https://arxiv.org/api/moCU0iLE0pjecYee9ZLdGf9+qMs 2026-06-11T04:28:23Z 35924 435 15 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11740v1 2026-05-12T08:19:18Z

Advanced adaptive optics (AO) systems can use Fourier-type wavefront sensing to correct optical distortions encountered in ground-based telescopes, AO-assisted retinal imaging, and free-space optical communications (FSOC). Recently, a novel Fourier-type wavefront sensor (WFS) known as the iQuad WFS has been introduced. Its design features a focal plane tessellation with a four-quadrant phase mask (FQPM) that incorporates a $\pm π/2$ phase shift between adjacent quadrants. In this work, we establish a comprehensive mathematical framework for the iQuad WFS, including its forward models and linearizations based on the Fréchet derivative. We reveal a connection between the iQuad WFS and the 2d finite Hilbert transform and demonstrate that the linear iQuad WFS operator is self-adjoint - a unique property among Fourier-type WFSs. Additionally, we introduce the double iQuad WFS, a two-path configuration that combines two rotated iQuad WFSs. This design addresses the limitations of the single iQuad WFS by suppressing poorly-seen phase components. Moreover, the double setup simplifies the mathematical modeling. We also highlight iQuad similarities to the widely used pyramid wavefront sensor (PWFS). Finally, we extend the concept of modulation to the iQuad WFS, further enhancing its versatility. The theoretical analysis presented here lays the groundwork for the development of fast and robust model-based wavefront reconstruction algorithms for the iQuad WFS, paving the way for future applications in AO instruments.

2026-05-12T08:19:18Z Victoria Laidlaw Olivier Fauvarque Alfred Miksch Benoit Neichel Ronny Ramlau http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11703v1 2026-05-12T07:58:35Z

GW240925 and GW250207 are two loud gravitational-wave signals from binary black hole coalescences observed with network signal-to-noise ratios $\sim 32$ and $\sim 69$, respectively, by the LIGO Hanford--LIGO Livingston--Virgo network. Gravitational-wave signals from coalescing binaries have characteristic phase and amplitude evolution predicted by general relativity. These signal waveforms, together with measured instrumental calibration uncertainties, are used to infer source parameters. However, for sufficiently loud detections it is possible to constrain the calibration of the detectors directly using the signals themselves. We present the first informative astrophysical measurements of gravitational-wave detector calibration. For GW240925, we verify the inference of Hanford calibration from the astrophysical signal through cross-checks with known calibration errors obtained from in-situ measurements. At the time of GW250207, the Hanford detector was not fully stabilized, leading to elevated calibration uncertainties; thus, astrophysical calibration is essential to obtain accurate data and to enable source localization. These well-localized, high signal-to-noise observations have the potential to offer precise measurements of source properties, stringent tests of general relativity, and informative dark siren measurements, provided that calibration uncertainties are properly incorporated. As detector sensitivity improves, astrophysical calibration will become an increasingly valuable complement to in-situ calibration measurements. Obtaining accurate calibration will be essential for precision gravitational-wave science.

