https://arxiv.org/api/Il+KOUax+Enh8kRt3XSU6pxsiv8 2026-09-10T17:24:46Z 199051 15 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.13047v2 2026-09-09T16:29:46Z

Conversational speech reveals early signs of cognitive decline, including dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI). AI models show promise for speech-based screening, yet most research focuses on monolingual groups. In the UK, dementia is projected to rise fastest among Black and Asian communities, where multilingualism is common, making equity assessment critical. We recruited 1,395 participants (monolingual English speakers and multilingual speakers from Sheffield/Bradford) and collected over 263 hours of speech via the CognoMemory agent. Multilingual participants spoke English alongside Somali, Chinese, or South Asian languages (Hindi, Urdu, Punjabi, Mirpuri, Arabic). We evaluated ASR (Whisper, Wav2Vec 2.0, NeMo) and downstream AI models for cognitive classification and MMSE regression. ASR accuracy showed no significant differences across groups. However, downstream models exhibited systematic disparities: multilingual speakers were more often misclassified as impaired, especially in memory, fluency, and reading tasks. False-positive rates were substantially higher for multilingual (28 to 37%) than monolingual (12 to 16%) speakers, meaning multilingual individuals were approximately 2.5 times more likely to receive incorrect impairment labels. These biases worsened when models were trained on DementiaBank. This is the first large-scale analysis of false-positive bias in speech-based AI cognitive screening for UK multilingual ethnic minorities. Despite strong overall performance, current models show measurable disparities affecting multilingual speakers. Addressing these biases is essential for safe, equitable deployment in diverse healthcare settings.

2026-02-13T16:03:37Z Madhurananda Pahar Caitlin Illingworth Dorota Braun Bahman Mirheidari Lise Sproson Daniel Blackburn Heidi Christensen http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15475v3 2026-09-09T16:14:24Z

Quantized Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models expose a weight-fault surface: Rowhammer-style faults can corrupt deployed INT8 bits. We present the first bit-flip attack on a VLA: a few gradient-selected flips reduce closed-loop success to $0\%$, while hundreds of random flips are harmless. Across four model variants spanning three action-head families, damaging bits concentrate in a few action-generating layers, but the empirical budget depends sharply on the head: direct regression and token policies fall in $1$--$5$ flips, whereas the evaluated flow-matching policies require ${\sim}100$--$300$. Our fixed-direction manifold-escape loss cuts \pizero{}'s budget from ${\sim}1000$ to ${\sim}100$ flips, and a matched five-direction sweep shows that the attack is not specific to an all-positive direction. On a direct head, protecting $3.1\%$ of weights preserves $60\%$ success at $K{=}100$, and protecting $5.3\%$ moves the open-loop break threshold from 3 to 100 flips. Finally, task-calibrated emulated $K{=}100$ flips yield $0/20$ real-robot successes, versus $14/20$ clean and $16/20$ global-random. Weight integrity is therefore a security boundary for embodied foundation models. Code is included as ancillary material.

2026-08-16T01:44:09Z Yudong Gao Linghan Chen Wenhan Wu Mia Zhou Jiyao Wang Kaiyan Ji Mingyu Guo Honglong Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10385v1 2026-09-09T16:10:29Z

Animation and VFX pre-production review requires teams to translate loosely specified creative intent--briefs, evolving specifications, heterogeneous references, and verbal decisions--into revisions that junior artists can execute without repeated clarification. In practice, criteria drift across iterations, review judgments lose their evidential basis, and the reasoning behind a request rarely survives the senior-junior handoff. We contribute a design framework for intent-evidence-action alignment: intent is articulated into a shared project record, judgments are anchored to grounded evidence, and authorized decisions are converted into clear revision tasks tied directly to reference notes. We instantiate this framework in MOONWALK, a professional pre-production review system comprising a shared intent record, reference/specification anchoring, structured work-in-progress comparison, and supervisor-authorized action planning. In this workflow, AI handles administrative coordination--flagging missing context and organizing notes--while artists retain full creative direction. An in-studio study with professional practitioners compares MOONWALK with a chat-only (chatbot) interface using matched production materials, while participants' existing workflows provide a retrospective ecological baseline. Results indicate stronger intent alignment, decision traceability, and checklist executability, while also showing that aesthetic authority and final prioritization must remain with practitioners. The evaluation establishes the value of the integrated structured workflow over unstructured conversational AI chatbot. Code: https://github.com/Akinesia112/Moonwalk/tree/english-version

