https://arxiv.org/api/I1jJXcIGQ90fjmOCN0novLU9cWY2026-06-10T09:46:21Z3590316515http://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09268v2The Illusory Precision of TTV Masses: Hidden Solutions Behind Kepler-9's Tight Mass Ratio2026-05-29T14:49:17ZTransit timing variations (TTV) are considered a tool for constraining the masses of transiting planets in the absence of radial-velocity data. Although theoretical studies have long revealed that TTV mass determinations intrinsically suffer from degeneracies, existing analyses of TTV data typically report a single-mode solution under a model with a specified number of planets. This is because fitting TTV curves in the high-dimensional solution space of TTV posterior is extremely challenging; even locating a single solution requires substantial computational resources. We developed an efficient mode-first searching algorithm that can locate multiple solutions in a single MCMC run. We applied this algorithm to Kepler-9 b and c, which have the highest-quality TTV data. We found that the observed TTV can be reproduced by many combinations of planetary masses spanning a broad range, rather than the previously assumed precise determination. The mass of Kepler-9 b can range from 31.6 to 47.1 $M_{\oplus}$, while that of Kepler-9 c can range from 21.8 to 32.3 $M_{\oplus}$, and even more broadly under looser constraints. These degenerate solutions follow a linear relationship under a tight mass ratio between the two planets, consistent with previous theoretical predictions. Furthermore, we demonstrate that achieving a globally converged posterior distribution for Kepler-9's TTV is impossible using a sampling algorithm that preserves the Markovian property. This underscores the need for caution when interpreting results from sampling algorithms that lack mathematical guarantees of global convergence.2026-04-10T12:35:14Zaccepted for publication in ApJSheng JinDong-Hong WuXiao-Ling XuJianghui Jihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00177v1Magnesium Silicate Clouds in the Atmosphere of HD 209458b from a Rule-Based Tree-Structured Data Reduction2026-05-29T14:00:29ZHD 209458b is the canonical hot Jupiter: the first to have its atmosphere measured and the first to hint at the role of aerosols in exoplanet atmospheres through the muting of Na absorption signatures in the optical. Here we present JWST MIRI/LRS transmission observations of HD 209458b from 5-12 microns, directly measuring the absorption signatures of its clouds for the first time. The observations indicate the presence of magnesium silicates, most likely Mg2SiO4 or a mixture of Mg2SiO4 and MgSiO3. We also present a new methodology to reduce observational data, whereby the analysis is formulated as a rule-based model with a tree structure, enabling key decisions to be identified and uncertain decisions to be incorporated into subsequent modeling. With this data reduction, and using a combination of ARCiS free retrievals and PICASO+Virga self consistent forward models, we are able to show that amorphous Mg2SiO4 clouds explain the LRS data to high significance over either a clear (Delta ln(Z)=16.63) or gray cloud atmosphere (Delta ln(Z)=22.26). By combining the LRS dataset with archival JWST NIRCam and HST optical and near-infrared observations, we are able to more robustly constrain the properties of the magnesium silicate condensates, finding particle sizes of approximately 0.1 microns and atmospheric pressures of the clouds of roughly 1-10 millibar. Our results add to the growing detections of silicate clouds as a dominant atmospheric component of hot Jupiters, with the exact silicate species contextualizing the atmospheric chemistry and potentially formation conditions of these planets.2026-05-29T14:00:29ZAccepted for publication in the Astronomical JournalKaty L. ChubbDavid GrantHannah R. WakefordSarah E. MoranNatasha E. BatalhaArika EganCharlotte FairmanDiana PowellKevin B. StevensonLili AldersonPeter GaoTiffany KatariaNikole K. LewisRyan J. MacDonaldMark Marley Elijah MullensDavid K. SingJeff A. Valentihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.17469v2Super-resolution wavefront reconstruction in adaptive-optics with pyramid sensors2026-05-29T13:39:08ZSuper-resolution (SR) refers to a combination of optical design and signal processing techniques jointly employed to obtain reconstructed wave-fronts at a higher-resolution from multiple low-resolution samples, overcoming the intrinsic limitations of the latter. After compelling examples have been provided on multi-Shack-Hartman (SH) wave-front sensor (WFS) adaptive optics systems performing atmospheric tomography with laser guide star probes, we broaden the SR concept to pyramid sensors (PyWFS) with a single sensor and a natural guide star. We revisit the analytic PyWFS diffraction model to claim two aspects: i) that we can reconstruct spatial frequencies beyond the natural Shannon-Nyquist frequency imposed by the detector pixel size and/or ii) that