https://arxiv.org/api/Wr8GwovBN7qCtITYJ2BXjritrfk2026-06-21T09:09:21Z694184515http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.05842v2The X-ray emission of the long-period transient and accreting cataclysmic variable ASKAP J174508.9-5051492026-06-17T12:56:23ZLong-period transients (LPTs) challenge our knowledge of the mechanism producing radio periodic pulsations in compact objects. Some LPTs have been associated with systems hosting a white dwarf and a low-mass star in a detached binary. Recently, a new LPT (ASKAP\,J174508.9-505149) has been classified as an accreting cataclysmic variable (CV). In the present letter, we report on the detailed study of the X-ray variability of ASKAP\,J174508.9-505149 as observed by \emph{XMM-Newton} and \emph{Einstein Probe} between September 2025 and May 2026. Simultaneous optical and radio observations are also presented. We studied the timing variability of the source, and estimated an X-ray periodicity of $P=4868(22)$\,s, consistent with radio and optical periods. We also observe the same periodicity in the hardness ratio extracted from the \emph{XMM-Newton} observation, peaking at the minimum of the modulation. A long-term modulation is also present in the X-rays and in the B-band photometry, but it is poorly constrained by the current dataset. Spectral X-ray analysis shows the presence of a black-body component ($\sim$0.1\,keV), a collisionally ionised plasma ($\sim$15\,keV), and an absorption feature at 0.77 keV (possibly due to Oxygen-VII). This is the third LPT detected in the X-ray band, the second with a detected X-ray periodicity and variable X-ray emission, and the first conclusively recognised as an accreting magnetic CV.2026-06-04T08:17:57ZAccepted for publication in A&A Letters on 27/05/2026. 7 pages (4 main text+ 3 appendices)A&A, 710, L27 (2026)M. ImbrognoM. VeresvarskaY. L. WangN. ReaF. Coti ZelatiK. RoseJ. PritchardD. de MartinoS. ScaringiZ. WangD. L. Kaplan10.1051/0004-6361/202660831http://arxiv.org/abs/2606.10017v2Refined anti-proton and anti-deuteron fluxes from weak-scale Dark Matter2026-06-17T12:55:46ZWe provide the cosmic-ray (CR) fluxes of antiprotons and antideuterons produced by the Galactic annihilation or decay of weak-scale dark matter (DM) particles of masses in the range from a few GeV to 100 TeV. We estimate these fluxes based on the updated models for the propagation of charged particles in the Galaxy and using the improved $\bar{p}$ and $\bar{d}$ spectra provided by $\texttt{CosmiXs}$. For the updated propagation models we consider the MIN/MED/MAX sets under the new SLIM/BIG/QUAINT schemes. We treat the Galactic propagation in a semi-analytic way including different possible effects such as spatial diffusion, energy-losses, convection and diffusive reacceleration. For the DM distribution in the Galactic halo we consider NFW, Einasto and Burkert profiles with the most updated parameters. Moreover, we also incorporate the latest models for the inelastic cross-sections of $\bar{p}$ and $\bar{d}$ based on ALICE data. We validate our calculations with those available in the literature or those obtained from other publicly available numerical packages. We compare the CR fluxes obtained in this work with those provided