2026-05-12T07:58:35Z 37 pages (11 pages author list, 7 pages main paper, 8 pages references, 11 pages supplemental material), 15 figures (4 in main text, 11 in supplemental material); accepted for publication in Physical Review Letters; data products available from https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18600070 The LIGO Scientific Collaboration the Virgo Collaboration the KAGRA Collaboration A. G. Abac I. Abouelfettouh F. Acernese K. Ackley A. Adam C. Adamcewicz S. Adhicary D. Adhikari N. Adhikari R. X. Adhikari V. K. Adkins S. Afroz A. Agapito D. Agarwal M. Agathos N. Aggarwal S. Aggarwal O. D. Aguiar I. -L. Ahrend L. Aiello A. Ain P. Ajith T. Akutsu S. Albanesi L. Albers W. Ali S. Al-Kershi C. Alléné A. Allocca S. Al-Shammari P. A. Altin S. Alvarez-Lopez W. Amar O. Amarasinghe A. Amato F. Amicucci C. Amra C. Anand A. Ananyeva S. B. Anderson W. G. Anderson M. Andia M. Ando M. Andrés-Carcasona J. L. Andrey T. Andrić J. Anglin J. Anna S. Ansoldi J. M. Antelis S. Antier M. Aoumi E. Z. Appavuravther S. Appert S. K. Apple K. Arai A. Araya M. C. Araya M. Arca Sedda F. Arciprete J. S. Areeda N. Aritomi F. Armato S. Armstrong N. Arnaud M. Arogeti S. M. Aronson K. G. Arun G. Ashton Y. Aso L. Asprea M. Assiduo S. Assis de Souza Melo S. M. Aston P. Astone F. Attadio F. Aubin K. AultONeal G. Avallone E. A. Avila S. Babak C. Badger S. Bae S. Bagnasco L. Baiotti R. Bajpai T. Baka K. A. Baker T. Baker G. Balbi G. Baldi N. Baldicchi M. Ball G. Ballardin S. W. Ballmer S. Banagiri B. Banerjee D. Bankar T. M. Baptiste P. Baral M. Baratti J. C. Barayoga K. Baric B. C. Barish D. Barker N. Barman P. Barneo F. Barone B. Barr M. Barrios L. Barsotti M. Barsuglia D. Barta M. A. Barton I. Bartos A. Basalaev R. Bassiri A. Basti M. Bawaj P. Baxi J. C. Bayley A. C. Baylor P. A. Baynard M. Bazzan V. M. Bedakihale F. Beirnaert M. Bejger D. Belardinelli A. S. Bell C. Bellani L. Bellizzi D. Beltran-Martinez W. Benoit I. Bentara M. Ben Yaala S. Bera F. Bergamin B. K. Berger S. Bernuzzi M. Beroiz C. P. L. Berry I. Berry D. Bersanetti T. Bertheas A. Bertolini J. Betzwieser D. Beveridge G. Bevilacqua N. Bevins R. Bhandare R. Bhatt A. Bhattacharjee D. Bhattacharjee S. Bhattacharyya S. Bhaumik V. Biancalana A. Bianchi F. Bianchi I. A. Bilenko G. Billingsley A. Binetti S. Bini C. Binu S. Biot O. Birnholtz S. Biscoveanu A. Bisht M. Bitossi M. -A. Bizouard S. Blaber J. K. Blackburn L. A. Blagg C. D. Blair D. G. Blair N. Bode N. Boettner P. Bogdan G. Boileau M. Boldrini G. N. Bolingbroke A. Bolliand L. D. Bonavena R. Bondarescu F. Bondu V. A. Bonhomme E. Bonilla M. S. Bonilla A. Bonino R. Bonnand A. Borchers N. Borghi V. Boschi S. Bose V. Bossilkov Y. Bothra A. Boudon M. Boyle A. Bozzi C. Bradaschia M. J. Brady P. R. Brady A. Branch M. Branchesi T. Briant A. Brillet M. Brinkmann P. Brockill E. Brockmueller A. F. Brooks B. C. Brown D. D. Brown M. L. Brozzetti S. Brunett G. Bruno R. Bruntz J. Bryant Y. Bu F. Bucci J. Buchanan O. Bulashenko T. Bulik H. J. Bulten A. Buonanno K. Burtnyk R. Buscicchio D. Buskulic C. Buy R. L. Byer R. Cabrita V. Cáceres-Barbosa L. Cadonati G. Cagnoli C. Cahillane A. Calafat T. A. Callister E. Calloni S. R. Callos M. Canepa G. Caneva Santoro K. C. Cannon H. Cao L. A. Capistran E. Capocasa G. Capoccia E. Capote G. Capurri G. Carapella F. Carbognani K. J. Cardona-Martínez M. Carlassara J. B. Carlin T. K. Carlson M. F. Carney M. Carpinelli G. Carrillo J. J. Carter G. Carullo A. Casallas-Lagos J. Casanueva Diaz C. Casentini S. Caudill M. Cavaglià R. Cavalieri G. Cella S. Cepic P. Cerdá-Durán E. Cesarini N. Chabbra W. Chaibi A. Chakraborty P. Chakraborty S. Chakraborty S. Chalathadka Subrahmanya R. Chalmers C. Chan J. C. L. Chan M. Chan K. Chang P. Charlton E. Chassande-Mottin C. Chatterjee Debarati Chatterjee Deep Chatterjee M. Chaturvedi S. Chaty K. Chatziioannou A. Chen A. H. -Y. Chen D. Chen H. Chen H. Y. Chen S. Chen Y. Chen G. Cheng H. P. Cheng P. Chessa T. Cheunchitra H. T. Cheung S. Y. Cheung F. Chiadini G. Chiarini A. Chiba A. Chincarini D. Chintala M. L. Chiofalo A. Chiummo C. Chou S. Choudhary N. Christensen S. S. Y. Chua G. Ciani P. Ciecielag M. Cieślar M. Cifaldi B. Cirok F. Clara J. A. Clark T. A. Clarke P. Clearwater S. Clesse F. Cleva S. M. Clyne E. Coccia E. Codazzo P. -F. Cohadon D. E. Cohen S. Colace E. Colangeli O. Cole M. Colleoni C. G. Collette J. Collins S. Colloms A. Colombo C. M. Compton G. Connolly L. Conti T. R. Corbitt I. Cordero-Carrión S. Corezzi N. J. Cornish I. Coronado A. Corsi L. A. Corubolo L. Cotnoir R. Cottingham M. W. Coughlin P. Couvares D. M. Coward D. C. Coyne R. Coyne A. Cozzumbo J. D. E. Creighton T. D. Creighton S. Crook R. Crouch J. Csizmazia J. R. Cudell T. J. Cullen A. Cumming E. Cuoco M. Cusinato L. V. Da Conceição T. Dal Canton S. Dall'Osso S. Dal Pra G. Dálya O. Dan Y. Dang B. D'Angelo S. Danilishin S. D'Antonio K. Danzmann K. E. Darroch L. P. Dartez R. Das A. Dasgupta V. Dattilo A. Daumas I. Dave A. Davenport M. Davier T. F. Davies D. Davis L. Davis M. C. Davis P. Davis E. J. Daw M. Dax J. De Bolle M. Deenadayalan J. Degallaix M. De Laurentis C. J. Delgado Mendez F. De Lillo S. Della Torre W. Del Pozzo O. M. del Rio A. Demagny F. De Marco G. Demasi F. De Matteis N. Demos T. Dent A. Depasse N. DePergola R. De Pietri R. De Rosa C. De Rossi M. Desai V. Deshmukh R. De Simone S. Determan A. Dhani R. Dhurkunde R. Diab C. Diaz M. C. Díaz M. Di Cesare G. Dideron T. Dietrich L. Di Fiore C. Di Fronzo M. Di Giovanni T. Di Girolamo D. Diksha J. Ding S. Di Pace I. Di Palma D. Di Piero F. Di Renzo Divyajyoti A. Dmitriev J. P. Docherty Z. Doctor N. Doerksen E. Dohmen A. Doke A. Domiciano De Souza L. D'Onofrio F. Donovan K. L. Dooley T. Dooney S. Doravari O. Dorosh F. Dosopoulou W. J. D. Doyle M. Drago J. C. Driggers M. Dubois R. R. Dumbreck L. Dunn U. Dupletsa D. D'Urso P. Dutta Roy H. Duval P. -A. Duverne S. E. Dwyer C. Eassa M. Eberhardt M. Ebersold T. Eckhardt G. Eddolls A. Effler J. Eichholz H. Einsle M. Eisenmann R. A. Eisenstein M. Emma K. Endo R. Enficiaud L. Errico R. Espinosa M. Esposito R. C. Essick H. Estellés T. Etzel M. Evans T. Evstafyeva B. E. Ewing J. M. Ezquiaga F. Fabrizi V. Fafone S. Fairhurst X. Fan A. M. Farah B. Farr W. M. Farr M. Favata M. Fays M. Fazio J. Feicht M. M. Fejer J. -N. Feldhusen E. Fenyvesi J. Fernandes T. Fernandes D. Fernando S. Ferraiuolo T. A. Ferreira M. Ferrer F. Fidecaro P. Figura E. Finch A. Fiori I. Fiori M. Fishbach R. P. Fisher R. Fittipaldi V. Fiumara R. Flaminio S. M. Fleischer L. S. Fleming E. Floden H. Fong J. A. Font F. Fontinele-Nunes C. Foo B. Fornal P. W. F. Forsyth K. Franceschetti A. Franco-Ordovas F. Frappez S. Frasca F. Frasconi J. P. Freed Z. Frei A. Freise O. Freitas R. Frey W. Frischhertz P. Fritschel V. V. Frolov M. Fuentes-Garcia S. Fujii T. Fujimori P. Fulda M. Fyffe B. Gadre J. R. Gair S. Galaudage V. Galdi R. Gamba A. Gamboa S. Gamoji A. Ganguly B. Garaventa P. García Abia J. García-Bellido C. García-Quirós J. W. Gardner S. Garg J. Gargiulo X. Garrido A. Garron F. Garufi P. A. Garver C. Gasbarra B. Gateley F. Gautier V. Gayathri T. Gayer G. Gemme A. Gennai V. Gennari J. George R. George O. Gerberding L. Gergely Archisman Ghosh Sayantan Ghosh Shaon Ghosh Shrobana Ghosh Suprovo Ghosh Tathagata Ghosh J. A. Giaime K. D. Giardina D. R. Gibson C. Gier S. Gkaitatzis J. Glanzer F. Glotin J. Godfrey R. V. Godley P. Godwin A. S. Goettel E. Goetz J. Golomb S. Gomez Lopez G. González P. Goodarzi S. Goode A. Goodwin-Jones M. Gosselin C. Gostiaux R. Gouaty D. W. Gould K. Govorkova A. Grado A. E. Granados M. Granata V. Granata S. Gras P. Grassia C. Gray R. Gray G. Greco A. C. Green L. Green S. M. Green S. R. Green A. M. Gretarsson E. M. Gretarsson H. K. Griffin D. Griffith H. L. Griggs G. Grignani C. Grimaud H. Grote S. Grunewald D. Guerra A. G. Guerrero D. Guetta G. M. Guidi T. Guidry H. K. Gulati F. Gulminelli A. M. Gunny H. Guo W. Guo Y. Guo Anuradha Gupta I. Gupta N. C. Gupta S. K. Gupta V. Gupta N. Gupte J. Gurs N. Gutierrez N. Guttman F. Guzman D. Haba M. Haberland S. Haino E. D. Hall E. Z. Hamilton G. Hammond M. Haney J. Hanks C. Hanna M. D. Hannam O. A. Hannuksela H. Hansen J. Hanson R. Harada A. R. Hardison S. Harikumar K. Haris I. Harley-Trochimczyk T. Harmark J. Harms G. M. Harry I. W. Harry J. Hart M. T. Hartman B. Haskell C. -J. Haster K. Haughian H. Hayakawa K. Hayama A. Heffernan D. Hegde M. C. Heintze J. Heinze J. Heinzel H. Heitmann F. Hellman A. F. Helmling-Cornell G. Hemming O. Henderson-Sapir M. Hendry I. S. Heng M. H. Hennig C. Henshaw M. Heurs A. L. Hewitt J. Heynen J. Heyns S. Higginbotham S. Hild S. Hill Y. Himemoto N. Hirata C. Hirose D. Hofman B. E. Hogan N. A. Holland K. Holley-Bockelmann I. J. Hollows D. E. Holz L. Honet K. M. Hoops M. E. Hoque D. J. Horton-Bailey J. Hough S. Hourihane N. T. Howard E. J. Howell C. G. Hoy C. A. Hrishikesh P. Hsi H. -F. Hsieh H. -Y. Hsieh C. Hsiung S. -H. Hsu W. -F. Hsu Q. Hu H. Y. Huang Y. Huang Y. T. Huang A. D. Huddart B. Hughey V. Hui S. Husa L. Iampieri G. A. Iandolo M. Ianni G. Iannone J. Iascau K. Ide R. Iden A. Ierardi S. Ikeda H. Imafuku Y. Inoue G. Iorio P. Iosif J. Irwin R. Ishikawa T. Ishikawa M. Isi K. S. Isleif Y. Itoh S. Iwaguchi M. Iwaya B. R. Iyer C. D. Jackson C. Jacquet P. -E. Jacquet T. Jacquot S. J. Jadhav S. P. Jadhav M. Jain T. Jain A. L. James K. Jani J. Janquart N. N. Janthalur S. Jaraba P. Jaranowski R. Jaume W. Javed M. Jensen W. Jia J. Jiang H. -B. Jin G. R. Johns N. A. Johnson N. K. Johnson-McDaniel R. Johnston N. Johny D. H. Jones D. I. Jones R. Jones H. E. Jose P. Joshi S. K. Joshi G. Joubert J. Ju L. Ju I. L. Juarez-Reyes K. Jung J. Junker V. Juste H. B. Kabagoz T. Kajita I. Kaku V. Kalogera M. Kalomenopoulos M. Kamiizumi N. Kanda S. Kandhasamy G. Kang J. B. Kanner S. A. KantiMahanty S. J. Kapadia D. P. Kapasi M. Karthikeyan M. Kasprzack H. Kato T. Kato E. Katsavounidis W. Katzman R. Kaushik K. Kawabe R. Kawamoto D. Keitel S. A. Kemper L. J. Kemperman J. Kennington F. A. Kerkow R. Kesharwani J. S. Key R. Khadela S. Khadka S. S. Khadkikar F. Y. Khalili F. Khan T. Khanam M. Khursheed N. M. Khusid W. Kiendrebeogo N. Kijbunchoo C. Kim J. C. Kim K. Kim M. H. Kim S. Kim Y. -M. Kim C. Kimball K. Kimes M. Kinnear J. S. Kissel S. Klimenko A. M. Knee E. J. Knox N. Knust K. Kobayashi S. M. Koehlenbeck G. Koekoek K. Kohri K. Kokeyama S. Koley P. Kolitsidou A. E. Koloniari K. Komori K. Kompanets A. K. H. Kong A. Kontos K. Kopczuk L. M. Koponen M. Korobko X. Kou A. Koushik N. Kouvatsos M. Kovalam T. Koyama D. B. Kozak E. Kraja S. L. Kranzhoff V. Kringel N. V. Krishnendu S. Kroker A. Królak K. Kruska J. Kubisz G. Kuehn A. Kulur Ramamohan Achal Kumar Anil Kumar Praveen Kumar Prayush Kumar Rahul Kumar Rakesh Kumar Saurabh Kumar J. Kume K. Kuns N. Kuntimaddi S. Kuroyanagi S. Kuwahara K. Kwak K. Kwan S. Kwon G. Lacaille D. Laghi A. H. Laity A. Lakhal E. Lalande M. Lalleman S. Lalvani M. Landry R. N. Lang J. Lange R. Langgin B. Lantz I. La Rosa A. Lartaux-Vollard P. D. Lasky L. Lavezzi J. Lawrence M. Laxen C. Lazarte A. Lazzarini C. Lazzaro P. Leaci L. Leali Y. K. Lecoeuche H. W. Lee J. Lee K. Lee