the PyWFS can be used to measure amplitude aberrations (at the origin of scintillation). SR offers the possibility to control a higher actuator density deformable mirror from seemingly fewer samples, the quantification of which is one of the goals of this paper. A super-resolved PyWFS is more resilient to mis-registration, lifts alignment requirements and improves performance (against aliasing and other spurious modes AO systems are poorly sensitive to) with only a factor up to 2 increased real-time computational burden.2025-12-19T11:33:30ZPaper has a major mathematical flaw that needs to be addressed (in the introduction). The results are still verified and stand good, but the underlying justification for why one can perform super-resolution with a pyramid is not accurate nor completeCarlos M. CorreiaCharlotte Z. BondJoão AveiroFrançois LerouxCédric Taïssir HeritierChristophe Vérinaudhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.31301v1An Automated Photometric Pipeline for the 80cm Xizang University Telescope2026-05-29T13:35:29ZProcessing astronomical data can take up a significant amount of researchers' time. The 80cm telescope at Xizang University is currently in its trial operation phase; however, it lacks a data processing program, which makes efficient handling of the data it generates an urgent concern. To address this issue, we have developed an automatic pipeline for processing photometric data and extracting light curves using Python 3. This pipeline has several advantages, including high speed, ease of use, and modularity. The differential photometric accuracy of this pipeline is comparable to that of data processing programs used by other similar telescopes. This development effectively overcomes the limitations of manually processing data, providing efficient and reliable support for future studies of variable stars. The pipeline has already been integrated into the telescope's operational system.2026-05-29T13:35:29ZAccepted by New AstronomyNew Astronomy, 127, 102586 (2026)Chao XuJie ZhengTian-Lu ChenLin-Qiao JiangHua BaoYing-Gang Li SuoNan-DaJiXing-Lan Feng10.1016/j.newast.2026.102586http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.26140v2The role of the Hubble Space Telescope in advancing our understanding of atmospheric escape in exoplanets2026-05-29T13:29:16ZAn important evolutionary pathway for planetary atmospheres is escape to space, which has been studied on Earth and Mars for several decades and more recently in exoplanets. A particularly important regime is the hydrodynamic escape, wherein atmospheric mass escapes the planet at high rates in a collisional fluid outflow. This process is used to partly explain the early evolution of rocky planets in and out of the Solar System, as well as key aspects of exoplanet demographics. Hydrodynamic escape is not occurring in the Solar System planets, so our only option for such observations is through exoplanets. The ultraviolet (UV) capabilities of the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) are fundamental to detect hydrodynamic escape and measure the resulting mass-loss rates for a range of planetary systems and to identify targets for surveys with the Habitable Worlds Observatory. We discuss here what kinds of observations and instrument modes are necessary to continue studying atmospheric escape in exoplanets for the next decade, as well as how to advance our understanding of planetary evolution and habitability.2026-05-22T14:30:31Z8 pages, 2 figures; this article is a response to the call for white papers by STScI on "Building a Roadmap for Hubble science into the 2030s."Leonardo A. Dos SantosArika EganKevin FranceEric GaidosAntonio García MuñozR. O. Parke LoydKeighley RockcliffeMercedes López-MoralesP. Christian SchneiderArif SolmazMichael ZhangVladimir S. AirapetianMunazza K. AlamLaura N. R. do AmaralTommi KoskinenSeth RedfieldJake D. Turnerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.00164v1Astronomical Advantages of a Boost Mission to Facilitate HST Science into the 2030s: Imaging the Circumgalactic Medium of Galaxies2026-05-29T11:48:44ZWe present the case for imaging ultraviolet line emission from highly ionized metals and HI Lya in the circumgalactic medium of galaxies, should the Hubble Space Telescope receive an orbital boost. Hubble can uniquely probe emission lines with ionization potentials between 13 and 200 electron-volts (Lya, CIV, OVI, NeVIII, etc). Spatial mapping of the diffuse material traced by these transitions is critical to constraining the physics of feedback and the energetic exchange between galaxies and their circumgalactic environments, as well as basic morphologies of the dominant mass component. Deep high-resolution mapping of these features will not be possible with any other observatory, existing or planned, until HWO is launched, which leaves HST as a critical observatory to test key science drivers for HWO. If HST receives an orbital boost, it can (a) provide the first statistical