2026-09-09T16:10:29Z Shih-Yu Lai Wen-Fan Wang Sai Ling Shaune Jan Bing-Yu Chen Xiang Anthony Chen http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10372v1 2026-09-09T16:02:36Z

We present the PACE, a framework for retrieval-augmented dialogue serving that formalizes Perceived Time-to-First-Response (PTFR) as a QoE objective and minimizes it under quality/cost constraints. Unlike prior work on cascaded routing, semantic caching, or adaptive retrieval, PACE jointly controls which answer source composes the response and what fills the waiting window. Deployed on a humanoid-robot sales service, it combines three mechanisms: a load-adaptive cascading router, a joint path-filler controller, and volatility-aware cache admission. On 75k CarQA requests, the cascade halves pure-LLM PTFR at P95 (0.29 vs 0.53s at c16). The adaptive controller reaches 0.41s P95, outperforming RAG by 2.4 times at high load with equal quality. The filler controller cuts calls by 94% with zero conflict. Volatility-aware admission reduces stale answers from 86% to 0%. A gating rule ensures the controller never worse than the baseline, with exposure bounded by one hold period. This is the first quantification of filler-answer conflict risk in deployed services.

2026-09-09T16:02:36Z Lin Huang Yujuan Tan Weisheng Li Lixiang Zeng Kun Yang Suihan Xiao http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10364v1 2026-09-09T15:56:26Z

Simultaneous assessment of medical imaging and patient records is often required in clinical diagnosis. However, standard machine learning algorithms cannot analyze these data types together. Meanwhile, compliance with HIPAA and GDPR can constrain centralized aggregation of sensitive patient data. This leaves a crucial void of secure fusion of visual and textual context across distant networks. Thus, we present OmniMed-FL, a controlled systems study of multimodal federated learning for five-class clinical condition classification (Normal, Pneumonia, COVID-19, Pleural Effusion, Cardiomegaly). Our proxy corpus pairs 3,000 public chest radiographs with 3,000 class-conditioned synthetic notes, matched by class, not by patient. The framework benchmarks eight fusion strategies, three initializations, four missing-text imputation rules, and matched federated baselines under non-IID Dirichlet partitioning across 3 to 20 hospital clients. As all notes are synthetic and pairing is not patient-level, these are descriptive proxy comparisons, not estimates of diagnostic performance or deployment readiness. Within those limits with clients ($K=5$) and severe skew ($α=0.1$), local-only training achieves a macro-F1 score of 0.297, FedAvg achieves $0.662\pm0.074$, FedProx $0.737\pm0.085$, a matched FedMME-style one-shot ensemble $0.647\pm0.080$, and our SCAFFOLD-AdamW adaptation $0.070\pm0.015$, the 0.075 FedProx-FedAvg gap falling inside the wider of the two two-seed standard deviations. Over a $4\times3$ grid, label skew costs up to 0.27 F1 whereas a near-sevenfold client increase costs at most 0.10, while bidirectional volume grows linearly to 183.5 GiB at $K=20$. Multimodal fusion leads on both corpora, scoring 0.956 against 0.934 for text and 0.664 for images on the synthetic corpus and 0.906 against 0.880 and 0.737 on the radiograph corpus, for $2.3\times$ the model state of text alone.