previously by $\texttt{PPPC4DMID}$ which were based on old propagation scenarios. We find that the CR fluxes obtained here with the new propagation models are much more robust (compared to the older ones) under the variation MIN - MAX. We also discuss the impact of this in the improvement of the discovery potential of a possible DM signal in the light of the present and upcoming CR observations. We provide all our results for the DM-induced interstellar CR fluxes in a tabulated format (for the kinetic energy range 0.1 GeV - 100 TeV) in the $\texttt{GitHub}$ repository of the newly created $\texttt{CosmiXsPPPC}$ project. The results are ready to be used for studies related to DM indirect searches.2026-06-08T18:05:14Z26 pages, 14 figures, 1 table. v2: metadata corrected. The results are available at https://github.com/CosmiXsPPPCMarco CirelliMattia Di MauroArpan Karhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.09971v11Do SN 1987A data yield the three neutrino masses?2026-06-17T12:54:17ZCurrently only upper limits are known for the neutrino masses based on cosmological constraints and direct neutrino mass experiments. This review explores the possibility that SN 1987A might provide actual values for the three neutrino masses and not just upper limits, a possibility first suggested by Ramanath Cowsik in 1988. Cowsik's result depends on the neutrino emissions from SN 1987A being near-simultaneous, i.e., within a time interval $Δt<1 s.$ Having such a brief burst, however, is contradicted by virtually all supernova neutrino emission models that include a $Δt>10 s$ cooling phase. Here it is explained why those neutrino emission models may be mistaken, and why the three neutrino masses suggested by the SN 1987A data might be correct even though they are larger than the upper limits implied from cosmology and direct mass experiments.2025-12-10T14:12:03ZRobert Ehrlichhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18962v1The flash-ionised SN Ibn 2025kzr: H-free CSM formed during a precursor outburst 55 days prior to explosion2026-06-17T11:42:24ZType Ibn supernovae (SNe) are a class of interacting SNe characterised by narrow helium lines in their spectra. We present an extensive observational dataset of the Type Ibn SN 2025kzr at 51 Mpc, including the discovery of a precursor outburst with a peak brightness of M_r~-13.6 mag beginning ~55 days before explosion. Our photometry indicates the SN was discovered within the first day of explosion, showing fast-rising, ultraviolet-bright emission peaking at M_r=-19.26+/-0.09 mag and a peak blackbody temperature of T~29000 K, consistent with shock breakout within a region of dense and confined circumstellar material (CSM). Our high-cadence spectroscopic dataset spanning 1.9-58.5 days post-explosion shows flash-ionised emission features during the first 10 days. In our SALT spectrum at 3.8 days we observe a pronounced blueshift of the He II lines by 460 km/s compared to the He I lines at zero velocity, while a Pickering-decrement analysis reveals a CSM that is fully hydrogen-free. The timing of the disappearance of the flash features combined with the CSM velocity of 1500 km/s imply a mass-loss event ~66 days before explosion, in close agreement with