constraints on the spatial distribution of warm-hot CGM and (b) provide important avenues for science case development, as well as target/pointing selection, for HWO's upcoming spectroscopic facilities.2026-05-29T11:48:44ZWhite paper in response to the STScI call "Building a Roadmap for Hubble science into the 2030s". Three figures, five-ish pages (adopting STScI's own policy of 'references do not count against the page limits), and a whole lot of hope!Matthew J. HayesKate H. R. RubinMichelle A. BergKevin FranceSally OeyRamona AugustinJoseph N. BurchettCody A. CarrAlison L. CoilSophia R. FluryCameron HummelsVarsha P. KulkarniStephan R. McCandlissMatilde MingozziDylan NelsonZixuan PengMichael RutkowskiAlberto Saldana-LopezJason TumlinsonSarah TuttleFreeke van de VoortBart P. WakkerJessica K. Werkhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29644v2Enhanced All-Distance Equi-Zenith Angle Method for Cosmic-Ray Anisotropy Measurement2026-05-29T10:01:44ZLong-term observations indicate that the relative intensity of cosmic-ray anisotropy remains below $0.1\%$ for energies less than $\sim 1$ PeV. Measuring such faint signals poses a significant challenge in data analysis, requiring careful removal of instrumental and atmospheric artifacts. The all-distance equi-zenith angle method is widely employed to extract cosmic-ray anisotropies, as it effectively suppresses the instantaneous variations arising from the instrument and atmosphere. \textcolor{black}{However, instability in the detector efficiency makes precise measurements of anisotropy challenging with this method.} In this work, we present an enhanced all-distance equi-zenith angle method for cosmic-ray anisotropy measurement. Unlike previous implementations, our improved approach enables the simultaneous measurement of anisotropies over multiple time frames and allows the detection efficiency to be determined directly from the data. This feature makes the method especially suitable for applications where the detector array does not operate with long-term stability\textcolor{black}{, and thus allows for the measurement of anisotropy with high-precision}. Moreover, our enhanced method is also feasible when the data do not span complete tropical years.2026-05-28T09:11:50Z16 pages, 7 figuresDong-Xu SunDan LiWei LiuQiang YuanYi-Qing GuoHong-bo Huhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.09427v2Large or bright satellite constellations: Effects on observations, including on the background sky brightness2026-05-29T09:35:52ZThis study evaluates the effect of proposed constellations -- ranging from current deployments to mega-constellations and very bright reflector concepts -- on direct trail losses, diffuse background, and scattered sky brightness.
We use a numerical model for Mie and Rayleigh scattering in the V band, adapted from moonlight sky-brightness calculations and validated against observations of moonlight and stellar background light. This is combined with the SatConAnalytic package to quantify scattered light, diffuse light from undetected satellites, and direct losses from detected trails.
Constellations comprising approximately 60,000 satellites that adhere to the V_550km > 7 recommendation exert a negligible effect on sky brightness, contributing only about 10^-4 of the natural dark sky. Conversely, mega-constellations with 10^6 satellites render trails pervasive. Bright satellites, such those from AST SpaceMobile, significantly impact saturating detectors even when their number is moderate. Extremely bright satellites pose a far more severe threat: a 5000-satellite Reflect Orbital-like constellation elevates the scattered sky background by 20%-30%, and a population of 50,000 increases it by 200%-300%.
The constellations currently proposed for launch, over 1,700,000 objects and including satellites brighter than V_550km = 7, would substantially degrade observations. Maintaining satellite brightness below V_550km = 7 is important for all instruments, but critical for safeguarding saturating instruments, such as the VRO LSST camera and for limiting sky-background pollution. Even under this constraint, the total satellite population must remain below ~100,000 satellites to ensure that field-of-view losses do not exceed typical technical downtime.2026-04-10T15:42:43Z21 pages, 17 figures. Refereed by the International Astronomical Union (IAU) Centre for the Protection of the Dark and Quiet Sky (CPS, https://cps.iau.org)Olivier R. Hainauthttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28916v2First head-to-head comparison of agentic AI applied to the analysis of simulated data of the Einstein Telescope2026-05-29T07:07:56ZWe report a comparison of two state-of-the-art agentic AI systems, Claude Code (Anthropic) and Codex (OpenAI), tasked with autonomously executing a simple end-to-end gravitational wave data analysis pipeline on a shared computing infrastructure without human intervention. The pipeline comprises power spectral density estimation