On the complexity of computing Strahler numbers

2026-06-03T20:16:28Z

It is shown that the problem of computing the Strahler number of a binary tree given as a term is complete for the circuit complexity class uniform $\mathsf{NC}^1$. For several variants, where the binary tree is given by a pointer structure or in a succinct form by a directed acyclic graph or a tree straight-line program, the complexity of computing the Strahler number is determined as well. We show that the problem of deciding whether a given context-free grammar in Chomsky normal form produces a derivation tree with a Strahler number of at least $k$ is $\mathsf{P}$-complete. If the derivation tree is restricted to be acyclic, the problem becomes $\mathsf{PSPACE}$-complete.

Exponential Quantum Space Advantage for Approximating Max-$k$SAT in the Streaming Setting

2026-06-03T19:15:20Z

In this paper, we give a one-pass quantum streaming algorithm for Max-$k$SAT that uses $\operatorname{polylog}(n)$ space and achieves a $0.7172$-approximation on instances with $n$ variables. In contrast, prior work by Chou, Golovnev, and Velusamy (FOCS 2020) implies that achieving an approximation ratio better than $\sqrt{2}/2 \approx 0.7071$ for Max-$k$SAT requires $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ space for any classical streaming algorithm. Therefore, it yields an exponential quantum space advantage for Max-$k$SAT in the streaming setting. We further give a one-pass quantum streaming algorithm for Max-2OR that uses $\operatorname{polylog}(n)$ space and achieves a $0.7425$-approximation on instances with $n$ variables. Combining with the known results, it gives a complete classification of quantum space advantages for all Boolean Max-2CSPs.

Quantum Time Lower Bounds by Permutation Invariance

2026-06-03T17:03:24Z

Tight bounds on quantum sample complexity and quantum query complexity have been known for various computational problems in the literature, whereas tight bounds on quantum time complexity (i.e., the size of quantum circuits) remain unresolved. In this paper, we provide a framework to establish lower bounds on the quantum time complexity for testing permutation-invariant properties of quantum states, via a reduction from quantum sample complexity. As an application, we obtain a series of matching lower bounds when given sample access to the input quantum states, including: 1. The SWAP test due to Buhrman, Cleve, Watrous, and de Wolf (Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001) is time-optimal to estimate the purity $\operatorname{tr}(ρ^2)$ and the inner product $\operatorname{tr}(ρσ)$. 2. The Shift test due to Ekert, Alves, Oi, Horodecki, Horodecki, and Kwek (Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002) is time-optimal to estimate the high-order functionals $\operatorname{tr}(ρ^k)$. 3. The productness tester for multipartite pure states due to Harrow and Montanaro (J. ACM 2013) is time-optimal. 4. The LMR protocol due to Lloyd, Mohseni, and Rebentrost (Nat. Phys. 2014) is time-optimal to implement the reflection operator about a pure state. 5. The samplizer due to Wang and Zhang (IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2025) is time-optimal for pure states. 6. The estimator for pure-state trace distance and fidelity due to Wang and Zhang (ICALP 2026) is time-optimal. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first method that allows us to systematically establish tight lower bounds on quantum time complexity.

Sharp Low-Degree Thresholds for Planted-vs-Planted Testing

2026-06-03T16:28:30Z

We establish the first sharp thresholds for low-degree polynomial tests in planted-vs-planted settings, where the goal is to determine with vanishing error which of two structured planted mechanisms generated the observed data. We prove matching low-degree upper and lower bounds for counting communities in the planted submatrix and planted dense subgraph models. The resulting testing threshold coincides, down to the sharp constant, with the known low-degree recovery threshold. In contrast, the task of weak testing, where the goal is to outperform random guessing, does not have a sharp threshold but rather a smooth transition, which we identify. To prove our results, we develop a framework for planted-vs-planted testing that builds on a latent-variable expansion originating in low-degree recovery and employs new methods to identify and prune non-signal contributions.

Randomized separations in black-box TFNP

2026-06-03T10:23:59Z

We study the relationship between deterministic and randomized black-box reducibility between problems in TFNP. Our main contribution is a general technique that establishes equivalence between these reducibility types from specific TFNP problems to any TFNP problem. In particular, we show that this equivalence holds for reductions from complete problems in PPP, PPAD, PPA, and $t$-PPP. In turn, it strengthens all known black-box separations, originating from these classes, to randomized separations.

Independence and Domination on Bounded-Treewidth Graphs: Integer, Rational, and Irrational Distances

2026-06-03T08:04:16Z

The distance-d variants of Independent Set and Dominating Set problems have been extensively studied from different algorithmic viewpoints. In particular, the complexity of these problems are well understood on bounded-treewidth graphs [Katsikarelis, Lampis, and Paschos, Discret. Appl. Math 2022][Borradaile and Le, IPEC 2016]: given a tree decomposition of width t, the two problems can be solved in time $d^t \cdot n^{O(1)}$ and $(2d + 1)t \cdot n^{O(1)}$, respectively. Furthermore, assuming the Strong Exponential-Time Hypothesis (SETH), the base constants are best possible in these running times: they cannot be improved to $d-ε$ and $2d+1-ε$, respectively, for any $ε > 0$. We investigate continuous versions of these problems in a setting introduced by Megiddo and Tamir [SICOMP 1983], where every edge is modeled by a unit-length interval of points. In the δ-Dispersion problem, the task is to find a maximum number of points (possibly inside edges) that are pairwise at distance at least δ from each other. Similarly, in the δ-Covering problem, the task is to find a minimum number of points (possibly inside edges) such that every point of the graph (including those inside edges) is at distance at most δ from the selected point set. We provide a comprehensive understanding of these two problems on bounded-treewidth graphs.

