This provides a $2$-vs-$\widetildeΩ(N)$ separation for sampling with adaptive versus non-adaptive cell probes, improving upon the $2$-vs-$\widetildeΩ(\log N)$ separation of Yu and Zhan (ITCS '24) and the $(\log N)^{O(1)}$-vs-$N^{Ω(1)}$ separation of Alekseev, Göös, Myasnikov, Riazanov, and Sokolov (STOC '26).

The Distributed Complexity Landscape on Trees Depends on the Knowledge About the Network Size

2026-05-12T22:02:21Z

One of the central models in distributed computing is Linial's LOCAL model [SIAM J. Comp. 1992]. Over time, researchers have studied distributed graph problems in the LOCAL model under slightly different assumptions, such as whether nodes know the exact network size $n$, only a polynomial upper bound on $n$, or nothing at all. We ask whether these differences are merely technical or fundamentally affect the theory of Locally Checkable Labelings (LCLs), one of the most studied problem classes. LCLs are graph problems whose valid solutions can be characterized by a finite set of allowed constant-radius neighborhoods. Since their introduction by Naor and Stockmeyer [FOCS 1995], they have become central in distributed computing, and the last decade has seen major progress in understanding their complexity. For example, Chang, Kopelowitz, and Pettie [FOCS 2016] showed that the randomized complexity of any LCL on $n$-node graphs is at least its deterministic complexity on $\sqrt{\log n}$-node graphs. Later, Chang and Pettie [FOCS 2017] showed that any randomized $n^{o(1)}$-round algorithm for LCLs on bounded-degree trees can be turned into a deterministic $O(\log n)$-round algorithm. Then, Balliu et al. [STOC 2018] showed that such automatic speedups are impossible for general bounded-degree graphs. However, these results fundamentally rely on nodes knowing $n$. How much does this assumption affect the theory of LCLs? Our work shows that if nodes are oblivious to $n$, or know only a polynomial upper bound on it, then even on trees, the theory of LCLs changes significantly. While the fundamental classification of problems remains the same, we show the landscape becomes much more complex: for example, for LCLs, randomness helps in more cases; some problems have very unnatural complexities; and some have a lower bound that depends on which definition of $Ω$ we use!

On P Versus NP

2026-05-12T20:08:16Z

It is shown that graph-theoretic problem CLIQUE can't be solved in polynomial time by any deterministic TM. This upgrades the well-known partial result that claims only monotone unsolvability thereof, and eventually implies P $\neq$ NP as CLIQUE is NP-complete. This paper essentially simplifies my previous presentation that used more complex models of computation based on standard Boolean semantics while fixing technical errors spotted by a generic proof assistant Isabelle that has been implemented by René Thiemann.

Proofs of NP = coNP = PSPACE: Current upgrade

2026-05-12T19:55:38Z

In this paper we present a more transparent upgrade of our proofs and comment on Jerabek's paper [8].

Optimal Bounds, Barriers, and Extensions for Non-Hermitian Bivariate Quantum Signal Processing

2026-05-12T19:03:36Z

Multivariate quantum signal processing (M-QSP) has recently been shown to be applicable for non-Hermitian Hamiltonian simulation, opening several problems regarding the optimization landscape, angle-finding, and constant-factor analysis. We resolve several of these problems here. We find the anti-Hermitian query complexity $d_I = Θ(\betaI T + \log(1/\varepsilon)/\log\log(1/\varepsilon))$ to be tight, established via Chebyshev coefficient bounds, modified Bessel function asymptotics, and Lambert~$W$ inversion. Fast-forwarding to $d_I = \mathcal{O}(\sqrt{\betaI T})$ is impossible in the bivariate polynomial model, though a linear state-dependent improvement to $d_I = \mathcal{O} β_{\mathrm{eff}} T + \log(1/\varepsilon)/\log\log(1/\varepsilon))$ is achievable. The optimization landscape of M-QSP admits spurious local minima, but a warm-start basin guarantee ensures the two-stage algorithm converges. CRC-exploiting block peeling reduces angle-finding from $\mathcal{O}(d^3)$ to $\mathcal{O}(d^2)$ classical operations, and optimized error allocation yields a leading constant of approximately~$2$ relative to the information-theoretic lower bound. A constant-ratio condition extends to non-identical signal operators, enabling time-dependent non-Hermitian simulation with query complexity $\mathcal{O}(\int_0^T(\alphaR(s) + \betaI(s))\,ds + \log(1/\varepsilon)/\log\log(1/\varepsilon))$. Block-encoding overhead $e^{-2\betaI T}$ holds across all function classes within the walk-operator oracle model, and dilational methods (Schrödingerization) achieve the walk-operator barrier. A precisely characterized direct-access construction achieves the intrinsic barrier $e^{-2ωT}$ (with $ω< \betaI$ for non-commuting Hamiltonians) on a restricted domain, though extension to the full bitorus remains open.

Quantum state isomorphism problems for groups

2026-05-12T18:05:27Z

We study the computational complexity of quantum state isomorphism problems under group actions: given two quantum circuits that prepare pure or mixed states, decide whether the two states are related by a group action. This can be seen as a quantum state version of the Hidden Shift Problem, in much the same way that the State Hidden Subgroup Problem is a quantum version of the ordinary Hidden Subgroup Problem. We prove several results for this computational problem: - For the pure-state version, we show that the problem is BQP-hard for all nontrivial groups, and contained in QCMA $\cap$ QCSZK. We further obtain refined results for specific groups of interest: for abelian groups we show that the problem reduces to the state hidden subgroup problem over the generalized dihedral group; for the Clifford group, the problem is at least as hard as Graph Isomorphism under polynomial-time reductions; for the Pauli group it is BQP-complete. - For the mixed-state version, for nontrivial, finite and efficiently representable groups, the problem is QSZK-complete. - We also study a variant of this problem over an infinite group, in particular, the bosonic linear optical unitaries. We show that in the setting where the classical description of the quantum state is given in a suitable wave function representation known as the stellar representation, the problem is at least as hard as Graph Isomorphism, and is contained in NP $\cap$ SZK. Prior to our work, state isomorphism problems had only been studied for the symmetric group [LG17]. As a consequence of our results, we resolve an open question posed in [HEC25] about the existence of a quantum algorithm for the abelian state hidden subgroup problem on mixed states. We show that this problem is QSZK-hard in the worst case, thereby ruling out an efficient quantum algorithm unless QSZK = BQP.

Simulation of Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians with Bivariate Quantum Signal Processing

2026-05-12T17:40:56Z

We achieve query-optimal quantum simulations of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians $H_{\mathrm{eff}} = H_R + iH_I$, where $H_R$ is Hermitian and $H_I \succeq 0$, using a bivariate extension of quantum signal processing (QSP) with non-commuting signal operators. The algorithm encodes the interaction-picture Dyson series as a polynomial on the bitorus, implemented through a structured multivariable QSP (M-QSP) circuit. A constant-ratio condition guarantees scalar angle-finding for M-QSP circuits with arbitrary non-commuting signal operators. A degree-preserving sum-of-squares spectral factorization permits scalar complementary polynomials in two variables. Angles are deterministically calculated in a classical precomputation step, running in $\mathcal{O}(d_R \cdot d_I)$ classical operations. Operator norms $α_R\,,β_I$ contribute additively with query complexity $\mathcal{O}((α_R + β_I)T + \log(1/\varepsilon)/\log\log(1/\varepsilon))$ matching an information-theoretic lower bound in the separate-oracle model, where $H_R$ and $H_I$ are accessed through independent block encodings. The postselection success probability is $e^{-2β_I T}\|e^{-iH_{\mathrm{eff}}T}|ψ_0\rangle\|^2\cdot (1 - \mathcal{O}(\varepsilon))$, decomposing into a state-dependent factor $\|e^{-iH_{\mathrm{eff}}T}|ψ_0\rangle\|^2$ from the intrinsic barrier and an $e^{-2β_I T}$ overhead from polynomial block-encoding.