from raw Einstein Telescope simulated noise, geometric template bank generation, matched filter recovery of 100 binary black hole signal injections, automated results generation, and large language model-assisted production of a manuscript formatted in the style of Physical Review D. Both agents received identical written specifications and identical compute resources. The experiment was run twice: a first run with unrealistically loud injections, and a second run with signals rescaled to a physically motivated SNR range. The scientific results converged in both runs. However, the agents exhibited substantially different behaviors and computational costs: Claude Code completed the pipeline in ~3.4 minutes with silent deviations from the specification, while Codex required ~16 minutes across explicit self-correcting restarts, including an unsolicited performance optimization of the matched filter inner loop. The autonomously generated manuscripts also diverged in length, details, and quality. In the second run, a subtle difference in the interpretation of the SNR range instruction led to a genuine scientific divergence: Claude Code silently reinterpreted the instructions, while Codex followed the specification literally. We discuss the implications of these behavioral differences, such as speed versus auditability, silent versus transparent error handling, instruction interpretation, and the criticality of intermediate data representations in multi-model pipelines, for the deployment of agentic AI in scientific computing workflows.2026-05-27T17:54:26ZVersion 2; includes the report autonomoulsy written in PRD style by agentic AI systems as supplemental materialGianluca Ingugliahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30871v1Detection of CO, H$_2$O, and OH in WASP-18b with JWST/NIRISS using Direct-Extracted Spectra and Cross-Correlation2026-05-29T05:50:57ZThe James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has revolutionized the characterization of exoplanetary atmospheres, offering unprecedented sensitivity to probe their chemical and physical properties. Recently, a growing trend has emerged to obtain atmospheric information directly from pixel-level planetary spectra. In this work, we re-analyzed the WASP-18b NIRISS/SOSS dataset by employing a direct extraction method. This new method preserves the spectral information at the native instrumental resolution, thereby enabling the application of cross-correlation techniques and providing atmospheric retrievals with enhanced precision and richer information content. With this methodology, we report detections of CO at $4.4σ$ significance, H$_2$O at $3.4σ$, and OH at $7.8σ$, where CO and OH were previously unseen. Building on these unambiguous detections, our subsequent retrieval analysis significantly improves the constraints on atmospheric abundances. Our results demonstrate that the cross-correlation technique effectively extracts molecular signals from medium-resolution JWST data, enhancing detection sensitivity. By revisiting JWST archival data with cross-correlation and retrieval analysis, we can achieve a more comprehensive survey of planetary atmospheric chemistry, thereby placing precise constraints on key parameters such as planetary metallicity and C/O ratio.2026-05-29T05:50:57ZAccepted for publication in ApJQinglin OuyangFei YanShuo LiuBoyue GuoGuo ChenEnric PalléYuanheng YangWei WangMeng ZhaiQian Chenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30761v1Characterising and mitigating Bluetooth and WiFi radio frequency interference at the Parkes Observatory2026-05-29T02:46:54ZWe present a detailed characterisation of radio frequency interference (RFI) in the 2.4 GHz band around Murriyang, CSIRO's Parkes radio telescope. The dominant sources of interference are Wi-Fi and Bluetooth transmissions. We quantify how the intensity and directionality of this RFI vary with time of day and document its evolution over several years. Although most observers currently discard data within this band, our analysis shows that the interference is confined in both timeand frequency and can be effectively mitigated. Using 10 seconds of 16-bit voltage data recorded during observations of the Vela Pulsar (PSR J0835-4510), we demonstrate that the majority of the channelised data remain unaffected by RFI. We compare three RFI detection and mitigation algorithms and evaluate their relative performance. All methods perform effectively, and any could be implemented in real time to enable productive use of this observing band. A real time implementation would allow the scientific use of this 128 MHz observing band to increase, from almost 70% of the band being completely unusable all of the time, to over 90% of becoming accessible for science. Given its simplicity and efficiency, a basic power-threshold approach offers a relatively straightforward solution.2026-05-29T02:46:54ZTommy MarshmanGeorge HobbsJ. R. DawsonStefan OslowskiJohn TuthillSamantha GordonJohn