R. -K. Lee R. Lee Sungho Lee Sunjae Lee Y. Lee Y. S. C. Lee I. N. Legred J. Lehmann L. Lehner M. Le Jean A. Lemaître M. Lenti M. Leonardi M. Lequime N. Leroy M. Lesovsky N. Letendre M. Lethuillier S. E. Levin Y. Levin S. Lexmond K. Leyde K. L. Li T. G. F. Li X. Li Y. Li Z. Li Q. Liang A. Lihos E. T. Lin F. Lin L. C. -C. Lin Y. -C. Lin C. Lindsay S. D. Linker A. Liu G. C. Liu Jian Liu S. Liu F. Llamas Villarreal J. Llobera-Querol R. K. L. Lo J. -P. Locquet S. C. G. Loggins M. R. Loizou L. T. London A. Longo D. Lopez M. Lopez Portilla A. Lorenzo-Medina V. Loriette M. Lormand G. Losurdo E. Lotti T. P. Lott J. D. Lough H. A. Loughlin C. O. Lousto N. K. Y Low N. Lu L. Lucchesi H. Lück O. Lukina D. Lumaca A. P. Lundgren L. Lunghini A. W. Lussier S. Ma X. Ma D. M. Macleod I. A. O. MacMillan A. Macquet S. S. Madekar K. Maeda S. Maenaut S. S. Magare R. M. Magee E. Maggio R. Maggiore M. Magnozzi P. Mahapatra M. Mahesh S. Majhi E. Majorana C. N. Makarem E. Makelele D. Malakar J. A. Malaquias-Reis U. Mali S. Maliakal A. Malik L. Mallick A. -K. Malz N. Man M. Mancarella V. Mandic V. Mangano B. Mannix G. L. Mansell M. Manske M. Mantovani M. Mapelli S. Marchetti C. Marinelli F. Marion A. S. Markosyan A. Markowitz E. Maros S. Marsat F. Martelli I. W. Martin R. M. Martin B. B. Martinez D. A. Martinez M. Martinez V. Martinez A. Martini J. C. Martins D. V. Martynov E. J. Marx L. Massaro A. Masserot M. Masso-Reid T. Masters S. Mastrogiovanni G. Mastropasqua T. Matcovich M. Matiushechkina A. Matte-Landry L. Maurin N. Mavalvala N. Maxwell G. McCarrol R. McCarthy D. E. McClelland S. McCormick L. McCuller L. I. McDermott S. McEachin C. McElhenny G. I. McGhee K. B. M. McGowan J. McIver A. McLeod T. McRae R. McTeague D. Meacher B. N. Meagher R. Mechum Q. Meijer A. Melatos C. S. Menoni F. Mera R. A. Mercer L. Mereni K. Merfeld E. L. Merilh G. Merino J. R. Mérou J. D. Merritt M. Merzougui C. Messick B. Mestichelli M. Meyer-Conde F. Meylahn A. Mhaske A. Miani H. Miao I. Michaloliakos C. Michel Y. Michimura H. Middleton D. P. Mihaylov S. J. Miller M. Millhouse E. Milotti V. Milotti Y. Minenkov E. M. Minihan Ll. M. Mir L. Mirasola C. -A. Miritescu A. Mishra C. Mishra T. Mishra A. L. Mitchell J. G. Mitchell O. Mitchem S. Mitra V. P. Mitrofanov K. Mitsuhashi R. Mittleman O. Miyakawa S. Miyoki G. Mo L. Mobilia S. R. P. Mohapatra S. R. Mohite M. Molina-Ruiz M. Mondin M. Montani C. J. Moore D. Moraru A. More S. More C. Moreno E. A. Moreno G. Moreno A. Moreso Serra C. Morgan S. Morisaki Y. Moriwaki G. Morras A. Moscatello M. Mould B. Mours C. M. Mow-Lowry L. Muccillo F. Muciaccia Arunava Mukherjee D. Mukherjee Samanwaya Mukherjee Soma Mukherjee Subroto Mukherjee Suvodip Mukherjee N. Mukund A. Mullavey A. R. Muller C. L. Mungioli M. Murakoshi P. G. Murray D. Nabari S. L. Nadji S. Nadji A. Nagar N. Nagarajan K. Nakagaki K. Nakamura H. Nakano M. Nakano D. Nanadoumgar-Lacroze D. Nandi V. Napolano S. U. Naqvi P. Narayan I. Nardecchia T. Narikawa H. Narola L. Naticchioni R. K. Nayak J. Neeson L. Negri A. Nela C. Nelle A. Nelson T. J. N. Nelson A. Nemmani M. Nery A. Neunzert M. Newell S. Ng L. Nguyen Quynh A. B. Nielsen Y. Nishino A. Nishizawa S. Nissanke W. Niu F. Nocera J. Noller M. Norman C. North J. Novak R. Nowicki J. F. Nuño Siles G. Nurbek L. K. Nuttall K. Obayashi J. Oberling C. E. Ochoa J. O'Dell M. Oertel G. Oganesyan T. O'Hanlon M. Ohashi F. Ohme I. Oke R. Omer B. O'Neal M. Onishi K. Oohara B. O'Reilly M. Orselli R. O'Shaughnessy S. Oshino C. Osthelder I. Ota G. Othman D. J. Ottaway A. Ouzriat H. Overmier B. J. Owen R. Ozaki A. E. Pace R. Pagano M. A. Page A. Pai L. Paiella A. Pal S. Pal M. A. Palaia M. Pálfi P. P. Palma C. Palomba P. Palud H. Pan J. Pan K. -C. Pan P. K. Panda Shiksha Pandey Swadha Pandey P. T. H. Pang F. Pannarale K. A. Pannone B. C. Pant F. H. Panther M. Panzeri F. Paoletti A. Paolone A. Papadopoulos E. E. Papalexakis L. Papalini G. Papigkiotis A. Paquis A. Parisi B. -J. Park J. Park W. Parker G. Pascale D. Pascucci A. Pasqualetti R. Passaquieti L. Passenger D. Passuello O. Patane A. V. Patel D. Pathak A. Patra B. Patricelli B. G. Patterson K. Paul S. Paul E. Payne T. Pearce M. Pedraza A. Pele F. E. Peña Arellano X. Peng Y. Peng S. Penn M. D. Penuliar A. Perego Z. Pereira C. Périgois G. Perna A. Perreca J. Perret S. Perriès J. W. Perry S. Peters S. Petracca C. Petrillo H. P. Pfeiffer H. Pham K. A. Pham K. S. Phukon H. Phurailatpam M. Piarulli L. Piccari O. J. Piccinni M. Pichot A. Pied M. Piendibene F. Piergiovanni L. Pierini G. Pierra V. Pierro M. Pietrzak M. Pillas L. Pinard I. M. Pinto M. Pinto B. J. Piotrzkowski M. Pirello M. D. Pitkin A. Placidi E. Placidi M. L. Planas W. Plastino C. Plunkett R. Poggiani E. Polini J. Pomper L. Pompili J. Poon E. Porcelli A. S. Porter E. K. Porter C. Posnansky R. Poulton J. Powell G. S. Prabhu M. Pracchia B. K. Pradhan T. Pradier A. K. Prajapati K. Prasai R. Prasanna P. Prasia G. Pratten A. Praveen G. Principe G. A. Prodi P. Prosperi P. Prosposito A. Puecher J. Pullin P. Puppo M. Pürrer H. Qi M. Qiao J. Qin G. Quéméner V. Quetschke P. J. Quinonez R. Rading I. Rainho S. Raja C. Rajan B. Rajbhandari K. E. Ramirez F. A. Ramis Vidal M. Ramos Arevalo A. Ramos-Buades S. Ranjan M. Ranjbar K. Ransom P. Rapagnani B. Ratto A. Ravichandran A. Ray V. Raymond M. Razzano J. Read J. Regan T. Regimbau T. Reichardt S. Reid C. Reissel D. H. Reitze A. I. Renzini B. Revenu A. Revilla Peña L. Ricca F. Ricci M. Ricci A. Ricciardone J. Rice J. W. Richardson M. L. Richardson A. Rijal K. Riles H. K. Riley S. Rinaldi J. Rittmeyer C. Robertson F. Robinet M. Robinson A. Rocchi L. Rolland J. G. Rollins A. E. Romano R. Romano A. Romero-Rodríguez I. M. Romero-Shaw J. H. Romie S. Ronchini T. J. Roocke L. Rosa T. J. Rosauer C. A. Rose D. Rosińska M. P. Ross M. Rossello-Sastre S. Rowan K. Rowlands S. K. Roy S. Roy D. Rozza P. Ruggi N. Ruhama G. H. Ruiz E. Ruiz Morales K. Ruiz-Rocha V. Russ S. Sachdev T. Sadecki P. Saffarieh S. Safi-Harb M. R. Sah S. Saha T. Sainrat S. Sajith Menon K. Sakai Y. Sakai M. Sakellariadou S. Sakon O. S. Salafia F. Salces-Carcoba L. Salconi M. Saleem F. Salemi M. Sallé S. U. Salunkhe S. Salvador A. Salvarese A. Samajdar A. Sanchez E. J. Sanchez N. Sanchis-Gual J. R. Sanders E. M. Sänger F. Santoliquido F. Sarandrea T. R. Saravanan N. Sarin P. Sarkar A. Sasli P. Sassi B. Sassolas B. S. Sathyaprakash R. Sato S. Sato Yukino Sato Yu Sato O. Sauter R. L. Savage T. Sawada H. L. Sawant S. Sayah V. Scacco D. Schaetzl M. Scheel A. Schiebelbein M. G. Schiworski P. Schmidt S. Schmidt R. Schnabel M. Schneewind R. M. S. Schofield K. Schouteden B. W. Schulte M. Schulz B. F. Schutz E. Schwartz M. Scialpi J. Scott S. M. Scott R. M. Sedas T. C. Seetharamu M. Seglar-Arroyo Y. Sekiguchi D. Sellers N. Sembo A. S. Sengupta E. G. Seo J. W. Seo V. Sequino M. Serra A. Sevrin T. Shaffer U. S. Shah M. A. Shaikh L. Shao J. Sharkey A. K. Sharma Preeti Sharma Priyanka Sharma Ritwik Sharma Sushant Sharma-Chaudhary P. Shawhan N. S. Shcheblanov E. Sheridan Z. -H. Shi R. Shimomura H. Shinkai S. Shirke D. H. Shoemaker D. M. Shoemaker R. W. Short S. ShyamSundar A. Sider H. Siegel V. Sierra D. Sigg L. Silenzi L. Silvestri M. Simmonds L. P. Singer Amitesh Singh Anika Singh D. Singh M. K. Singh N. Singh S. Singh M. R. Sinha A. M. Sintes V. Sipala V. Skliris B. J. J. Slagmolen T. J. Slaven-Blair J. Smetana D. A. Smith J. R. Smith L. Smith R. J. E. Smith W. J. Smith S. Soares de Albuquerque Filho K. Somiya I. Song S. Soni V. Sordini F. Sorrentino H. Sotani F. Spada V. Spagnuolo A. P. Spencer P. Spinicelli A. K. Srivastava F. Stachurski C. J. Stark D. A. Steer N. Steinle J. Steinlechner S. Steinlechner N. Stergioulas P. Stevens M. StPierre M. D. Strong A. Strunk A. L. Stuver M. Suchenek S. Sudhagar Y. Sudo N. Sueltmann L. Suleiman K. D. Sullivan J. Sun L. Sun S. Sunil J. Suresh B. J. Sutton P. J. Sutton K. Suzuki M. Suzuki A. Svizzeretto S. Swain B. L. Swinkels A. Syx M. J. Szczepańczyk P. Szewczyk M. Tacca M. Tagliazucchi H. Tagoshi S. C. Tait K. Takada H. Takahashi R. Takahashi A. Takamori S. Takano H. Takeda K. Takeshita I. Takimoto Schmiegelow M. Takou-Ayaoh C. Talbot M. Tamaki N. Tamanini D. Tanabe K. Tanaka S. J. Tanaka S. Tanioka D. B. Tanner W. Tanner L. Tao R. D. Tapia E. N. Tapia San Martín C. Taranto A. Taruya J. D. Tasson J. G. Tau A. Tejera R. Tenorio H. Themann A. Theodoropoulos M. P. Thirugnanasambandam L. M. Thomas M. Thomas P. Thomas J. E. Thompson S. R. Thondapu K. A. Thorne E. Thrane J. Tissino A. Tiwari Pawan Tiwari Praveer Tiwari S. Tiwari V. Tiwari E. M. Todd M. R. Todd E. Tofani M. Toffano A. M. Toivonen K. Toland A. E. Tolley T. Tomaru V. Tommasini T. Tomura H. Tong C. Tong-Yu A. Torres-Forné C. I. Torrie I. Tosta e Melo E. Tournefier M. Trad Nery A. Trapananti R. Travaglini F. Travasso G. Traylor M. Trevor M. C. Tringali A. Tripathee G. Troian A. Trovato L. Trozzo R. J. Trudeau T. Tsang S. Tsuchida K. Tsuji L. Tsukada K. Turbang M. Turconi C. Turski H. Ubach A. S. Ubhi N. Uchikata T. Uchiyama R. P. Udall T. Uehara K. Ueno V. Undheim L. E. Uronen T. Ushiba M. Vacatello H. Vahlbruch G. Vajente J. Valencia M. Valentini E. Vallejo-Pagès S. A. Vallejo-Peña S. Vallero M. van Dael E. Van den Bossche J. F. J. van den Brand C. Van Den Broeck M. van der Kolk M. van der Sluys A. Van de Walle J. van Dongen K. Vandra M. VanDyke H. van Haevermaet J. V. van Heijningen P. Van Hove J. Vanier J. Vanosky N. van Remortel M. Vardaro A. F. Vargas V. Varma A. Vecchio G. Vedovato J. Veitch P. J. Veitch S. Venikoudis J. Venneberg R. C. Venterea P. Verdier M. Vereecken D. Verkindt B. Verma Y. Verma S. M. Vermeulen F. Vetrano A. Veutro A. Viceré S. Vidyant A. D. Viets A. Vijaykumar A. Vilkha N. Villanueva Espinosa V. Villa-Ortega E. T. Vincent J. -Y. Vinet S. Viret S. Vitale A. Vives L. Vizmeg H. Vocca D. Voigt E. R. G. von Reis J. S. A. von Wrangel W. E. Vossius L. Vujeva S. P. Vyatchanin J. Wack L. E. Wade M. Wade K. J. Wagner L. Wallace E. J. Wang H. Wang W. H. Wang Y. F. Wang Z. Wang G. Waratkar R. L. Ward J. Warner M. Was T. Washimi N. Y. Washington B. Weaver S. A. Webster N. L. Weickhardt M. Weinert A. J. Weinstein R. Weiss L. Wen K. Wette C. Wheeler J. T. Whelan B. F. Whiting C. Whittall E. G. Wickens D. Wilken B. M. Williams D. Williams M. J. Williams N. S. Williams J. L. Willis B. Willke M. Wils L. Wilson C. W. Winborn J. Winterflood C. C. Wipf G. Woan J. Woehler N. E. Wolfe H. T. Wong I. C. F. Wong K. Wong T. Wouters J. L. Wright M. Wright B. Wu C. Wu D. S. Wu H. Wu K. Wu Q. Wu Z. Wu E. Wuchner D. M. Wysocki V. A. Xu Y. Xu N. Yadav H. Yamamoto K. Yamamoto T. S. Yamamoto T. Yamamoto R. Yamazaki T. Yan H. Yang K. Z. Yang Y. Yang Z. Yarbrough J. Yebana S. -W. Yeh A. B. Yelikar X. Yin J. Yokoyama T. Yokozawa S. Yuan H. Yuzurihara M. Zanolin M. Zeeshan T. Zelenova J. -P. Zendri M. Zeoli M. Zerrad M. Zevin H. Zhang L. Zhang N. Zhang R. Zhang T. Zhang C. Zhao Yue Zhao Yuhang Zhao Z. -C. Zhao Y. Zheng H. Zhong H. Zhou H. O. Zhu Z. -H. Zhu Z. Zhu A. B. Zimmerman L. Zimmermann M. E. Zucker 10.1103/gzrj-mwv3 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11600v1 2026-05-12T06:27:33Z