the timing of the precursor observed 55 days before explosion and strongly suggestive of a physical link. We derive a CSM mass of 0.03-1.7 M_sun and a corresponding high mass-loss rate >~10^{-1} M_sun/yr. The precursor timescale and energetics suggest an extreme mass-loss event that might be explained by wave-driven mass loss during the late stages of nuclear burning, in particular the oxygen-burning phase. Overall, we favour a single massive Wolf-Rayet progenitor with M_ZAMS~30-40 M_sun to explain SN 2025kzr, although a binary origin cannot be excluded.2026-06-17T11:42:24Z28 pages, 20 figures. Submitted to A&AS. de WetG. LeloudasD. A. H. BuckleyN. ErasmusP. J. GrootE. A. ZimmermanP. ChenY. TampoM. PursiainenT. KillesteinF. StoppaG. K. JaisawalA. Gal-YamK. MaedaJ. AndersonT. -W. ChenM. GromadzkiC. P. GutiérrezE. KankareT. E. Müller-BravoT. PessiS. SmarttJ. SollermanL. TartagliaD. R. YoungM. R. AlarconK. W. SmithH. F. StevanceT. de BoerK. ChambersC. -C. LinT. B. LoweP. MinguezM. NichollG. S. H. PaekR. J. Wainscoathttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18912v1A thick-shell formalism for pulsar wind nebulae based on energy conservation2026-06-17T10:38:26ZOne of the most powerful approaches to model the structural and spectral evolution of wind bubbles, and pulsar wind nebulae in particular, is based on the one-zone thin-shell formalism. By solving a set of simple equations, one can relate the spectral properties of these systems to the physical properties of the pulsar and supernova remnant. Due to its predictive power, this approach has been widely used both to fit existing objects and in population synthesis. However, there are inconsistencies when applied to the Crab nebula that have never been fully accounted for, casting doubts on its reliability. We introduce a new and more flexible formalism based on energy conservation that reconciles the observed structural and spectral properties of the Crab nebula, solving the inconsistencies, and provides a more realistic description of wind-bubble evolution. The equations of the formalism are presented and discussed, together with simplified solutions and more complex ones including radiation losses. Implications for the modeling of wind bubbles and pulsar wind nebulae are illustrated. We also introduce a new high-order upwind-implicit scheme for particle-spectrum evolution that ensures high accuracy in energy conservation, and an algebraic-vectorizable approach for synchrotron self-Compton emission in the full Klein-Nishina regime that avoids costly interpolations and integrations. We reproduce the Crab nebula structural properties and spectrum, accounting for the difference in convergence age between the optical filaments and the radio bubble, thereby removing the inconsistencies. The spectral accuracy of this approach is comparable to that of the standard one, but it is superior in reproducing structural properties and accounting for geometrical effects such as a thick layer of mixed material and the lack of efficient coupling between the wind bubble and the surrounding medium.2026-06-17T10:38:26Z12 pages, 1 figure, submitted to A&AN. BucciantiniINAF Arcetri, UniFi, INFN FirenzeB. OlmiINAF Arcetrihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27090v2Open