2026-09-09T15:56:26Z Accepted in IEEE Globecom 2026, E-Health Ayush Debnath Ruelia Saha Sudip Misra http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10350v1 2026-09-09T15:46:16Z

The banking system now depends on a small set of shared artificial intelligence vendors for fraud screening, credit decisioning, anti-money-laundering triage, customer analytics, and internal decision support. This paper studies how a compromise inside one of those vendors can propagate along a chain of operational, informational, and financial linkages until it triggers losses that look, from the outside, like a classical banking crisis. We build a four-layer heterogeneous network that couples AI vendors, financial institutions, interbank exposures, and customer accounts, and we propose CFC-Prop, a stochastic epidemic-and-clearing model that runs on that network. On a synthetic dataset with 60 vendors, 220 banks, roughly 2,500 vendor-bank service edges, and 1,400 interbank exposures, CFC-Prop reproduces the heavy-tailed loss distributions and the sharp dependence on patch latency that are consistent with prior cyber-financial evidence. We also train an early-warning model, CFC-GNN, that uses vendor-side incident telemetry and graph structure to flag high-cascade-risk vendors before impact. Across four baselines the proposed model reaches AUROC 0.82 and AUPRC 0.60 while keeping calibration errors bounded. We release the full code, synthetic data, and reproducible scripts. The results argue that cyber concentration among AI vendors is a first-order financial-stability problem and give supervisors a concrete quantitative tool for reasoning about it.

2026-09-09T15:46:16Z 11 fig and 10 tables Alex Leytes http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10346v1 2026-09-09T15:44:32Z

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) process hundreds or thousands of visual tokens per image, incurring prohibitive inference costs. While existing vision token pruning methods mitigate this overhead, they implicitly assume that a single fixed pruning strategy can be applied uniformly across all inputs. Our analysis further reveals that ranking pruning methods by average benchmark accuracy conceals substantial sample-wise complementarity: although the average-best strategy excels overall, alternative strategies prove superior on a significant fraction of individual samples. To harness this diversity, we propose VIP-Router, a lightweight VIsion Pruning Router that adaptively selects the pruning strategy predicted to be best suited to each input at a specified pruning level. Conditioned on low-cost visual and textual features, VIP-Router identifies the most suitable candidate strategy while retaining full-token inference as an option when pruning is predicted to be unfavorable. Evaluated on a curated suite of pruning-sensitive visual perception benchmarks, VTC-Bench Group A, VIP-Router consistently outperforms the best fixed strategy baseline across all reduction ratios, achieving a 26.9% relative improvement in average accuracy, and a 22.0% relative increase in average utility after accounting for realized token cost. Crucially, VIP-Router operates in a plug-and-play manner without modifying underlying pruning algorithms or model weights, introducing trainable parameters equivalent to merely 0.017\% of the backbone. Furthermore, VIP-Router proves effective across various MLLM backbones and yields consistent gains on unseen benchmarks, highlighting the potential of sample adaptive routing for visual token pruning.

2026-09-09T15:44:32Z 26 pages, 6 figures. Code will be released soon Haiji Liang Pengfei Zhou Zhenglin Wan Wei Wang Yang You Wangbo Zhao http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06765v2 2026-09-09T15:42:48Z

Continuous-time dynamic graph models predict future links by compressing past interactions into neural states. Although effective for forecasting, this computation obscures which entities are shared across events and how temporal patterns contribute to a prediction. We treat this gap as a property of the predictive architecture rather than a problem to be addressed after prediction. Link-Fact Temporal Rule Inducer (LiFTER) is a neuro-symbolic predictor that preserves observed interactions as grounded temporal facts and applies executable tempo- ral rules to pre-query facts. Each score is a signed sum of rule exe- cutions whose historical facts, entity bindings, and temporal order are explicitly satisfied. The evidence and rules responsible for a prediction can therefore be inspected, independently recomputed, and intervened upon. Across four CTDG benchmarks, LiFTER achieves competitive historical-negative forecasting and the highest macro explanation ac- curacy and deletion fidelity. The same architecture also serves as a microscope that separates the contributions of recurrence, history po- sition, and transition across datasets and traces them to individual facts. Independent execution reconstructs all logits for 19,664 test predictions with a maximum error of 0.0000131. LiFTER turns future-link forecasting into a verifiable grounded computation.