Token Rankings are Unforgeable Language Model Signatures

2026-06-03T05:06:35Z

Language model parameters are known to impose unique (to each model) geometric constraints on their logit outputs, which serves as a signature that identifies the model, but also leaks the model's final layer parameters when an API distributes logits. We investigate more restrictive APIs that expose token rankings (i.e., their ordering by probability, but not the probability values) and find that rankings also constitute a signature: every model has a unique set of feasible top-$k$ rankings for sufficiently large $k$. Furthermore, the ranking signature is the first known (polynomially) unforgeable signature, since finding a model with the same set of feasible rankings is NP-hard. On the security front, we find that token rankings are already sufficient to approximately steal the final layer of the model, similar to logits, though the approximation is too coarse to forge the signature, and can be effectively countered by restricting the API to top-$k$ tokens with sufficiently small $k$. Since the top-$k$ required to present the model signature is generally smaller than the $k$ required to prevent stealing, it is possible for an API to present an unforgeable signature without leaking model parameters.

Bit-counting complexity classes

2026-06-03T03:34:27Z

We define a new family of complexity classes called bit-counting complexity classes, since membership depends not merely on the number of accepting paths, but also on the binary profile of that number. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the classical complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We further show that all of these complexity classes are Turing equivalent ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We also prove that classical complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$.

Simulating Polynomial-Time Nondeterministic Turing Machines via Nondeterministic Turing Machines

2026-06-03T03:28:34Z

We prove in this paper that there is a language $L_s$ accepted by some nondeterministic Turing machine that runs within time $O(n^k)$ for any positive integer $k\in\mathbb{N}_1$ but not by any ${\rm co}\mathcal{NP}$ machines. Then we further show that $L_s$ is in $\mathcal{NP}$, thus proving a groundbreaking result that $$\mathcal{NP}\neq{\rm co}\mathcal{NP}. $$ The main techniques used in this paper are simulation and the novel new techniques developed in the author's recent work. Our main result has profound implications, such as $\mathcal{P}\neq\mathcal{NP}$, etc. Further, if there exists some oracle $A$ such that $\mathcal{P}^A\ne\mathcal{NP}^A={\rm co}\mathcal{NP}^A$, we then explore what mystery lies behind it and show that if $\mathcal{P}^A\ne\mathcal{NP}^A={\rm co}\mathcal{NP}^A$ and under some rational assumptions, then the set of all ${\rm co}\mathcal{NP}^A$ machines is not enumerable, thus showing that the simulation techniques are not applicable for the first half of the whole step to separate $\mathcal{NP}^A$ from ${\rm co}\mathcal{NP}^A$. Finally, a lower bounds result for Frege proof systems is presented (i.e., no Frege proof systems can be polynomially bounded).

Learning Randomized Reductions

2026-06-03T03:12:59Z

Randomized self-reductions (RSRs) express $f(x)$ using $f$ evaluated at random correlated points, enabling self-correcting programs, instance-hiding protocols, and applications in complexity theory and cryptography. Yet discovering RSRs has required manual expert derivation for over 40 years, limiting their practical use. We present Bitween for automated RSR learning. First, we formalize RSR learning with sample complexity analysis under correlated sampling. Second, we develop Vanilla Bitween, which integrates multiple backends (linear regression, genetic programming, symbolic regression, and mixed-integer programming). The linear regression backend outperforms the others, discovering RSRs for 43 of 80 functions (54%) in RSR-Bench, our benchmark suite, including the first known reduction for sigmoid. Third, we introduce Agentic Bitween, a neuro-symbolic approach where LLM agents propose novel query functions beyond the fixed set ($x+r$, $x-r$, $x \cdot r$, $x$, $r$) in prior work. Agentic Bitween discovers RSRs for 64 of 80 functions (80%), outperforming pure neural baselines in both RSR discovery and verification accuracy.