E. ReynoldsAlex Dunninghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30626v1Advancing Heliophysics and Space Weather Modeling through Open Science2026-05-28T22:24:02ZWe present a community-wide effort to develop a strategy and action plan to advance heliophysics and space weather modeling through open science. While open science has the potential to enhance the quality and pace of scientific discovery, its application to scientific modeling requires more careful consideration regarding open data and open software guidelines, as scientific models differ significantly from data analysis software. We gathered feedback from modeling teams worldwide through a living survey and discussion sessions at the 2024 Open Science Workshop in College Park, USA, and at the 2025 COSPAR ISWAT Working Meeting in Cape Canaveral, USA. We complement these findings with lessons learned from almost 25 years of experience at the Community Coordinated Modeling Center in enabling open use of models. We identify key roadblocks in current open science practices and guidelines and offer recommendations for future progress across four overlapping themes: open use of models and simulation results, open validation, open development, and open collaboration. An essential outcome of the discussion is the need for model developers and model users to speak with a united voice and promote the role of models in future open science efforts. We introduce a new cross-domain community initiative called the Heliophysics Open Modeling Environment (HOME), which will be integrated as an overarching activity within COSPAR ISWAT. HOME will serve as a platform for modelers and model users to work together, facilitate community modeling, improve the scientific return on modeling investment, and advance understanding, modeling, and forecasting in heliophysics and space weather.2026-05-28T22:24:02ZAccepted for publication in Space WeatherC. CortiNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAUniversity of Hawaii at Manoa, Physics and Astronomy Department, USAUniversities Space Research Association, USAM. M. KuznetsovaNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAM. A. ReissNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAUniversities Space Research Association, USAJ. YueNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAThe Catholic University of America, USAJ. KarpenNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAC. N. ArgeNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAF. BacchiniKU Leuven, Centre for Mathematical Plasma Astrophysics, BelgiumC. BardNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAS. BruinsmaCNES, Space Geodesy Office, FranceR. M. CaplanPredictive Science Inc., USAL. K. S. DaldorffNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAThe Catholic University of America, USAP. J. DekaKU Leuven, Centre for Mathematical Plasma Astrophysics, BelgiumC. R. DeVoreNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAThe Catholic University of America, USAS. ElvidgeUniversity of Birmingham, School of Engineering, UKN. GanushkinaUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor, Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, USAJ. D. HubaSyntek Technologies, USAB. V. JacksonUniversity of California San Diego, Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, USAV. JordanovaLos Alamos National Laboratory, USAJ. A. LinkerPredictive Science Inc., USAH. LiuUniversity Corporation for Atmospheric Research, USAJ. G. LuhmannUniversity of California Berkeley, Space Sciences Laboratory, USAS. MarkidisKTH Royal Institute of Technology, SwedenP. MayankUniversity Corporation for Atmospheric Research, USAV. MerkinJohns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, USAN. MoensKU Leuven, Centre for Mathematical Plasma Astrophysics, BelgiumD. OdstrcilNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAGeorge Mason University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, USAY. A. OmelchenkoSpace Science Institute, USAM. PalmrothUniversity of Helsinki, Department of Physics, FinlandFinnish Meteorological Institute, pace and Earth Observation Centre, FFinlandS. PoedtsKU Leuven, Centre for Mathematical Plasma Astrophysics, BelgiumMaria Curie-Skłodowska University, PolandA. J. RidleyUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor, Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, USAY. ShouUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor, Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, USAV. TenishevNASA Marshall Space Flight Center, USAD. R. ThemensUniversity of Birmingham, School of Engineering, UKG. TothUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor, Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, USAW. WangUniversity Corporation for Atmospheric Research, USAR. -P. WilhelmKU Leuven, Centre for Mathematical Plasma Astrophysics, BelgiumM. A. YoungUniversity of New Hampshire, USAB. CecconiUniversité PSL, Observatoire de