2026-08-07T03:39:09Z Minwoo Yu Young-guk Ha http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20555v2 2026-09-09T15:42:08Z

We introduce a novel method that averages the logits of a frozen reference policy (e.g., SFT) and a trainable policy, and incorporate the method into Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). In contrast to Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) methods, our proposal does not involve a Kullback Leibler (KL) regularization or critic; the trainable policy and the reference anchor are coupled through the logit averaging structure to leverage the reasoning expertise of the trainable policy while maintaining the formatting advantage of SFT. Our method is evaluated on MATH, cn-k12, and MMLU, and the results show a higher accuracy or at least comparable accuracy relative to the canonical KL-regularized GRPO.

2026-05-19T23:15:18Z Xingwei Gan Ying Zhu http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.07925v2 2026-09-09T15:35:02Z

We present FrogNano, a 4B coding agent designed to tackle software engineering (SWE) tasks efficiently and effectively, even under resource-constrained environments. It is post-trained exclusively via RL on around 1,500 SWE environments with synthetic tasks. A key ingredient for improving performance is an online task synthesis pipeline that creates tasks calibrated to the frontier of learnability for the current checkpoint. This report provides evidence that competitive small coding agents can be trained with synthetic tasks alone, without traditional distillation from larger models, and that generating tasks at the learnability frontier of the current agent is important. We report details on the training methodology, evaluations across diverse environments, and in-depth analyses, serving as a foundation for our ongoing exploration of lightweight yet capable coding agents that can run on minimal hardware.

2026-09-07T19:39:38Z Minseon Kim Zhengyan Shi Emiliano Penaloza Christopher Cui Roger Creus Castanyer Maryam Hashemzadeh Isadora White Jonathan Light Jeonghye Kim Matheus Pereira Darya Moldavskaya Chinmay Singh Fabio Vera Baolin Peng Xingdi Yuan Marc-Alexandre Côté Alessandro Sordoni http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10335v1 2026-09-09T15:33:25Z

Plane geometry remains a significant challenge in AI, requiring the integration of visual perception and mathematical reasoning. While Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) naturally handle visuo-linguistic inputs, they are often computationally intensive and opaque. We demonstrate that a pure Large Language Model (LLM), when equipped with specialized modules, can rival state-of-the-art LMMs on complex geometry problems. Our framework integrates a Geometric Vision Parser, which translates diagrams into symbolic form, with a Symbolic Solver that performs formal deductions, thereby mitigating hallucinations and promoting interpretable reasoning. To enable rigorous evaluation, we curate a benchmark of challenging problems from the 2025 Chinese Zhongkao examinations, ensuring data novelty and testing deeper deductive skills. Experiments demonstrate that our approach achieves performance comparable to Gemini 2.5 Pro while delivering clearer, human-like solutions.

2026-09-09T15:33:25Z Weichen Dai Rafael Medeiros Cabral Ziyi Shou Yan Cao Xin Shen Dongcai Lu Yi Zhou http://arxiv.org/abs/2608.15129v2 2026-09-09T15:25:31Z

We systematically compare word order preferences in decoder-only language models across 192 artificial languages and typologically diverse natural languages. On artificial languages, models exhibit a left-branching preference that aligns with neither natural language universals nor human word order learning biases. On natural languages, monolingual models show no clear base word order bias at small scales, but as data grows, a preference for right-branching subject-verb-object (SVO) languages emerges while SOV falls behind despite being the most frequent order cross-linguistically. This SVO advantage extends to multilingual models and correlates with language resource level and data quality rather than word order. Thus, the same architecture exhibits opposite preferences on artificial and natural languages, establishing that word order biases observed in practice are data-driven. Since highly-resourced languages are overwhelmingly SVO, these biases risk gradually reducing word order diversity, particularly in languages that productively use multiple word orders, with the widespread adoption of LLMs.