Galaxy rotation curves provide a direct test of how baryonic matter and dark matter combine to determine the mass profiles of disk galaxies. In ultralight or fuzzy dark matter models, numerical simulations predict a central solitonic core surrounded by an outer halo, but the population-level relation between the core and the host halo remains an important modelling choice. We present a hierarchical Bayesian pipeline for fitting soliton-plus-NFW rotation-curve models to the SPARC database while treating the core-halo scaling exponent as a global free parameter. The model uses a Schive-normalized soliton, a regularized NFW envelope with a smooth transition, halo-mass priors tied to $V_{\rm flat}$, and stellar-to-halo-mass information. We apply the pipeline to 106 SPARC galaxies, including 26 systems with bulges, and sample the resulting 346-dimensional posterior with JAX/NumPyro NUTS. The free-scaling run has zero divergences and $\hat r \simeq 1.000$ for the global parameters. The posterior reaches the upper edge of the standard mass prior and the lower edge of the scaling prior, with $\log_{10}(m_φ/{\rm eV})=-19.20^{+0.12}_{-0.11}$ and $α=0.014^{+0.023}_{-0.011}$. This boundary behaviour persists after removing UGC06787 and after widening the high-mass stellar-to-halo-mass prior. Within the adopted Schive-normalized model and standard SPARC fuzzy-dark-matter prior range, the selected SPARC sample does not identify an interior population-level soliton component. The main contribution is the hierarchical inference framework and the diagnostic workflow for recognizing boundary solutions in full-sample rotation-curve analyses.