Paris, LIRA, FranceM. -Y. ChouNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAD. De ZeeuwNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAThe Catholic University of America, USAG. L. DelzannoLos Alamos National Laboratory, USAC. DidiguNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAM. El AlaouiNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAThe Catholic University of America, USAS. FungNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAJ. GreenSpace Hazards Applications, USAZ. HuangUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor, Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, USAUniversity of Science and Technology of China, School of Earth and Space Sciences, ChinaL. K. JianNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAL. J. LandwerUniversity of Colorado, CIRES, USANOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center, USAM. LeskoNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAP. MacNeiceNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAA. MassonEuropean Space Agency, European Space Astronomy Centre, SpainM. L. MaysNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAP. M. MehtaWest Virginia University, USAM. S. MieschUniversity of Colorado, CIRES, USAE. PalmerioPredictive Science Inc., USAM. PetrenkoNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAE. ProvornikovaJohns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, USAL. RastätterNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAL. RusaitisNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAThe Catholic University of America, USAN. SachdevaUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor, Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, USAE. SamaraNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAThe Catholic University of America, USAD. SurNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAThe Catholic University of America, USAA. TaktakishviliNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAThe Catholic University of America, USAJ. TopperNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAT. TsuiNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAC. VerbekeNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAUniversities Space Research Association, USAKU Leuven, Centre for Mathematical Plasma Astrophysics, BelgiumJ. WangNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAThe Catholic University of America, USAC. WiegandNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAM. WiltbergerUniversity Corporation for Atmospheric Research, USAY. ZhengNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAM. M. BisiRAL Space, United Kingdom Research and Innovation, Science & Technology Facilities Council, UKM. K. GeorgoulisJohns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, USARCAAM of the Academy of Athens, GreeceT. KodikaraGerman Aerospace Center, Institute for Solar-Terrestrial Physics, GermanyT. PulkkinenUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor, Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, USAA. ChartierJohns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, USAD. da SilvaNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAA. FaturahmanNational Research and Innovation Agency, Research Center for Space, IndonesiaK. Garcia-SageNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAD. KondrashovUniversity of California Los Angeles, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, USAV. E. LedvinaUniversity of Alaska Fairbanks, Geophysical Institute, USAW. LiuUniversity of Michigan Ann Arbor, Department of Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering, USAC. PandeyTexas Christian University, USAE. ResnickNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Heliophysics Science Division, USAASRC Federal, USAC. ShiAuburn University, Department of Physics, USAR. S. WeigelGeorge Mason University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, USAK. WhitmanKBR, USANASA Johnson Space Flight Center, USAI. ZakharenkovaUniversity Corporation for Atmospheric Research, USAK. ZhangUniversity of California Los Angeles, Department of Earth, Planetary, and Space Sciences, USAEmbry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Department of Physical Sciences, USA. Mostafa El Alaoui sadly passed away during the preparation of this paper, Shing Fung retired from NASA in May 2026http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30565v1Gratis Mitigation of Polarization Aberration Effects in Coronagraphic Dark Holes2026-05-28T20:53:58ZDirect imaging of exoplanets requires stellar coronagraphs capable of suppressing starlight to contrast levels below $10^{-8}$. Active wavefront control with deformable mirrors (DMs) is essential to create dark holes in the image plane. However, polarization aberrations arising from beam reduction optics and the coronagraph itself produces multiple non-interfering intensity components that have correlated responses to the DM. This article introduces the concept of gratis mitigation: when