Proof Systems Based on Structured Circuits

2026-05-12T16:42:39Z

Since their introduction by Atserias, Kolaitis, and Vardi in 2004, proof systems where each line is represented by an ordered binary decision diagram (OBDD) have been intensively studied as they allow to compactly represent Boolean functions. We extend this line of work by considering representation formats that can be even more succinct than OBDDs and have gained a lot of attention in the area of knowledge compilation: sentential decision diagrams (SDDs) and deterministic structured DNNF circuits (d-SDNNFs). We show that both variants can provide strictly smaller refutations of unsatisfiable CNFs than their OBDD counterparts. Furthermore, we investigate the relative strength of these systems depending on which of the three fundamental derivation rules join, reordering, and weakening are allowed. Here we obtain several separations and identify interesting open problems. To streamline our proofs we establish a sat-to-unsat lifting theorem that might be of independent interest: it turns satisfiable CNFs that are hard to represent by SDDs and d-SDNNFs into unsatisfiable CNFs that are hard to refute in the corresponding proof system.

Residual SCI Upper Bounds And Lower Witnesses For Koopman Approximate Point Spectra In $L^p$ For $1
2026-05-12T14:14:42Z
We study residual computation of approximate point spectral sets of bounded Koopman operators $\mathcal K_F$ on $L^p(\mathcal X,ω)$, $1

Clausal Deletion Backdoors for QBF: a Parameterized Complexity Approach

2026-05-12T13:00:55Z
Determining the validity of a quantified Boolean formula (QBF) is a PSPACE-complete problem with rich expressive power. Despite interest in efficient solvers, there is, compared to problems in NP, a lack of positive theoretical results, and in the parameterized complexity setting one often has to restrict the quantifier prefix (e.g., bounding alternations) to obtain fixed parameter tractability (FPT). We propose a new parameter: the number of variables in clauses that has to be removed before reaching a tractable class (a clause covering (CC) backdoor). We are then interested in solving QBF in FPT time given a CC-backdoor of size $k$. We consider the three classical, tractable cases of QBF as base classes: Horn, 2-CNF, and linear equations. We establish W[1]-hardness for Horn but prove FPT for the others, and prove that in a precise, algebraic sense, we are only missing one important case for a full dichotomy. Our algorithms are non-trivial and depend on propagation, and Gaussian elimination, respectively, and are comparably unexplored for QBF.

Strong Inapproximability for a Promise Rank Problem

2026-05-12T05:19:43Z
Given a linear subspace of $n \times n$ matrices over $\mathbb F_{2^r}$ that is promised to contain a matrix of rank $1$, we prove that it is hard to find a matrix of rank $n^{o(1/\log \log n)}$, assuming NP doesn't have sub-exponential algorithms. In addition to being a basic problem, the hardness of this problem, even for the exact version, drove recent PCP-free inapproximability results for minimum distance and shortest vector problems concerning codes and lattices. The proof combines the concept of superposition soundness introduced by Khot and Saket with moment matrices. To produce a rank-gap of $1$ vs. $k$, the reduction runs in time $n^{O(\log k)}$. We also give another moment-matrix-based construction which runs in time $n^{O(k)}$ but works for any finite field $\mathbb F_q$.

Hardness Amplification for (Sparse) LPN

2026-05-12T03:03:30Z
We prove new hardness amplification results for Learning Parity with Noise ($\mathsf{LPN}$) and its sparse variants. In $\mathsf{LPN}_{η,n,m}$, the goal is to recover a secret $\vec s\in\mathbb{F}_2^n$ from $m$ noisy linear samples $(\vec a,b)$, where $\vec a\leftarrow \mathbb{F}_2^n$ is uniform and $b=\langle \vec a,\vec s\rangle + e$ with $e\leftarrow \mathrm{Ber}(η)$. Building on the direct-product framework introduced by Hirahara and Shimizu [HS23], we show an 'instance-fraction amplification' theorem: for any $\varepsilon,δ>0$, any algorithm that solves $\mathsf{LPN}_{η,n,m}$ with success probability $\varepsilon$ can be transformed into an algorithm that succeeds with probability $1-δ$ on a related $\mathsf{LPN}$ distribution with scaled parameters $\mathsf{LPN}_{η/k,\;n/k,\;m}$, where $ k=Θ\!\left(\frac{1}δ\log\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\right). $ Equivalently, an algorithm that solves $\mathsf{LPN}$ on a 'small fraction of instances' can be converted into an algorithm that solves $\mathsf{LPN}$ on 'almost all instances', yielding a self-amplification for a wide range of parameters. We extend the same amplification approach to $\mathsf{LPN}$ over $\mathbb{F}_q$ and to Sparse-$\mathsf{LPN}$, where each query vector $\vec a$ has exactly $σ$ nonzero entries. Together, these results establish hardness self-amplification for a broad family of $\mathsf{LPN}$-type problems, strengthening the foundations for assuming the average-case hardness of $\mathsf{LPN}$ and its sparse variants.

Feedback Set Problems on Bounded-Degree (Planar) Graphs

2026-05-12T01:55:22Z
The feedback set problems are about removing the minimum number of vertices or edges from a graph to break all its cycles. Much effort has gone into understanding their complexity on planar graphs as well as on graphs of bounded degree. We obtain a complete complexity classification for these problems on bounded-degree digraphs, including the planar case. In particular, we show that both problems are $\NP$-complete on digraphs of maximum degree three, while on planar digraphs the feedback vertex set problem is polynomial-time solvable when each vertex has either indegree at most one or outdegree at most one, and $\NP$-complete otherwise. We also give tight degree bounds for the connected feedback vertex set problem on undirected graphs, both planar and non-planar. We close the paper with a historical account of results for feedback vertex set on undirected graphs of bounded degree.

Average-Case Hardness of Binary-Encoded Clique in Proof and Communication Complexity

2026-05-11T17:59:43Z
We study the average-case hardness of establishing that a graph does not have a large clique in both proof and communication complexity. We show exponential lower bounds on the length of cutting planes and bounded-depth resolution over parities refutations of the binary encoding of clique formulas on randomly sampled dense graphs. Moreover, we show that the randomized communication complexity of finding a falsified clause in these formulas is polynomial.

The stochastic block model has the overlap graph property for modularity

2026-05-11T17:49:30Z
The overlap gap property (OGP) is a statement about the geometry of near-optimal solutions. Exhibiting OGP implies failure of a class of local algorithms; and has been observed to coincide with conjectured algorithmic limits in problems with statistical computational gap. We consider the Stochastic Block Model (SBM), where the graph has a planted partition with $k$ equal-size blocks which form the `communities', and where, for parameters $p>q$, vertices within the same community connect with probability $p$, while vertices in different communities connect with probability $q$, independently across pairs of vertices. Modularity--based clustering algorithms have become ubiquitous in applications. This article studies theoretical limits of local algorithms based on the modularity score on the SBM. We establish that modularity exhibits OGP on the SBM. This rules out a class of local algorithms based on modularity for recovery in the SBM, and shows slow mixing time for a related Markov Chain. Theoretically this is one of the few instances where OGP has been established for a `planted' model, as most such analyses to date consider the `null' model. As part of our analysis, we extend a result by Bickel and Chen 2009, who established that with high probability, the modularity optimal partition of SBM is $o(n)$ local moves away from the planted partition, where $n$ is the graph size. We show that, with high probability, any partition with modularity score sufficiently near the optimal value is close to the planted partition.