2026-05-12T06:27:33Z 19 pages, 6 figures, 2 tables; includes appendices with prior specifications, fixed-$α$ traces, widened-prior diagnostic, and code/data availability Prasun Panthi Md Shahrier Islam Arham http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11486v1 2026-05-12T04:03:32Z

High spatial resolution observations reveal that some protoplanetary disks host multiple ring-gap pairs at large stellocentric radii, yet their physical origin remains unsettled. We present a multi-wavelength analysis of the V1094 Sco disk using Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array Band 6 continuum and $^{12}$CO and $^{13}$CO $J=2-1$ emission, together with a Very Large Telescope/SPHERE near-infrared scattered light image. The continuum image shows four narrow dust ring-gap pairs extending to exceptionally large radii ($r \sim 380$ au), while the CO isotopologues trace a spatially extended gas disk ($r \sim 760$ au) in Keplerian rotation. From the dust ring widths, we place conservative upper limits on the turbulent viscosity parameter, $α\lesssim 10^{-3}$ and potentially $\lesssim 10^{-4}$, implying weak turbulence. The ensemble of gap widths and depths is inconsistent with a simple one-planet-per-gap interpretation. At $r \simeq 100$ au, a double gap and its scattered light counterpart are consistent with multi-gap excitation by a single low-mass companion of $(55 \pm 35)\,M_{\oplus}$. At $r \simeq 170-230$ au, the outer ring system shows regular spacing and no clear scattered light counterpart, indicating mechanisms that operate primarily at the disk midplane. These outer rings are quantitatively compatible with secular gravitational instability. V1094 Sco therefore supports a hybrid pathway in which weak turbulence in an extended disk allows secular gravitational instability to assemble long-lived midplane dust concentrations that can cradle planet formation beyond $\sim 100$ au, alongside planet-driven substructures at intermediate radii.