Hardness as an Information Constraint: A Unifying Meta-Complexity Assumption

2026-06-02T22:18:38Z

Monroe (2026) shows that the nonexistence of an optimal proof system can be read as an information constraint regarding canonical hard instances: no sound arithmetic theory simulates the extensions adjoining sufficiently large, unprovable Busy Beaver values. Furthermore, if the best-known route to simulation is also necessary -- that is, if simulation requires a relative-consistency explanation over a weak base theory -- then the same constraint holds for inaccessible Kolmogorov-randomness facts. Call this Kolmogorov Hardness (KH). We argue that open questions in computational complexity can likewise be reformulated as information constraints involving Kolmogorov-random strings. Variants of KH yield, as conditional consequences, dense families of small hard tautologies, no-mutual-help phenomena for independent random axioms, PH noncollapse with explicit dense separators at each level, $SAT\notin P/poly$, and canonical disjoint NP pairs arising from random-axiom constructions. Time-bounded and sparse-support variants extend the same template to one-way functions via Liu--Pass, derandomization, natural-proofs-style limitations, and Feige-style random refutation. This framework gives a unified working model of complexity theorists' beliefs, organized around canonical hard instances. It seems self-evident that efficient proofs in a theory should not leverage true randomness facts the theory cannot verify. Yet the structural features of KH and its variants suggest they may be formally independent of standard metatheories. They behave like reflection principles; their internal readings fail in nonstandard models even when the corresponding external readings are true; and the same information constraints may apply to the metatheories themselves. We propose a research program: extend the model, resolve questions of formal independence, and identify which principles are potential new axioms.

Planar Perfect Matching Counting is as Hard as Determinants

2026-06-02T17:56:22Z

In the 1960s, Fisher, Kasteleyn and Temperley designed an ingenious algorithm for computing the partition function of the dimer model, or equivalently, for counting perfect matchings in edge-weighted planar graphs (Philos. Mag. 1961; J. Mathematical Phys. 1963). This FKT algorithm later became the foundation for Valiant's holographic algorithms (FOCS 2004; SIAM J. Comput. 2008), which motivated the study of counting problems under the Holant framework. Combined with an algorithm by Yuster (FOCS 2008), the FKT algorithm allows us to count edge-weighted perfect matchings in planar $n$-vertex graphs with $\tilde{O}(n^{ω/2})$ arithmetic operations, where $ω<2.372$ is the matrix multiplication exponent. We prove a corresponding lower bound: Over algebraic circuits and other sufficiently strong computational models, perfect matchings in edge-weighted $n$-vertex planar graphs $G$ cannot be counted in $O(n^{ω/2-ε})$ arithmetic operations. This confirms the optimality of Yuster's algorithm. Our bound holds even when $G$ is an edge-weighted square grid.

APX-Hardness of Computing Lipschitz Constants for Multi-Parametric Quadratic Programs

2026-06-02T16:35:43Z

Computing the Lipschitz constant of the solution map of a multi-parametric quadratic program is important for the analysis of optimization-based control. This problem is governed by three factors: the parameter dimension, the number of decision variables, and the number of constraints. While empirical evidence has long suggested exponential complexity, a rigorous complexity-theoretic proof has been lacking. In this paper, we fill this gap by proving that this problem is not only NP-hard but also APX-hard. Furthermore, we reveal that: (a) the problem becomes polynomial-time solvable when the number of constraints or decision variables is fixed; and (b) both NP-hardness and APX-hardness persist even in the scalar parameter case. These results confirm that the complexity stems from the number of constraints and variables, rather than the parameter dimension. Numerical experiments further validate these theoretical findings.

Collision Resistance of Single-Layer Neural Nets

2026-06-02T15:52:45Z

We initiate the study of the algorithmic complexity of finding collisions in single-layer binary neural networks. Given a random matrix $\mathbf{A} \in \mathbb{R}^{m\times n}$, an input $\mathbf{x} \in \{-1,1\}^n$ is mapped to a binary output vector $\varphi(\mathbf{A}\mathbf{x})\in \{-1,1\}^m$, where $\varphi$ is an activation function with constant behavior on $[κ, \infty)$ for some threshold $κ\geq 0$. We identify the threshold scale $κ=Θ(1/\sqrtα)$, where $α=m/n$, as separating two complementary phenomena. When $κ\ll 1/\sqrtα$, we give a simple online algorithm that efficiently produces extensive collisions. When $κ\gg 1/\sqrtα$, for a natural \emph{randomized} non-periodic activation and suitable oscillation complexity, we prove that the extensive-collision space exhibits an overlap gap property (OGP), yielding an exponential lower bound against online algorithms. Ours is the first work to use the overlap gap property as a rigorous criterion for collision resistance. The key difference between collision finding and average-case search is that collision finding has a new ``worst-case'' aspect: the collision finder has full control over the choice of colliding pairs. Our lower bound is proved in the online model; extending such guarantees to broader classes of algorithms, including spectral, algebraic, lattice-based, or quantum methods, remains an open direction.

ETH-Tight Complexity of Optimal Morse Matching on Bounded-Treewidth Complexes

2026-06-02T14:22:20Z

The Optimal Morse Matching (OMM) problem asks for a discrete gradient vector field on a simplicial complex that minimizes the number of critical simplices. It is NP-hard and has been studied extensively in heuristic, approximation, and parameterized complexity settings. Parameterized by treewidth $k$, OMM has long been known to be solvable on triangulations of $3$-manifolds in $2^{O(k^2)} n^{O(1)}$ time and in FPT time for triangulations of arbitrary manifolds, but the exact dependence on $k$ has remained an open question. We resolve this by giving a new $2^{O(k \log k)} n$-time algorithm for any finite regular CW complex, and show that no $2^{o(k \log k)} n^{O(1)}$-time algorithm exists unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails.