https://arxiv.org/api/zt/9C8ppx1DKbgO1+jug+z3AzfU2026-06-10T11:38:43Z6960416515http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02703v1Euclid: Early Release Observations -- Internal kinematics and the convective-transition gap of NGC 63972026-06-01T18:00:01ZWe present a 'multiple-pass' data-reduction tool designed for Euclid, based on software developed for the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), which improves the astrometric and photometric precision for faint sources and in crowded fields. In this work, we apply it to Euclid Early Release Observations of the Galactic globular cluster NGC 6397. By combining our new catalogue with archival HST data, separated by a time span of approximately 20 years, we were able to measure high-precision proper motions and investigate the radial variations in the energy equipartition and velocity anisotropy of the cluster. The combination of deep and wide-field observations also allowed us to derive the present-day local mass function of NGC 6397 and to study the radial dependence of mass segregation and binary fraction. Finally, we report the discovery of a subtle under-density of stars in the colour-magnitude diagram of NGC 6397 around a stellar mass of 0.35 M$_\odot$ with a more than 5$σ$ confidence level. This feature is consistent with the Gaia M-dwarf gap discovered in Galactic field stars, but it has never previously been observed in a globular cluster. The gap is caused by the onset of full convection in stellar interiors. We demonstrate that the properties of the gap provide tight constraints on the distance to NGC 6397 and its intrinsic metallicity dispersion, offering a new benchmark for stellar evolution models.2026-06-01T18:00:01Z18 pages, 17 figures, accepted by A&AM. GriggioSpace Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr, Baltimore, MD 21218, USAM. LibralatoINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Via dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, ItalyR. GerasimovDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Notre Dame, Nieuwland Science Hall, Notre Dame, 46556, Indiana, USAL. R. BedinINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Via dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, ItalyA. BelliniSpace Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr, Baltimore, MD 21218, USAJ. AndersonSpace Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr, Baltimore, MD 21218, USAE. DalessandroINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyE. VesperiniDepartment of Astronomy, Indiana University, 727 East Third Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, USAH. BaumgardtSchool of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, AustraliaD. MassariINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyM. CadelanoDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "Augusto Righi" - Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyR. E. RyanSpace Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr, Baltimore, MD 21218, USAI. McDonaldJodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UKF. AnnibaliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyE. BalbinotKapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, PO Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The NetherlandsLeiden Observatory, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The NetherlandsJ. -C. CuillandreUniversité Paris-Saclay, Université Paris Cité, CEA, CNRS, AIM, 91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, FranceD. ErkalSchool of Mathematics and Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UKA. M. N. FergusonInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UKM. KlugeMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyP. B. KuzmaInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UKT. SaifollahiUniversité de Strasbourg, CNRS, Observatoire astronomique de Strasbourg, UMR 7550, 67000 Strasbourg, FranceCentre National d'Etudes Spatiales -- Centre spatial de Toulouse, 18 avenue Edouard Belin, 31401 Toulouse Cedex 9, FranceM. SchirmerMax-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, GermanyK. VoggelUniversité de Strasbourg, CNRS, Observatoire astronomique de Strasbourg, UMR 7550, 67000 Strasbourg, FranceB. AltieriESAC/ESA, Camino Bajo del Castillo, s/n., Urb. Villafranca del Castillo, 28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainS. AndreonINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, 20122 Milano, ItalyN. AuricchioINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyC. BaccigalupiIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the Universe, via Beirut 2, 34151 Trieste, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyINFN, Sezione di Trieste, Via Valerio 2, 34127 Trieste TS, ItalySISSA, International School for Advanced Studies, Via Bonomea 265, 34136 Trieste TS, ItalyM. BaldiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Bologna, Via Gobetti 93/2, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyA. BalestraINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Via dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, ItalyS. BardelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyP. BattagliaINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyA. BivianoINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the Universe, via Beirut 2, 34151 Trieste, ItalyE. BranchiniDipartimento di Fisica, Università di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, 20122 Milano, ItalyM. BresciaDepartment of Physics "E. Pancini", University Federico II, Via Cinthia 6, 80126, Napoli, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Via Moiariello 16, 80131 Napoli, ItalyS. CameraDipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via P. Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Torino, Via P. Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino, Via Osservatorio 20, 10025 Pino TorineseV. CapobiancoINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino, Via Osservatorio 20, 10025 Pino TorineseC. CarboneINAF-IASF Milano, Via Alfonso Corti 12, 20133 Milano, ItalyJ. CarreteroCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y TecnológicasPort d'Informació Científica, Campus UAB, C. Albareda s/n, 08193 BellaterraM. CastellanoINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, 00078 Monteporzio Catone, ItalyG. CastignaniINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyS. CavuotiINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Via Moiariello 16, 80131 Napoli, ItalyINFN section of Naples, Via Cinthia 6, 80126, Napoli, ItalyA. CimattiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "Augusto Righi" - Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyC. Colodro-CondeInstituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, SpainG. CongedoInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UKC. J. ConseliceJodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UKL. ConversiEuropean Space Agency/ESRIN, Largo Galileo Galilei 1, 00044 Frascati, Roma, ItalyESAC/ESA, Camino Bajo del Castillo, s/n., Urb. Villafranca del Castillo, 28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainY. CopinUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822, Villeurbanne, F-69100, FranceF. CourbinInstitut de Ciències del CosmosInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsInstitut de Ciencies de l'EspaiH. M. CourtoisUCB Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IUF, IP2I Lyon, 4 rue Enrico Fermi, 69622 Villeurbanne, FranceM. CropperMullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St Mary, Dorking, Surrey RH5 6NT, UKG. De LuciaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyF. DubathDepartment of Astronomy, University of Geneva, ch. d'Ecogia 16, 1290 Versoix, SwitzerlandX. DupacESAC/ESA, Camino Bajo del Castillo, s/n., Urb. Villafranca del Castillo, 28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainM. FarinaINAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, via del Fosso del Cavaliere, 100, 00100 Roma, ItalyR. FarinelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyS. FerriolUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822, Villeurbanne, F-69100, FranceE. FranceschiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyS. GaleottaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyK. GeorgeUniversity Observatory, LMU Faculty of Physics, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 Munich, GermanyC. GiocoliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyJ. Gracia-CarpioMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyA. GrazianINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Via dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, ItalyF. GruppMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, GermanyS. V. H. HauganInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1029 Blindern, 0315 Oslo, NorwayH. HoekstraLeiden Observatory, Leiden University, Einsteinweg 55, 2333 CC Leiden, The NetherlandsW. HolmesJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA, 91109, USAF. HormuthFelix Hormuth Engineering, Goethestr. 17, 69181 Leimen, GermanyA. HornstrupTechnical University of Denmark, Elektrovej 327, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, DenmarkCosmic Dawn CenterK. JahnkeMax-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, GermanyM. JhabvalaNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USAS. KermicheAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, FranceA. KiesslingJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA, 91109, USAB. KubikUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822, Villeurbanne, F-69100, FranceM. KümmelUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, GermanyH. Kurki-SuonioDepartment of Physics, P.O. Box 64, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandHelsinki Institute of Physics, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandA. M. C. Le BrunLaboratoire d'etude de l'Univers et des phenomenes eXtremes, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 92190 Meudon, FranceS. LigoriINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino, Via Osservatorio 20, 10025 Pino TorineseP. B. LiljeInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1029 Blindern, 0315 Oslo, NorwayV. LindholmDepartment of Physics, P.O. Box 64, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandHelsinki Institute of Physics, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandI. LloroSKAO, Jodrell Bank, Lower Withington, Macclesfield SK11 9FT, UKG. MainettiCentre de Calcul de l'IN2P3/CNRS, 21 avenue Pierre de Coubertin 69627 Villeurbanne Cedex, FranceO. MarggrafUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, GermanyM. MartinelliINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, 00078 Monteporzio Catone, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 2 - c/o Dipartimento di Fisica, Edificio G. Marconi, 00185 Roma, ItalyN. MartinetAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAM, Marseille, FranceF. MarulliDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "Augusto Righi" - Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, via Piero Gobetti 93/2, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyR. J. MasseyDepartment of Physics, Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UKE. MedinaceliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyS. MeiUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Astroparticule et Cosmologie, 75013 Paris, FranceCNRS-UCB International Research Laboratory, Centre Pierre Binétruy, IRL2007, CPB-IN2P3, Berkeley, USAM. MeneghettiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyE. MerlinINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Via dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, ItalyG. MeylanInstitute of Physics, Laboratory of Astrophysics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneA. MoraTelespazio UK S.L. for European Space AgencyM. MorescoDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "Augusto Righi" - Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, via Piero Gobetti 93/2, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyL. MoscardiniDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "Augusto Righi" - Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, via Piero Gobetti 93/2, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyR. NakajimaUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, GermanyS. -M. NiemiEuropean Space Agency/ESTEC, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, The NetherlandsC. PadillaInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesS. PaltaniDepartment of Astronomy, University of Geneva, ch. d'Ecogia 16, 1290 Versoix, SwitzerlandF. PasianINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyK. PedersenDARK, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 155, 2200 Copenhagen, DenmarkW. J. PercivalWaterloo Centre for Astrophysics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, CanadaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, CanadaPerimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2Y5, CanadaV. PettorinoEuropean Space Agency/ESTEC, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, The NetherlandsG. PolentaSpace Science Data Center, Italian Space Agency, via del Politecnico snc, 00133 Roma, ItalyM. PoncetCentre National d'Etudes Spatiales -- Centre spatial de Toulouse, 18 avenue Edouard Belin, 31401 Toulouse Cedex 9, FranceL. A. PopaInstitute of Space Science, Str. Atomistilor, nr. 409 Măgurele, Ilfov, 077125, RomaniaF. RaisonMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyA. RenziDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "G. Galilei", Università di Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyINFN-Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyJ. RhodesJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA, 91109, USAG. RiccioINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Via Moiariello 16, 80131 Napoli, ItalyE. RomelliINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyM. RoncarelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyR. SagliaUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, GermanyMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyZ. SakrInstituto de Física Teórica UAM-CSIC, Campus de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, SpainInstitut de Recherche en Astrophysique et PlanétologieUniversité St Joseph, Faculty of Sciences, Beirut, LebanonD. SaponeDepartamento de Física, FCFM, Universidad de Chile, Blanco Encalada 2008, Santiago, ChileB. SartorisUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, GermanyINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyP. SchneiderUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, GermanyA. SecrounAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, FranceP. SimonUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, GermanyC. SirignanoDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "G. Galilei", Università di Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyINFN-Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyG. SirriINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyL. StancoINFN-Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyP. Tallada-CrespíCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y TecnológicasPort d'Informació Científica, Campus UAB, C. Albareda s/n, 08193 BellaterraS. ToftCosmic Dawn CenterNiels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 128, 2200 Copenhagen, DenmarkR. Toledo-MoreoUniversidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Departamento de Electrónica y Tecnología de Computadoras, Plaza del Hospital 1, 30202 Cartagena, SpainEuropean University of Technology EUt+, European UnionF. TorradeflotPort d'Informació Científica, Campus UAB, C. Albareda s/n, 08193 BellaterraCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y TecnológicasI. TutusausInstitute of Space SciencesInstitut d'Estudis Espacials de CatalunyaInstitut de Recherche en Astrophysique et PlanétologieJ. ValiviitaDepartment of Physics, P.O. Box 64, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandHelsinki Institute of Physics, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandT. VassalloINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyUniversity Observatory, LMU Faculty of Physics, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 Munich, GermanyY. WangCaltech/IPAC, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USAJ. WellerUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, GermanyMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyF. M. ZerbiINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, 20122 Milano, ItalyE. ZuccaINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyV. ScottezInstitut d'Astrophysique de Paris, 98bis Boulevard Arago, 75014, Paris, FranceICL, Junia, Université Catholique de Lille, LITL, 59000 Lille, France10.1051/0004-6361/202660441http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02700v1The Life and Death of Stars That Capture Primordial Black Holes2026-06-01T18:00:00ZPrimordial black holes (PBHs) in the asteroid mass window ($10^{17}-10^{23}\,{\rm g}$) remain viable dark matter candidates and can be captured by stars. We develop the first global framework for the evolution of stars that capture PBHs, combining analytic calculations, stellar evolution models, 3D general-relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations, and Monte Carlo population synthesis. We find that the fate of these systems bifurcates: PBHs that form an accretion disk before consuming the host drive explosive disruption, whereas PBHs captured too late or growing too slowly consume the star quietly. Capture is dominated by three-body interactions with planetary or stellar companions. For a solar-type host with a Jupiter analog, inspiral within a main-sequence lifetime requires $M_{\rm BH}^{\rm crit}\gtrsim 10^{22}\,{\rm g}$, while lighter PBHs generally require tighter companions. Once deposited at the center, the PBH grows through inefficient quasi-spherical Bondi accretion; if it reaches the angular-momentum threshold before consuming the host, the inflow circularizes into a disk. Our Monte Carlo calculations yield sizable quiet-consumption and explosive-disruption populations, with final PBH masses $M_{\rm BH}\sim0.01-1\,M_\odot$ and disk-forming PBH spins $a_\ast\approx0.8$. Disk formation is the point of no return: disk winds and relativistic jets of $\sim10^{45}-10^{50}\,{\rm erg\,s^{-1}}$ disrupt the star within minutes. The resulting transients may include a $\sim$day-long UV/blue signal, radio afterglow, and, if the jet escapes, an X-ray-flash/low-luminosity gamma-ray-burst (XRF/llGRB) signal. For an $O(1)$ PBH dark matter fraction and optimistic capture assumptions, the event rate can reach that of llGRBs. The low-mass, high-spin remnants offer a complementary PBH probe and possible source for subsolar BH mergers.2026-06-01T18:00:00ZOre GottliebMatteo CantielloCameron NortonKen Van TilburgMatthew Klebanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.15414v2A Panchromatic JWST Spectrum of a Giant Starspot on the Fully Convective M-dwarf TOI-38842026-06-01T17:29:33ZTOI-3884 b is a rare super-Neptune transiting a fully convective M dwarf that hosts a persistent giant polar spot. Because the planet occults this active region during every transit, the system offers a unique laboratory to directly probe the stellar surface and spot properties. We present seven James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) transits of TOI-3884 b observed with NIRISS and NIRSpec (spanning 0.6--5.3$μ$m). While all visits show a recurring spot-crossing signature, each transit exhibits a distinct spot-crossing morphology, enabling us to infer a stellar rotation period of $P$=11.102$\pm$0.003d and tightly constrain the pole-on stellar orientation ($i_{*}$=139.2$\pm$0.3$^{\circ}$, $λ_{*}$=31.1$\pm$0.4$^{\circ}$) and spot properties ($R_{\rm{spot}}=0.576^{+0.006}_{-0.005}$R$_{*}$, $φ_{\rm{spot}}$=-84.69$\pm$0.12$^{\circ}$).We leverage this orbital configuration to measure the first empirical panchromatic spectrum of an M dwarf starspot with JWST, establishing a direct observational benchmark for stellar atmosphere models in the fully convective regime. Comparison with 1D NewEra and SPHINX atmosphere models indicates that the spot is 183$\pm$1K cooler than the photosphere, consistent with previous ground-based measurements and expectations for mid M dwarf spot contrasts. While the models reproduce the observed contrasts at wavelengths longer than 1$μ$m, they significantly underpredict the contrasts at shorter wavelengths. These results demonstrate that M dwarf stellar atmosphere models may not fully capture the wavelength dependence of stellar contamination in transmission spectra and highlight the importance of empirical spot spectra for robust interpretation of planetary atmospheres, particularly in the optical.2026-03-16T15:24:23ZC. A. Murray et al 2026 ApJL 1003 L45C. A. MurrayL. GarciaB. V. RackhamZ. Berta-ThompsonA. D. FeinsteinS. J. MercierB. CharnayL. HebbJ. E. Libby-RobertsY. RotmanA. StephensM. TimmermansL. WelbanksK. BarkaouiCaleb I. CanasM. DelamerE. DucrotS. KanodiaS. MahadevanJ. P. NinanJ. de Wit10.3847/2041-8213/ae6fb6http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02516v1On the Relationship between Solar Spicules and Propagating Coronal Disturbances: The Role of Shocks2026-06-01T17:27:09ZSpicules and propagating coronal disturbances (PCDs) are ubiquitous dynamic features of the solar atmosphere, yet their physical connection remains an open question of paramount importance to the mass and energy transport in the solar atmosphere. Using concurrent multiwavelength high-resolution observations from the Swedish 1-m Solar Telescope and the Solar Dynamics Observatory, supported with two-dimensional radiative magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations, we find that i) shock waves in the chromosphere generated from non-linear wave steepening drive some spicules, ii) in the corona, these shock waves may transition into large amplitude non-linear compressive MHD waves depending on the magnetic field strength and the ambient coronal conditions. In either case, the shocks or the large-amplitude compressive waves in the corona, also transport upward mass flux and produce intensity variations in the form of PCDs in coronal passbands. Further a multi-height wavelet analysis shows dominant $\sim$5 minute periods in the lower chromosphere that evolve into longer periods ($\ge$10 minutes) at higher atmospheric layers, consistent with dispersive propagation in a stratified medium. The observational characteristics together with the numerical simulations, demonstrate that a shock-driven MHD mechanism links spicule formation to coronal disturbances. Finally, mass flux estimates from both the observations and the simulations indicate that these PCDs can also aid in supplying mass to the solar wind.2026-06-01T17:27:09Z16 pages, 13 figures. Accepted for publication in ApJRavi ChaurasiyaSankalp SrivastavaPiyali ChatterjeeSahel DeyRobertus ErdélyiAnkala Raja Bayannahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02511v1Dyonic Quark Stars in Quasi-Topological Electromagnetism2026-06-01T17:24:38ZIn this paper we consider quark star solutions to Liu et al.'s \cite{Liu_2019} quasi-topological electromagnetism (QTEM), a recently proposed form of dark energy. Since the QTEM contribution is trivial for pure electric/magnetic charge, we consider the dyonic case in pure QTEM which does induce (dark) non-trivial dynamics from the non-linear theory. Besides the introduction of a dyonic charge distribution generally pushing the characteristic quark star `hook' shape to larger masses and radii, it also induces a second branch at very large mass and radius for stars with a small dyonic charge ratio. This second set of solutions have a negative pressure envelope surrounding a positive pressure core. As we explore the parameter space these features interact and evolve in interesting ways, with the two branches eventually merging in $M/R$ space before settling into a characteristic `paperclip' shape as the dyonic charge ratio becomes large.2026-06-01T17:24:38ZMichael GammonNicola De KockRobert B. MannAmos Kubekahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02499v1Evaluating Cepheid Metallicity Effect Determinations via IC1613 and Gaia-independent Parallaxes2026-06-01T17:05:15Z18 HST parallaxes for Galactic classical Cepheids are unified to establish a Gaia-independent IC1613 distance and evaluate metallicity effect determinations, since the Gaia zeropoint is debated. Recently proposed classical Cepheid metallicity corrections of $γ(W_{VI}) \simeq 0, -0.25, -0.50$ mag dex$^{-1}$ are benchmarked, and yield $μ_{0,{W_{VI}}} \simeq 24.39, 24.16, 23.93$ ($\pm0.07$). Larger corrections are disfavored relative to a weighted mean of IC1613 TRGB and TRGB/JAGB distances of $24.39^{+0.07}_{-0.04}$ (EDD) and $24.36\pm0.06$/$24.45\pm0.11$ (CCHP). A more expansive metallicity baseline is desirable to scrutinize smaller corrections (e.g., $γ(W_{VI}) \lesssim -0.1$ mag dex$^{-1}$), while concurrently acquiring additional non-Gaia parallaxes since published concerns exist regarding DR3 (e.g., critical long-period Cepheids S Vul, SV Vul).2026-06-01T17:05:15ZTo appear in publicationDaniel Majaesshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02473v1Orbit Refinement of WASP-18 b and Evidence Against the Existence of WASP-18 c2026-06-01T16:45:34ZWe present an updated transit ephemeris for the exoplanet WASP-18 b and critically examine the existence of a proposed second planet, WASP-18 c. Using 205 transit light curves from TESS, CHEOPS, Exoplanet Watch, Exoplanet Transit Database and previous literature, we derive a refined mid-transit time of 2460933.096346 +/- 0.000022 BJD_TDB and an orbital period of 0.94145252 +/- 1.1 x 10^-8 days for WASP-18 b. Our forward-propagated ephemeris to January 1, 2030, shows a timing uncertainty of 2.41 seconds. This high-precision refinement serves as a robust baseline to test for Transit Timing Variations (TTVs), ensuring that any reported deviations are not artifacts of an insufficiently constrained orbital period. In addition, we analyze 449 radial velocity (RV) measurements from the CORALIE, HARPS, PFS, HIRES and ESPRESSO spectrographs to search for signatures of WASP-18 c, a previously proposed additional planetary companion, and also estimated the k2 love number as 0.62199 +/- 0.0011. However, we do not find significant variations in either transit timing or RV data that support the presence of WASP-18 c. Moreover, the most significantly identified periodicities are not consistently measured across the transit or RV datasets, strongly arguing against the existence of a dynamically relevant second planet in the system. Our results indicate that the claimed WASP-18 c signal is likely spurious in nature. Overall, this work enhances our understanding of the WASP-18 system and provides a valuable resource for future observational campaigns with the refinement of the b planet orbit and falsified status of the previously defined c planet.2026-06-01T16:45:34Z17 pages, 7 figures, 5 tables, accepted for publication in The Astronomical JournalAvinash Salguneswaran NediyedathKyle A. PearsonTara FetherolfAndre O. Kovacshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02457v1Size limits on tidal debris around white dwarfs: the km-size barrier2026-06-01T16:30:31ZCompact disks of planetary debris orbiting white dwarfs provide a crucial window into our understanding of evolved planetary systems. The formation of these disks has been widely modeled with tidal fragmentation of minor planets that are rubble piles with no internal strength. However, rubble piles do have non-zero cohesive strength from Van der Waals forces, and here we demonstrate the consequences: breakup of these rubble piles sets a maximum fragment size, and we calculate this size \jks{for water ice, iron, and material densities corresponding to the lunar highlands, Vesta and the Earth}. We find that for typical minimum rubble pile strengths of $\sim$10-1000 Pa, the maximum fragment size is as large as small asteroids (0.1-1 km). This limit -- the km-size barrier -- also represents the characteristic sizes of tidal fragments. Most of the debris mass is contained in fragments of this size. Consequently, subsequent disk evolution should first feature a prominent dust-forming process, such as collisional grinding, before Poynting-Robertson drag can significantly shape the final disk. \jks{Further, we find that non-zero internal strength more narrowly radially confines the fragments than in the strengthless case.} This correction to previous assumptions adds to the growing evidence of the importance of collisions in the formation and evolution of white dwarf debris disks, while also helping to bound the size distribution in these disks for modeling efforts.2026-06-01T16:30:31Z11 pages. Accepted for PublicationJordan K. SteckloffDimitri VerasKathryn Volkhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02445v1Counterintuitive Magnetic Connectivity and Energetic Particle Flux Differences among Nearby Spacecraft During the 2023 February 24 Solar Energetic Particle Event2026-06-01T16:16:15ZFor solar energetic particles (SEPs), it is generally expected that observers magnetically closer to the eruption source region exhibit higher particle intensities than those poorly connected to the eruption site. However, the 2023 February 24 SEP event departs from this simple picture: Earth and STA, near 1 au, are nominally better connected to the source region, whereas Solar Orbiter (SolO), at 0.77 au but less favorably connected, observed SEP fluxes more than an order of magnitude higher. This difference cannot be simply explained by nominal magnetic connectivity or radial scaling of SEP fluxes alone. To investigate this behavior, we perform a global magnetohydrodynamic simulation of the associated coronal mass ejection (CME) using the Alfvén Wave Solar-atmosphere Model-Realtime (AWSoM-R). The simulation reveals that the CME flux rope originates close to a coronal streamer and as it propagates and expands, the CME-driven shock is effectively distorted, developing into two distinct flanks with different strengths. Although the three spacecraft are separated by only $\lesssim$30$^{\circ}$ in heliolongitude, their magnetic footpoints differ by $\gtrsim$50$^{\circ}$ in longitude because of a nearby stream interaction region. Specifically, Earth and STA connect to a weaker shock region, while SolO connects to the shock nose with a higher compression ratio and more efficient particle acceleration. We further simulate SEPs using the Multiple-Field-Line Advection Model for Particle Acceleration (M-FLAMPA) coupled with AWSoM-R, obtaining results that reproduce the observed flux differences among the three spacecraft, demonstrating that this counterintuitive behavior results from their connections to different regions of the inhomogeneous CME-driven shock.2026-06-01T16:16:15Z22 pages, 10 figures, 1 tableWeihao LiuXianyu LiuDavid LarioLulu ZhaoTamas I. GombosiAlexander D. ShaneIgor V. Sokolovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02431v1Regression on Regression: Mapping Data-Driven Binary Black Hole Merger Rate Fits to Progenitor Histories2026-06-01T16:06:10ZThe binary black hole (BBH) merger rate is governed by the progenitor formation rate and the distribution of delay-times between formation and merger, but these functions remain poorly constrained. We introduce a framework that maps the parameters of physics-driven models directly onto existing data-driven fits of the BBH merger rate. This ``regression on regression'' approach enables physical interpretation of flexible population models without the computational burden of reanalyzing the underlying gravitational-wave event data. Applying this method to the \textsc{B-Spline} merger-rate posteriors from the Fourth Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog, we fit the minimum delay time ($τ_{\text{min}}$), delay-time power-law index ($α$), and progenitor formation parameters controlling the normalization ($\mathcal{A}$), early-time growth ($γ$), and late-time decay ($δ$). Increasing the number of anchoring redshift points from two to four reduces the median sum-squared error (SSE) by a factor of $\approx 4.5$. However, residuals reveal that the physical model does not pass through all four anchors, exposing model misspecification and demonstrating a key strength of the framework: unlike standard inference methods, which preferentially weight compatible curves and mask underlying tensions, our approach exposes BBH posteriors irreconcilable with the model. Despite uncertainties at $z\gtrsim1$, the shape of the progenitor formation rate at low-$z$ is robust and evolves more steeply than the global star formation rate (SFR), supporting a preference for low metallicity environments. Specifically, the log-space slope of the progenitor rate is $\approx 5.3$ times steeper than the SFR between $z=0.1$ and $z=1.0$. Ultimately, a more complex phenomenological model is required to match the \textsc{B-Spline} merger rates.2026-06-01T16:06:10Z10 pages, 5 figures, submitted to PRDEmma BlanchetAryanna Schiebelbein-ZwackMaya Fishbachhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02413v1Modeling the Thermal Low-Frequency Radio Sun with Ray Tracing2026-06-01T15:56:46ZIncoherent radio emission at meter--decimeter wavelengths provides a key diagnostic of the coronal thermal plasma, but at frequencies below $\sim$\,1\,GHz coronal refraction can substantially bend ray paths and modify the apparent source size and brightness distribution. We develop a forward-modeling framework that combines refractive ray tracing through a global 3D coronal model with radiative transfer along each ray. The method tracks the ray-tube cross-sectional area $S(s)$ using a step-wise perturbation retracing approach and incorporates a geometric magnification term proportional to $d\ln S/ds$ to enforce flux conservation under focusing/defocusing. Thermal free--free emission and absorption are then computed with the \texttt{GRFF} radiative transfer code to produce synthetic radio maps over 40--800\,MHz. Applying the framework to Carrington rotation 2298, we find that including propagation effects allows the quiet-Sun background spectrum to be well reproduced. However, active region brightness is less accurately modeled, suggesting that additional physical factors should be considered in future work. These results establish a physics-based method for generating low-frequency quiet-Sun synthetic images suitable for quantitative comparison with interferometric observations and for assessing how propagation effects shape the observed morphology.2026-06-01T15:56:46ZPeijin ZhangBin ChenGregory FleishmanAlexey KuznetsovCooper DownsSurajit MondalSijie Yuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02330v1Solar vortex detection methods in MHD simulations: impact of magnetic field and spatial resolution2026-06-01T14:41:45ZThe aim of this paper is to investigate the influence of different magnetic field configurations and spatial resolutions on vortex structures. We analyzed a set of six three-dimensional realistic simulations of the solar atmosphere under three different magnetic field configurations: a small-scale dynamo and two initially vertical implanted magnetic fields of 50 G and 200 G. Three different spatial resolutions have been employed: 20x20x14, 10x10x7 and 5x5x3.5 km^3. We applied two vortex detection methods based on the velocity gradient tensor to all of the models: swirling strength and the SWIRL code. We performed a comparison of vortex locations obtained with both methods, and a statistical analyses of the vortex generation mechanisms, the area covered by vortices, their number and characteristic sizes, and temperature profiles as a function of height. We have confirmed that different magnetic field configurations and spatial resolutions impact the area coverage, number, and sizes of vortices. Likewise, the detection methods impact the statistics obtained. Swirling strength detects vortices with any orientation but a height-dependent threshold is needed. SWIRL only detects vertically-oriented vortices but shows a better agreement with the rotating horizontal velocity field. Simulations with a vertical magnetic field of 50 G support the formation of chromospheric vortices without a photospheric counterpart, while most of the vortices in the 200 G model directly connect the photosphere with the chromosphere. Small-scale dynamo simulations are characterized by a large number of horizontal vortices, with vertical vortices being nearly absent at chromospheric layers. Temperature profiles of vortices confirm that they are hotter than their surroundings, regardless the simulation setup.2026-06-01T14:41:45ZAccepted for publication in A&A, 17 pages, 10 figuresM. Koll PistariniE. KhomenkoT. FelipeM. Modestovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31528v2Harmonics as a Hidden Window into the Turbulent Convective Envelope of non-Blazhko RRab Stars2026-06-01T14:19:50ZHarmonics in pulsating stars have traditionally been regarded as mere Fourier artifacts, fully determined by their parent mode. Recent observations of high-amplitude $δ$ Scuti stars, however, have revealed the existence of disharmonized harmonics, which exhibit amplitude and frequency variations uncorrelated with their parent pulsation mode. Here we test the universality of this phenomenon by examining a class of stars long considered pulsationally stable: non-Blazhko RRab stars. Using short-cadence {\it Kepler} photometric data, we not only identify a distinct hump structure formed by harmonics of the primary pulsation mode in their frequency spectra, but also find significant amplitude and frequency variations associated with the harmonics around the onset and in the tail of the hump structure. These findings are consistent with the interpretation that the hump structure originates from the turbulent convective envelope of the star. Interestingly, several important phenomena can be understood within this framework as a working hypothesis. Thus, the hump structure of harmonics and their intrinsic variability could constitute a hidden window into the stellar convective envelope, potentially tracing energy injection at the convection-pulsation interaction and stochastic perturbations from turbulent convection -- although detailed modeling is required to confirm this interpretation.2026-05-29T16:41:08Z9 pages, 5 figures, 2 tables. Accepted for publication by A&A LetterJia-Shu Niuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.02229v1The light curve of T Cephei: humps, long-term changes and recent phenomena2026-06-01T13:25:32ZThe long-period Mira variable T Cephei has been observed for nearly 150 years, during which more than 130 cycles have been recorded. Using visual observations from the AAVSO database, maxima, minima, pulsation periods, amplitudes and hump characteristics were estimated for 136 cycles from the late nineteenth century to 2026.
Most cycles display a temporary slowing of the rise to maximum light ("humps"). These humps show significant cycle-to-cycle persistence in occurrence, duration and brightness, and are more likely to occur during high-amplitude cycles. Hump onset magnitudes exhibit a lower limit near V ~ 9.3, with many humps beginning near V ~ 8. Cycles with larger amplitudes/deeper minima tend to have humps which are dimmer and more gradual.
Comparison with published spectroscopy supports the interpretation that the humps are associated with changes in TiO-dominated molecular opacity within the stellar atmosphere. A qualitative model involving secondary pressure waves traversing TiO-rich layers is proposed to account for the observed hump morphology and its variability.
The most recent cycles of T Cep have shown unprecedented behaviour. Pulsation amplitudes have fallen to historically low values, the maximum-to-maximum period has shortened substantially, and the light curve has become increasingly asymmetric. In Cycle 139, a substantial hump appeared on the descending branch, a phenomenon never before observed in T Cep. Similarities with the Mira variable T UMi raise the possibility that these recent changes may be due to evolutionary developments.2026-06-01T13:25:32ZMike Goldsmithhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.20314v2Shortest period for outer orbit in compact hierarchical triple? Discovery of SB1 around V0885 Per2026-06-01T11:43:22ZI present a discovery of SB1 in the LAMOST MRS spectra of eclipsing contact binary V 0885 Per. Spectroscopic orbit has period only $P=21.8$ day, which will make it shortest known outer period in compact hierarchical triple system, if this SB1 is indeed bound to the inner system. Unfortunately quality of available spectra don't allow to give definitive answer to this question, although other explanation like a chance alignment seems to be unlikely.2026-04-22T08:12:26Zsubmitted to AJMikhail KovalevYNAO