a control loop minimizes one intensity component, others can be reduced concomitantly due to the correlated DM responses. Using end-to-end physical optics simulations of a Lyot coronagraph fed by a 4 m-class telescope with $f/5$ beam reduction, we demonstrate gratis mitigation and analyze its origin via a Jones matrix formalism. Gratis mitigation has significant implications for coronagraph design, calibration, and possibly wavefront control.2026-05-28T20:53:58ZarXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2508.00237Richard A. Frazinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30500v1Transformer-Based Source Detection and Morphological Classification in LOFAR Deep-Field Continuum Images2026-05-28T19:34:57ZRadio source detection and morphological classification are fundamental for exploiting the scientific potential of modern radio continuum surveys. However, the rapidly increasing data volumes and the wide diversity of radio morphologies make traditional visual inspection infeasible and pose significant challenges for automated source finding. We apply a transformer-based set-prediction detector (RF-DETR) to 150\,MHz continuum images from the LOFAR Deep Fields for instance-level source detection and morphological classification. The method is adapted to multi-frequency-synthesis images of interferometric data and trained with a morphology-driven scheme using five mutually exclusive classes. The model is trained on the ELAIS-N1 Deep Field, where it achieves high detection and classification performance ($\mathrm{F1}\simeq 91$ per cent), and is then applied without retraining to the other three LOFAR Deep Fields. Across all four fields, the model yields consistent catalogues with modest field-to-field differences arising from survey depth and calibration. Compared with widely used PyBDSF catalogues, RF-DETR recovers the majority of PyBDSF sources while representing classical multi-component radio galaxies as single source-level detections rather than fragmented Gaussian components. Artefact-affected and spurious detections are identified as explicit classes, allowing these detections to be distinguished from general astrophysical sources in the resulting catalogues. As external validation, RF-DETR recovers the majority of visually identified extended and giant radio galaxies in the LOFAR Deep Fields and assigns them predominantly to extended morphological classes. These results indicate that transformer-based detectors provide a practical, scalable, morphology-aware approach to source finding in deep radio surveys, with clear relevance for forthcoming facilities such as SKA-Low.2026-05-28T19:34:57Z17 pages, 10 figures, 6 tables, accepted for publication in MNRASGuangwen ChenKristian Z. AdamiJohn AbelaCaijuan YueWeibin SunFujia LiZhaoting ChenDaniel MagroYogesh WadadekarLeah K. Morabitohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.30420v1Parameter resolution of near-Earth asteroids using LISA2026-05-28T18:00:03ZThe detection of near-Earth asteroids (NEAs) is critical for planetary defense and for advancing our understanding of the small-body population in the Solar System. Traditional detection techniques, including optical and radar, are the cornerstone of NEA discoveries. However, these are limited by observational constraints. We investigate whether the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), a future space-borne gravitational wave detector, might detect and constrain the parameters of NEAs through their gravitational effect on the spacecraft test masses during a close approach at the minimum orbital intersection distance. We modeled the gravitational perturbations of the test masses on the LISA spacecraft exerted by a passing NEA. Based on this, we computed its signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) to determine detectability using the LISA requirements. Furthermore, we used the Fisher information formalism to estimate the uncertainties on the state vector and mass of the asteroid given it is detected. These estimates provide a first-order assessment of the LISA capability to resolve NEA parameters under favorable encounter geometries. The Fisher information study showed that the fractional uncertainty on the asteroid mass scales as the inverse of the S/N. Consequently, a detection with an S/N $\geq 5$ yields a mass determination with an uncertainty of $\sim20\%$ at most. In contrast, the state vectors exhibit considerably larger uncertainties as they depend significantly on the geometry of the close approach. Nevertheless, for very high S/N cases, this precision may be comparable to the uncertainties obtained by some of the current observational methods. The analysis of the correlation matrices confirms that each close encounter produces a specific signal and provides a practical means to assign independent error bars to the recovered state vector.2026-05-28T18:00:03ZA&A Volume 710, Article A5 (June 2026)Sara MarquesOliver Jennrich10.1051/0004-6361/202658864