2026-08-15T09:03:10Z Accepted to EMNLP 2026 (Main Conference). 22 pages, 12 figures, 7 tables Varvara Arzt Allan Hanbury Terra Blevins http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04298v2 2026-09-09T15:25:10Z

Evaluating agents on the growing number of agentic benchmarks is challenging because they often require complex environments and agent integrations. We introduce Harbor Adapters, a unified evaluation infrastructure for agentic benchmarks. Our work makes three contributions. First, we develop benchmark adapters that port more than 80 benchmarks to evaluate arbitrary agents, and validate them through rigorous code review and parity experiments. Second, we conduct a large-scale evaluation of 8 models spanning capability tiers across 54 benchmarks; every model is run with Terminus-2 and with one of 3 native harnesses. This enables a broader analysis of agent capabilities and failure modes than was previously possible. Third, we introduce Harbor-Index, a curated set of 82 difficult, diverse, and high-quality tasks spanning 29 benchmarks, refined from the adapted suite through difficulty filtering, AI and human audit, and an audit-and-fix loop. Harbor-Index preserves the challenge and breadth of large-scale agentic evaluations while being affordable to run; no evaluated model-harness configuration exceeds 30% pass rate, and the strongest (GPT-5.5 with Codex) reaches 28.0%. We release the adapters, evaluation results, in-depth analysis, and Harbor-Index as open-source artifacts to support more reliable and comprehensive evaluation of language-model agents.

2026-09-03T16:26:20Z Lin Shi Audrey Haowei Lin Audrey Zixuan Zhu Audrey Xiaoyue Zhou Audrey Xiang Li Audrey Xiangning Lin Audrey Yaxuan Deng Audrey Han Xu Audrey Yuangang Li Audrey Shanda Li Audrey Zizhao Chen Audrey Hanwen Xing Audrey Harsh Raj Audrey Bo Chen Audrey Quan Shi Audrey Steven Dillmann Audrey Yipeng Gao Audrey Puneesh Khanna Audrey Ruofan Lu Audrey Chao Beyond Zhou Audrey Michael Yang Audrey Robert Zhang Audrey Siyuan Chai Audrey Jiayu Chang Audrey Yizhao Chen Audrey Xiaokun Chen Audrey Yiwei Dai Audrey Wenting Yang Audrey Hange Liu Audrey Minghao Liu Audrey Zihan Wang Audrey Adnan El Assadi Audrey Benedikt Stroebl Audrey E. Kelly Buchanan Audrey Han Meng Audrey Junwei He Audrey Longxuan Yu Audrey Radin Shayanfar Audrey Yukyung Lee Audrey Zhikang Dong Audrey Allen G Hart Audrey Anjiang Wei Audrey Anurag Kashyap Audrey Arpandeep Khatua Audrey Audrey Jixin Zheng Audrey Chengrui Ma Audrey David Heineman Audrey Dubing Chen Audrey Hai-Anh Trinh Audrey Haishuo Fang Audrey Hefan Zhang Audrey Hui Shen Audrey Issa Sugiura Audrey Jiankai Sun Audrey Jiechao Gao Audrey Junhong Lin Audrey Junnan Li Audrey Kai Yang Audrey Lei Hsiung Audrey Maoyu Wang Audrey Mengze Tang Audrey Nabil Omi Audrey Negin Raoof Audrey Nicholas Edwards Audrey Octavia Guo Audrey Orfeas Menis Mastromichalakis Audrey Pengliang Ji Audrey Przemysław Hejman Audrey Qi Qi Audrey Qunshu Lin Audrey Richard Zhuang Audrey Rui Yang Audrey Ruichen Zheng Audrey Ryan Marten Audrey Shaghayegh Fazliani Audrey Shizheng Hou Audrey Sicong Jiang Audrey Sijie Li Audrey Song Bian Audrey Terry Yue Zhuo Audrey Tianqing Wu Audrey Tom Tang Audrey Wanjia Zhao Audrey Weihao Xuan Audrey Wenhua Liang Audrey Xian Liu Audrey Xin Lan Audrey Xuan Zhang Audrey Xuandong Zhao Audrey Yanchuan Tang Audrey Yifan Jiang Audrey Yijiang Li Audrey Yitong Guan Audrey Yizhi Li Audrey Yonghui Liu Audrey Yuheng Tang Audrey Yujun Audrey Mao Yunfei Zhao Yuxin Wang Yuxuan Tang Zhenheng Tang Zhifei Li Ziruo Wang Ziyu She Kaiyuan Liu Iheb Chaabane Yuxin Tang Xiangyi Li Andy Konwinski Boxuan Li Leon Liangyu Chen Alex Dimakis Nicholas Carlini Soroush Vosoughi Di He Etash Guha Benjamin Feuer Mike Merrill Ludwig Schmidt Alex Shaw http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.14175v2 2026-09-09T15:22:19Z

In a long conversation, an LLM can produce a plausible continuation that rests on premises the conversation has already abandoned. No runtime check ties its output to what the conversation has established, a gap that context-manipulation attacks on deployed agents exploit. We close this gap with a runtime verifier: an LLM Interpreter classifies each utterance into one of eight epistemic operations, and a symbolic engine applies them to a dependency map that records what every claim rests on and whether it still stands. Whether a continuation is grounded reduces to a walk over the map, linear in its size, with no LLM call. Retraction propagates through the same map with a conflict-free guarantee, flagging exactly the conclusions that lose support. On ReviseQA for belief revision and MemoryAgentBench's fact-consolidation split, two third-party benchmarks where earlier premises are superseded, the verifier leads a budget-matched retrieval baseline across five QA models and lifts MemoryAgentBench single-hop accuracy from 0.46--0.95 to 0.93--0.98. With the verifier, even the 7B model overtakes unaided GPT-4o. These runs feed the engine the benchmarks' own structured updates. When a GPT-4o Interpreter extracts every update from raw text instead, accuracy is statistically unchanged. Per-query cost is flat in conversation length, prompts staying near 0.8k tokens where full context reaches 114k and retraction queries under a microsecond at 2000 turns.

2026-05-13T22:54:16Z Qisong He Jinwei Hu Xinmiao Huang Changshun Wu Yi Dong Xiaowei Huang http://arxiv.org/abs/2609.10315v1 2026-09-09T15:21:47Z

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has advanced language-model reasoning in domains such as mathematics and code, where objective answers are inexpensive to check. Diagnostic reasoning over complex data lacks this advantage: establishing the true cause of an anomaly often requires costly expert investigation and may remain ambiguous after the fact. We ask whether this asymmetry of verification can instead be engineered. We sample an intervention, inject it into a controlled simulator, and generate the observations it would produce. The hidden intervention provides an oracle label and objective reward, while the agent must still investigate noisy, confounded, and distributed evidence. We instantiate this approach in TRACE, a digital-advertising diagnostic environment with 12 root causes and fine-grained segment attribution. Agents investigate each episode using Python and SQL and must identify both the root cause and, when applicable, the affected segment assignment. On a held-out 235-episode test set, the strongest prompted baseline, Claude Opus 5, reaches 0.686 FullAttr@1. Supervised fine-tuning raises Qwen3.5-35B-A3B from 0.159 to 0.637, and subsequent RL with synthesized rewards reaches 0.757, outperforming all evaluated prompted baselines, including frontier closed-source models and a prompted Qwen3.5-122B-A10B model. The resulting policy also uses substantially fewer tool calls than the prompted 35B base. These results provide evidence that access to a scalable, objective training signal can be a more important constraint than model scale alone. More broadly, simulation-based verification can make otherwise ambiguous diagnostic reasoning tasks amenable to scalable reinforcement learning.

2026-09-09T15:21:47Z Rui Sun Zhan Shi Bing He