2026-05-12T04:03:32Z 35 pages, 19 figures, 7 tables. Submitted to AAS Journals Masayuki Yamaguchi Masahiro N. Machida Ryosuke T. Tominaga Jinshi Sai Takayuki Muto Michihiro Takami Hauyu Baobab Liu Ayumu Shoshi Takashi Tsukagoshi Shu Ishibashi http://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11098v2 2026-05-12T01:46:53Z

The quantum expectation value and the stationary noise spectral density for a Fabry-P'erot gravitational-wave detector with a DC readout scheme are discussed in detail only through the quantum electrodynamics of lasers and the Heisenberg equations of mirrors' motion. We demonstrate that the initial conditions of the mirrors' motion concentrate around the fundamental frequency of the pendulum and are not related to the frequency range of our interest. Although, in the ideal case, there is consensus that the shot-noise contribution from the laser to the high-frequency range of the signal-referred noise spectral density decreases as the injected laser power increases, our derived noise spectral density shows that the shot-noise contribution does not decrease. This is due to leakage of classical radiation pressure forces from the carrier field to the output port, and the carrier field is used as the reference in the DC readout scheme. Since classical radiation pressure acts as a constant force, it shifts the pendulum's equilibrium point of the mirrors' motion. To recover the ideal case, we must consider adjusting the interferometer's tuning point to place the mirrors at their equilibrium positions. We investigate the case where the equilibrium tuning is incomplete and show that the behavior of the above shot noise is due to this incompleteness. We also discuss the maximum deviation of the mirror displacements from the equilibrium point during incomplete tuning to recover a near-ideal case.