Data from LIGO, Virgo, and KAGRA through the Second Part of the Fourth Observing Run2026-06-17T09:59:43ZLIGO, Virgo, KAGRA, and GEO 600 form a network of gravitational-wave observatories. Data and analysis results from this network are made publicly available through the Gravitational Wave Open Science Center (GWOSC). This paper describes open data from this network, including the addition of data from the second part of the fourth observing run (O4b) and selected periods from the preceding engineering run (ER16), which were collected from times spanning April 6th, 2024 to January 28th, 2025. The public data set includes calibrated strain time series for each instrument, data from additional channels used for noise subtraction and detector characterization, and new analysis data products in the online GWOSC release associated with version 5.0 of the Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog.2026-05-26T14:36:19ZThis version has an updated author list, updated references and some text has been modified to improve clarity. This article draws heavily from the corresponding O4a article, arXiv:2508.18079 The LIGO Scientific Collaboration the Virgo Collaboration the KAGRA CollaborationA. G. AbacA. AbeI. AbouelfettouhF. AcerneseK. AckleyA. AdamS. AdhicaryD. AdhikariR. X. AdhikariV. K. AdkinsS. AfrozA. AgapitoD. AgarwalM. AgathosN. AggarwalS. AggarwalO. D. AguiarI. -L. AhrendL. AielloA. AinP. AjithT. AkutsuL. AlbersW. AliS. Al-KershiC. AlleneA. AlloccaS. Al-ShammariJ. A. AlvarezS. Alvarez-LopezW. AmarO. AmarasingheA. AmatoF. AmicucciC. AmraA. B. AnandC. AnandA. AnanyevaS. B. AndersonW. G. AndersonM. AndiaM. AndoF. Andrade-OliveiraM. Andrés-CarcasonaJ. L. AndreyT. AndrićJ. AnglinJ. AnnaJ. M. AntelisS. AntierT. AokiM. AoumiE. Z. AppavuravtherE. A. AppeltS. AppertS. K. AppleK. AraiA. ArayaM. C. ArayaM. Arca SeddaF. ArcipreteJ. S. AreedaN. AritomiF. ArmatoS. ArmstrongN. ArnaudM. ArogetiS. M. AronsonG. AshtonY. AsoL. AspreaM. AssiduoS. Assis de Souza MeloS. M. AstonP. AstoneP. S. AswathiF. AttadioF. AubinK. AultONealG. AvalloneN. AvdeevE. A. AvilaS. BabakC. BadgerS. BaeS. BagnascoS. BaimukhametovaL. BaiottiT. BakaK. A. BakerT. BakerG. BalbiG. BaldiN. BaldicchiM. BallG. BallardinM. BallelliS. W. BallmerS. BanagiriB. BanerjeeD. BankarT. M. BaptisteP. BaralM. BarattiJ. C. BarayogaK. BaricB. C. BarishD. BarkerN. BarmanF. BaroneB. BarrM. BarriosL. BarsottiM. BarsugliaD. BartaM. A. BartonI. BartosA. BasalaevR. BassiriA. BastiM. BawajJ. C. BayleyA. C. BaylorP. A. BaynardM. BazzanV. M. BedakihaleF. BeirnaertM. BejgerA. S. BellC. BellaniD. S. BellieD. Beltran-MartinezE. BenedettiW. BenoitI. BentaraM. Ben YaalaS. BeraF. BergaminB. K. BergerM. BeroizC. P. L. BerryI. BerryD. BersanettiT. BertheasA. BertoliniJ. BetzwieserD. BeveridgeN. BevinsJ. Bezerra-SobrinhoR. BhandareR. BhattA. BhattacharjeeD. BhattacharjeeS. BhattacharyyaS. BhaumikV. BiancalanaF. BianchiI. A. BilenkoM. BilickiG. BillingsleyA. BinettiS. BiniS. BiotO. BirnholtzS. BiscoveanuA. BishtM. BitossiM. -A. BizouardS. BlaberJ. K. BlackburnL. A. BlaggC. D. BlairD. G. BlairM. BlochN. BodeN. BoettnerP. BogdanG. BoileauM. BoldriniG. N. BolingbrokeL. D. BonavenaV. A. BonhommeE. BonillaM. S. BonillaA. BoninoR. BonnandA. BorchersN. BorghiV. BoschiS. BoseV. BossilkovY. BothraA. BoudonT. D. BoybeyiM. BoyleA. BozziC. BradaschiaM. J. BradyP. R. BradyA. BranchM. BranchesiT. BriantA. BrilletM. BrinkmannP. BrockillE. BrockmuellerA. F. BrooksD. D. BrownM. L. BrozzettiS. BrunettG. BrunoR. BruntzJ. BryantY. BuF. BucciA. BuchicchioA. BuggianiO. BulashenkoT. BulikH. J. BultenA. BuonannoK. BurtnykR. BuscicchioN. BusdonD. BuskulicR. L. ByerR. CabritaV. A. Cáceres-BarbosaL. CadonatiG. CagnoliC. CahillaneA. CalafatJ. Calderón BustilloJ. D. CallaghanT. A. CallisterE. CalloniS. R. CallosK. CannonV. CantoryH. CaoL. A. CapistranE. CapocasaG. CapocciaE. CapoteC. CapuanoG. CapurriF. CarbognaniK. J. Cardona-MartínezM. CarlassaraM. CarpinelliG. CarrilloG. CarulloA. Casallas-LagosJ. Casanueva DiazC. CasentiniS. CaudillM. CavagliàR. CavalieriA. CejaG. CellaP. Cerdá-DuránE. CesariniN. ChabbraW. ChaibiA. ChakrabortyP. ChakrabortyS. ChakrabortyS. Chalathadka SubrahmanyaC. ChanJ. C. L. ChanM. ChanC. -Y. ChangK. ChangS. ChaoP. CharltonE. Chassande-MottinC. ChatterjeeDebarati ChatterjeeDeep ChatterjeeM. ChaturvediS. ChatyK. ChatziioannouA. ChenA. H. -Y. ChenD. ChenH. ChenH. Y. ChenS. ChenYanbei ChenYiwen ChenG. ChengH. P. ChengP. ChessaT. CheunchitraH. T. CheungS. Y. CheungF. ChiadiniG. ChiariniA. ChibaA. ChincariniD. ChintalaA. ChiummoA. ChopraC. ChouS. ChoudharyN. ChristensenY. K. ChuS. S. Y. ChuaG. CianiP. CiecielagM. CieślarM. CifaldiB. CirokF. ClaraJ. A. ClarkT. A. ClarkeA. ClaveusM. R. ClaypoolS. ClesseF. ClevaS. M. ClyneE. CocciaE. CodazzoP. -F. CohadonD. E. CohenE. ColangeliO. ColeM. ColleoniC. G. ColletteJ. CollinsS. CollomsA. ColomboG. CompèreC. M. ComptonG. ConnollyL. ContiT. R. CorbittI. Cordero-CarriónS. CorezziN. J. CornishA. CorsiS. CorteseL. A. CoruboloL. CotnoirR. CottinghamJ. A. CotturoneM. W. CoughlinP. CouvaresR. CoyneA. CozzumboJ. D. E. CreightonT. D. CreightonS. CrookR. CrouchJ. CsizmaziaK. CsukásT. J. CullenA. CummingE. CuocoM. CusinatoR. R. CuzinattoL. V. da ConceiçãoT. Dal CantonS. Dall'OssoS. Dal PraG. DályaY. DangB. D'AngeloS. DanilishinO. DannerS. D'AntonioK. DanzmannK. E. DarrochL. P. DartezR. DasS. DasA. DasguptaV. DattiloA. DaumasI. DaveA. DavenportT. F. DaviesD. DavisM. C. DavisP. DavisE. J. DawM. DaxJ. De BolleE. deBruinM. DeenadayalanJ. DegallaixM. De LaurentisC. J. Delgado MendezF. De LilloS. Della TorreW. Del PozzoO. M. del RioA. DemagnyF. De MarcoG. DemasiF. De MatteisC. de MeloN. DemosT. DentA. DepasseN. DePergolaR. De PietriR. De RosaC. De RossiE. K. DerrickM. DesaiD. DeSantisS. DeshmukhV. DeshmukhR. De SimoneS. DetermanS. DhageA. DhaniR. DhatriR. DhurkundeR. DiabC. DiazM. C. DíazF. Diaz GuerraM. Di CesareM. A. DicoratoT. DietrichC. Di FronzoM. Di GiovanniD. DikshaJ. DingS. Di PaceI. Di PalmaD. Di PieroF. Di Renzo DivyajyotiA. DmitrievJ. P. DochertyZ. DoctorN. DoerksenE. DohmenA. DokeA. Domiciano De SouzaL. D'OnofrioF. DonovanK. L. DooleyS. DoravariO. DoroshF. DosopoulouM. DragoJ. C. DriggersM. DuboisR. S. DumbreckU. DupletsaD. D'UrsoP. Dutta RoyH. DuvalP. -A. DuverneS. DwivediS. E. DwyerC. EassaM. EberhardtM. EbersoldM. EbiriG. EddollsA. EfflerJ. EichholzH. EinsleM. EisenmannM. EmmaK. EndoR. EnficiaudV. ErnstL. ErricoR. EspinosaM. EspositoR. C. EssickH. EstellésT. EtzelM. EvansT. EvstafyevaJ. M. EzquiagaF. FabriziV. FafoneS. FairhurstX. FanA. M. FarahB. FarrW. M. FarrM. FavataM. FaysM. FazioJ. FeichtM. M. FejerJ. -N. FeldhusenE. FenyvesiA. FeoJ. FernandesT. FernandesG. Fernández