2025-08-14T22:24:56Z 51 pages, 11 figures (v1); 53 pages 11 figures To be appeared in Physical Review D Physical Review D vol.113 (2026), 125006 Kouji Nakamura 10.1103/m4mr-8bp3 http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11329v1 2026-05-11T23:28:18Z

We present the optical design of OPTICAM-ARG, a multi-channel instrument for the simultaneous acquisition of images in three spectral bands at the Cassegrain focus of an f/8.5 telescope, covering the 0.35 to 1.00 um wavelength range. The converging beam delivered by the telescope is spectrally separated by two dichroics into three channels, blue, green, and red, each incorporating a dedicated three-lens focal reducer, an interchangeable SDSS filter stage, and an sCMOS detector. The focal reducers establish an effective focal length of approximately 9.1 m, a uniform plate scale of 22.6 arcsec/mm, and a field of view of 8.4 arcmin x 8.4 arcmin per channel, consistent with the typical seeing conditions at the site. Operation of the dichroics in a converging beam introduces off-axis aberrations, which are mitigated through wedge angles applied to their second surface and optimized as part of the global design. Optical performance is assessed through exact ray tracing using RMS spot radii and encircled energy metrics, with EE50 values further expressed in terms of an equivalent FWHM to enable direct comparison with atmospheric seeing and to evaluate sensitivity to manufacturing tolerances.

2026-05-11T23:28:18Z Accepted for publication in Revista Mexicana de Astronomía y Astrofísica (RMxAA), Vol. 62-2 (2026). 14 pages, 6 figures Revista Mexicana de Astronomía y Astrofísica, Vol. 62-2, 2026 M. R. Najera J. Herrera Vazquez E. Luna A. Castro D. Altamirano R. Michel S. A. Cellone E. Sohn http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11269v1 2026-05-11T21:47:22Z

Modern gravitational wave astronomy relies on modeling tasks that often require months of graduate-level effort, including building fast waveform surrogates from expensive numerical relativity simulations, modeling orbital dynamics of black holes, fitting merger remnant properties and constructing template banks. These problems demand extreme precision to support detection and parameter inference, with state-of-the-art models achieving $\lesssim 10^{-4}$ relative error. We study whether state-of-the-art LLM coding agents can perform such end-to-end scientific modeling, where success requires constructing models with stringent accuracy criteria and reasoning about physical systems. We introduce gwBenchmarks, a suite of eight tasks grounded in gravitational wave analytic calculations and numerical simulations collectively representing over $10^8$ core-hours of compute. The tasks span interpolation, regression, and high-dimensional time-series modeling, requiring a combination of numerical methods, machine learning, and physics-informed approaches. In preliminary experiments, agents frequently relied on proxy metrics, partial evaluation, or fabricated results to spuriously complete tasks. We therefore implement an external pre-defined framework to gauge agent progress. Evaluating twelve coding agents, we find no consistent winner. On the easiest task, multiple agents converge to the same cubic spline solution, with one rediscovering a coordinate transformation widely used in the literature. On harder tasks like analytic waveform modeling, all agents fall 1-2 orders of magnitude short of domain requirements and exhibit systematic failures, including metric misuse, constraint violations, and result fabrication. Our code, data, and website are publicly available.

2026-05-11T21:47:22Z 26 pages, 4 figures Tousif Islam Digvijay Wadekar Zihan Zhou http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11176v1 2026-05-11T19:38:35Z

We present a neural-network-based data processing pipeline for Baikal-GVD, designed to improve event reconstruction quality and accelerate neutrino candidates selection. The pipeline comprises three stages: fast suppression of extensive air shower events, suppression of noise optical modules activations, and extraction of high confidence neutrino candidates. All three networks employ a transformer architecture that exploits inter-hit correlations through the attention mechanism. Applied sequentially, the pipeline achieves orders-of-magnitude speedup over the standard reconstruction chain. Moreover, noise suppression neural network surpasses the accuracy of algorithmic noise suppression algorithms and provides estimate for time residuals of the signal hits, which is crucial for identification of track-like hits. We address the domain shift between Monte Carlo simulations and experimental data by incorporating a domain adaptation technique, demonstrating improved agreement between the two domains. The resulting framework enables near-real-time event classification, with direct applications to multi-messenger alert systems and diffuse neutrino flux measurements.

2026-05-11T19:38:35Z A. Matseiko Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology G. Plotnikov Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences I. Kharuk Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.11099v1 2026-05-11T18:04:43Z

We present the Survey Footprint Explorer (v2.5.0), a browser-based interactive tool for visualising and comparing the sky footprints of major astronomical imaging surveys. The tool is implemented entirely in client-side JavaScript and requires no server infrastructure, making it immediately accessible from any modern web browser. Thirteen survey footprints are currently included: Euclid DR1, LSST Wide-Fast-Deep, the Nancy Grace Roman HLWAS and HLTDS (full and deep tiers), DESI Legacy Imaging Survey DR9, the Dark Energy Survey (DES), the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam survey (HSC), the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS), the Ultraviolet Near-Infrared Optical Northern Survey (UNIONS), the eROSITA All-Sky Survey (eRASS1), and the Atacama Cosmology Telescope Legacy (ACT) survey spanning wavelengths from X-ray to near-infrared and covering footprints from 7.7 deg$^{2}$ to 21,524.4 deg$^{2}$. Survey footprints are encoded as Multi-Order Coverage (MOC) maps and rendered via two complementary views: an interactive globe powered by Aladin Lite v2, and a full-sky equirectangular projection. All MOC intersection calculations, including multi-survey overlap area computation and per-source membership testing, are performed client-side. Users may upload source catalogues in CSV or TSV format and download an augmented version with boolean survey membership columns appended. The link to access the tool is provided at the end of the Summary section.

2026-05-11T18:04:43Z 9 pages, 4 figures, web app S. L. Ahad Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo CASSA, Independent University, Bangladesh R. Brilenkov Kapteyn Astronomical Institute Definity Insurance Company, Canada J. E. Taylor Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.10795v2 2026-05-11T17:33:28Z

Current pulsar timing array (PTA) analyses do not take full advantage of pulsar distance information, thereby missing out on improved angular resolution and on a potential factor-of-two gain in detection sensitivity for individual gravitational-wave (GW) sources. In this work, we investigate the impact of precise pulsar distance measurements on angular resolution as an extension to previous work measuring the angular resolution of a dense, isotropic PTA [Jow et al., 2025]. We present a coherent map-making technique that utilizes precise pulsar distance measurements to reach the diffraction-limited resolution of an individual source: $δθ_{\mathrm{diff}} \sim (1/\mathrm{SNR})(λ_{\mathrm{GW}}/r) \approx 2~\mathrm{arcmin}$, where the SNR refers to the detection strength of the source. With this level of angular resolution, identifying an EM counterpart may become feasible, enabling multi-messenger follow-up. We show that for $\rm SNR=10$, which may be the current sensitivity level using a coherent analysis, the diffraction limit is reached with roughly 9 pulsars. Moreover, angular resolution scales sharply with the number of known pulsar distances as $\sim (1/\mathrm{SNR})^{N_{\mathrm{dist}}/2}$. Thus, each additional pulsar with high signal-to-noise timing and precise distance measurement can improve PTA resolution by an order of magnitude. The distance to the best-timed millisecond pulsar (PSR J0437$-$4715) is already constrained to sub-parsec levels. We argue, therefore, that a coherent analysis of PTA data, fully incorporating pulsar distance information, is timely.

2025-12-11T16:41:44Z 8 pages, 2 figures Anna C. Tsai Dylan L. Jow Ue-Li Pen http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.20996v3 2026-05-11T16:32:51Z

When gravitational waves (GWs) propagate near massive objects, they undergo gravitational lensing that imprints lens model dependent modulations on the waveform. This effect provides a powerful tool for cosmological and astrophysical studies. Due to the added parameters of lenses and the uncertainty of lens models, parameter inference for lensed GW events using traditional methods is extremely time-consuming, thus requiring more efficient parameter inference methods. In this work, we explore the use of neural spline flows (NSFs) for posterior inference of millilensed GWs, and successfully apply NSFs to the inference of 11-dimensional lens parameters. Our results demonstrate that compared with traditional methods like Bilby dynesty that rely on Bayesian inference, the NSF network we built not only achieves inference accuracy comparable to traditional methods for most parameters, but also can reduce the inference time from approximately 3 days to 0.8 s on average. Additionally, the network exhibits strong generalization for the spin parameters of GW sources. It is anticipated to become a powerful tool for future low-latency searches for lensed GW signals.

2025-05-27T10:31:21Z 12 pages, 6 figures Phys. Rev. D 113, 104023 (2026) Zheng Qin Tian-Yang Sun Bo-Yuan Li Jing-Fei Zhang Xiao Guo Xin Zhang 10.1103/rr64-d3zd http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10719v1 2026-05-11T15:28:59Z

Simulation-based inference (SBI) enables parameter inference by training neural networks on forward simulations. It is being applied both for intractable likelihoods as well as under time constraints on the posterior sampling. After motivating situations in which SBI is useful, we give a pedagogical description of the basic techniques. These are posterior, likelihood, and ratio estimation. Alternatives, sequential versions, and learned summaries are discussed briefly. We provide a brief guide to choosing among the techniques in practical scenarios. SBI needs to be verified through diagnostics since failures can be subtle but would invalidate the inference result. We explain the most common diagnostic techniques. We briefly list some recent SBI applications in the cosmology and astrophysics literature. Before concluding, we discuss current methodological challenges. We identify training with limited simulation budgets as the critical problem for applications to cosmology and astrophysics.

2026-05-11T15:28:59Z 14 pages, 7 figures. Invited chapter for the edited book "Machine Learning Techniques for Astrophysics and Cosmology" (Eds. Cosimo Bambi, Vinay Kashyap, Swarnim Shashank, Naoki Yoshida, Springer Singapore, expected in 2026). Submitted version Leander Thiele http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10649v1 2026-05-11T14:34:55Z

Context. Solar wavefront sensing has been a challenge for astrophysical instrumentalists, due to the low contrast between the Sun and the sky background compared to night-time observations, which limits the performance of adaptive optics systems. Aims. Wavefront correction in solar physics requires the analysis of extended images; meanwhile, at night the displacement of a punctual object is analysed. This technique limits the spatial resolution, and therefore the accuracy in the wavefront reconstruction. Methods. To solve this problem, a new method of direct wavefront sensing without the need for image formation was explored for this work. A novel and promising technology called integrated photonics was used to accomplish this task. It allows the direct measurement of phase differences across the wavefront without the need to form images, using the principle of interferometry. This technology offers a low-consumption, miniaturised solution to astrophysical problems. Results. For this work a mathematical model was derived to characterise the behaviour of the proposed wavefront sensor. The proposed system was verified and simulated using a Python-based adaptive optics simulator. These simulations demonstrate the physical behaviour of the proposed wavefront sensor and highlight the factors that must be taken into account for its correct functioning.

2026-05-11T14:34:55Z Accepted for publication in Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A) on 2026-04-20 Diego Portero-Rodríguez Hugo García-Vázquez José Javier Díaz García Luis Fernando Rodríguez Ramos Félix Gracia Témich J. Alfonso L. Aguerri http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.10584v1 2026-05-11T13:58:32Z

With the detection of gravitational waves (GWs), multi-messenger astronomy has opened a new window for advancing our understanding of astrophysics, dense matter, gravitation, and cosmology. The GW sources detected to date are from mergers of compact object binaries, which possess the potential to generate detectable electromagnetic (EM) counterparts. Searching for associations between GW signals and their EM counterparts is an essential step toward enabling subsequent multi-messenger studies. In the era of next-generation GW and EM detectors, the rapid increase in the number of events brings not only unprecedented scientific opportunities, but also substantial challenges to the existing data analysis paradigm. To help address these challenges, we develop GW-Eyes, an agentic framework powered by large language models (LLMs). For the first time, GW-Eyes integrates domain-specific tools and autonomously performs counterpart association tasks between GW and candidate EM events. It supports natural language interaction to assist human experts with auxiliary tasks such as catalog management, skymap visualization, and rapid verification. Our framework leverages the complex decision-making capabilities of LLMs and their traceable reasoning processes, offering a new perspective to the multi-messenger astronomy.

2026-05-11T13:58:32Z Yiming Dong Yacheng Kang Junjie Zhao Xinyuan Zhu Ziming Wang Lijing Shao http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09832v3 2026-05-11T13:54:43Z

Reverberation mapping is a technique in which the mass of a Seyfert I galaxy's central supermassive black hole is estimated, along with the system's physical scale, from the timescale at which variations in brightness propagate through the galactic nucleus. This mapping allows for a long baseline of time measurements to extract spatial information beyond the angular resolution of our telescopes, and is the main means of constraining supermassive black hole masses at high redshift. The most recent generation of multi-year reverberation mapping campaigns for large numbers of active galactic nuclei (e.g. OzDES) have had to deal with persistent complications of identifying false positives, such as those arising from aliasing due to seasonal gaps in time-series data. We introduce LITMUS (Lag Inference Through the Mixed Use of Samplers), a modern lag recovery tool built on the "damped random walk" model of quasar variability, built in the autodiff framework JAX. LITMUS is purpose built to handle the multimodal aliasing of seasonal observation windows and provides evidence integrals for model comparison, a more quantified alternative to existing methods of lag validation. LITMUS also offers a flexible modular framework for extending modelling of AGN variability, and includes JAX-enabled implementations of other popular lag recovery methods like nested sampling and the interpolated cross correlation function. We test LITMUS on a number of mock light curves modelled after the OzDES sample and find that it recovers their lags with high precision and a successfully identifies spurious lag recoveries, reducing its false positive rate to drastically outperform the state of the art program JAVELIN. LITMUS's high performance is accomplished by an algorithm for mapping the Bayesian posterior density which both constrains the lag and offers a Bayesian framework for model null hypothesis testing.

2025-05-14T22:23:08Z 17 Pages, 10 Figures pasa.2026.10149 Hugh G. McDougall Tamara M. Davis Benjamin J. S. Pope 10.1017/pasa.2026.10149