RodríguezD. FernandoS. FerraiuoloT. A. FerreiraM. Ferrer-MartinezF. FidecaroP. FiguraI. FioriM. FishbachR. P. FisherS. K. FitzgeraldV. FiumaraR. FlaminioB. FlanaganS. M. FleischerL. S. FlemingF. FloccoE. FlodenH. FongJ. A. FontF. Fontinele-NunesC. FooB. FornalP. W. F. ForsythA. FragkosN. FranchiniA. Franco-OrdovasF. FrappezF. FrasconiJ. P. FreedZ. FreiA. FreiseO. FreitasR. FreyW. FrischhertzP. FritschelV. V. FrolovM. Fuentes-GarciaR. FujiiT. FujimoriY. FujiwaraP. FuldaM. FyffeJ. R. GairS. GalaudageV. GaldiM. GalimbertiA. GamboaS. GamojiA. GangulyB. GaraventaP. García AbiaJ. García-BellidoC. García-QuirósJ. W. GardnerS. GargJ. GargiuloX. GarridoA. GarronF. GarufiP. A. GarverC. GasbarraF. GautierV. GayathriT. GayerG. GemmeA. GennaiV. GennariJ. GeorgeR. GeorgeO. GerberdingL. GergelyA. GhinassiArchisman GhoshSayantan GhoshShaon GhoshShrobana GhoshSuprovo GhoshTathagata GhoshJ. A. GiaimeK. D. GiardinaD. R. GibsonC. GierF. GittinsJ. GlanzerF. GlotinE. GlowackiJ. GodfreyR. V. GodleyO. GodwinA. S. GoettelE. GoetzJ. GolombS. Gomez LopezG. GonzálezP. GoodarziS. R. GoodeA. Goodwin-JonesM. GosselinS. M. Goss-GrubbsC. GostiauxR. GouatyD. W. GouldD. GoupilliereK. GovorkovaA. GradoV. GrahamA. E. GranadosM. GranataV. GranataS. GrasP. GrassiaC. GrayR. GrayG. GrecoA. C. GreenL. GreenS. R. GreenA. M. GretarssonE. M. GretarssonD. GriffithC. GrimaudH. GroteS. GrunewaldA. G. GuerreroG. M. GuidiT. GuidryH. K. GulatiF. GulminelliH. GuoW. GuoY. GuoA. GuptaI. GuptaN. C. GuptaS. K. GuptaV. GuptaN. GupteN. GuttmanF. GuzmanM. HaberlandS. HainoE. D. HallE. Z. HamiltonG. HammondW. -B. HanM. HaneyJ. HanksC. HannaM. D. HannamO. A. HannukselaH. HansenJ. HansonR. HaradaA. R. HardisonS. HarikumarK. HarisI. Harley-TrochimczykJ. HarmsG. M. HarryI. W. HarryM. T. HartmanB. HaskellC. -J. HasterK. HaughianH. HayakawaK. HayamaJ. HedbergA. HeffernanD. HegdeM. C. HeintzeJ. HeinzelH. HeitmannF. HellmanA. F. Helmling-CornellG. HemmingO. Henderson-SapirM. HendryI. S. HengM. H. HennigC. HenshawA. HeranvalM. HeursA. L. HewittJ. HeynenJ. HeynsS. HidoS. HildM. HillS. HillY. HimemotoC. HiroseD. HofmanN. A. HollandK. Holley-BockelmannI. J. HollowsD. E. HolzL. HonetK. M. HoopsM. E. HoqueD. J. Horton-BaileyJ. HoughS. HourihaneN. T. HowardE. J. HowellC. G. HoyP. HsiH. -Y. HsiehC. HsiungS. -H. HsuW. -F. HsuH. Y. HuangY. HuangA. D. HuddartB. HugheyD. C. Y. HuiS. HusaL. IampieriG. A. IandoloM. IanniY. IchinoseK. IdeR. IdenA. IerardiS. IkedaH. ImafukuK. ImaiY. InoueP. IosifJ. IrwinK. IshidaR. IshikawaT. IshikawaH. IshinoM. IsiK. S. IsleifY. ItohS. IwaguchiM. M. IwayaB. R. IyerC. JacquetT. JacquotS. J. JadhavS. P. JadhavK. JainA. L. JamesK. JaniS. JaniJ. JanquartN. N. JanthalurS. JarabaP. JaranowskiR. JaumeW. JavedM. JensenW. JiaJ. JiangH. -B. JinS. -J. JinG. R. JohnsN. A. JohnsonM. C. JohnstonR. JohnstonN. JohnyD. H. JonesD. I. JonesR. JonesP. JoshiS. K. JoshiG. JoubertJ. JuL. JuI. L. Juarez-ReyesK. JungH. B. KabagozB. KacskovicsT. KajitaI. KakuV. KalogeraM. KalomenopoulosM. KamiizumiN. KandaS. KandhasamyG. KangJ. B. KannerS. J. KapadiaD. P. KapasiA. KariaA. S. KariaR. KashyapM. KasprzackH. KatoT. KatoE. KatsavounidisW. KatzmanR. KaushikK. KawabeS. KawamuraD. KeitelS. A. KemperL. J. KempermanJ. KenningtonR. KesharwaniJ. S. KeyR. KhadelaS. S. KhadkikarF. Y. KhaliliC. KhamarF. KhanM. KhursheedN. M. KhusidW. KiendrebeogoC. KimG. KimJ. C. KimK. KimM. H. KimS. KimY. -M. KimC. KimballK. KimesM. KinnearJ. S. KisselS. KlimenkoA. M. KneeN. KnustK. KobayashiS. M. KoehlenbeckK. KohriK. KokeyamaS. KoleyP. KolitsidouA. E. KoloniariK. KomoriK. KompanetsA. K. H. KongA. KontosK. KopczukL. M. KoponenM. KorobkoX. KouN. KouvatsosT. KoyamaD. B. KozakE. KrajaS. L. KranzhoffV. KringelN. V. KrishnenduS. KrokerA. KrólakK. KruskaJ. KubiszK. KubotaG. KuehnD. KuklaA. Kulur RamamohanAchal KumarAnil KumarDhruv KumarPraveen KumarPrayush KumarRahul KumarRakesh KumarRavi KumarJ. KumeK. KunsN. KuntimaddiS. KuroyanagiK. KwakK. KwanS. KwonG. LacailleD. LaghiA. H. LaityN. LajiliA. LakhalE. LalandeM. LallemanS. LalvaniM. LandryR. N. LangA. LangeJ. A. LangeR. LangginB. LantzI. La RosaO. LaskeP. D. LaskyL. LavezziJ. LawrenceM. LaxenA. LazzariniC. LazzaroP. LeaciL. LealiY. K. LecoeucheH. W. LeeJ. LeeK. LeeR. -K. LeeR. LeeSungho LeeSunjae LeeW. LeeY. LeeF. LeggerI. N. LegredJ. LehmannL. LehnerM. Le JeanA. LemaîtreR. Lemrani AlaouiM. LentiM. LeonardiM. LequimeM. LesovskyN. LetendreM. LethuillierY. LevinS. LexmondK. LeydeA. K. Y. LiK. L. LiT. G. F. LiX. LiY. LiZ. LiQ. LiangC-Y. LinE. T. LinF. LinL. C. -C. LinY. -C. LinC. LindsayS. D. LinkerA. LiuF. LiuG. C. LiuJian LiuS. LiuF. Llamas VillarrealJ. Llobera-QuerolR. K. L. LoJ. -P. LocquetS. C. G. LogginsL. T. LondonA. LongoM. Lopez PortillaM. LorenziniA. Lorenzo-MedinaV. LorietteM. LormandM. LorussoG. LosurdoT. P. LottJ. D. LoughH. A. LoughlinC. O. LoustoN. K. Y. LowN. LuH. LückO. LukinaD. LumacaA. P. LundgrenL. LunghiniA. W. LussierL. -T. MaX. MaM. Ma'arifS. MacBrideK. MachidaD. M. MacleodI. A. O. MacMillanA. MacquetS. S. MadekarS. MaenautS. S. MagareR. M. MageeE. MaggioM. MagnozziP. MahapatraM. MaheshS. MajhiE. MajoranaC. N. MakaremE. MakeleleN. MalagonD. MalakarJ. A. Malaquias-ReisU. MaliS. MaliakalA. MalikL. MallickA. -K. MalzN. ManM. MancarellaV. MandicV. ManganoZ. MangiB. MannixG. L. MansellM. ManskeM. MantovaniM. MapelliS. MarchettiF. MarionJ. MarkA. S. MarkosyanJ. MarkusE. MarosS. MarsatF. MartelliI. W. MartinR. M. MartinB. B. MartinezM. MartinezV. MartinezA. MartiniJuan Carlos MartinsJulio C. MartinsD. V. MartynovE. J. MarxL. MassaroA. MasserotM. Masso-ReidT. MastersS. MastrogiovanniG. MastropasquaM. MatiushechkinaA. Matte-LandryL. MaurinN. MavalvalaN. MaxwellA. McCannG. McCarrolR. McCarthyD. E. McClellandS. McCormickL. McCullerL. I. McDermottC. McElhennyG. I. McGheeK. B. M. McGowanJ. McIverA. McLeodI. McMahonT. McRaeR. McTeagueK. McWhirterD. MeacherB. N. MeagherR. MechumL. G. MedeirosR. M. MehtaA. MelatosC. S. MenoniR. A. MercerL. MereniK. MerfeldE. L. MerilhJ. R. MérouC. MessickM. Meyer-CondeF. MeylahnH. MiaoC. MichelY. MichimuraH. MiddletonD. P. MihaylovS. J. MillerM. MillhouseE. MilottiV. MilottiE. MinakakiY. MinenkovLl. M. MirL. MirasolaC. -A. MiritescuA. MishraC. MishraT. MishraA. MitchellJ. G. MitchellO. MitchemS. MitraV. P. MitrofanovK. MitsuhashiR. MittlemanO. MiyakawaS. MiyokiG. MoL. MobiliaS. R. P. MohapatraM. Molina-RuizM. MondinM. MontaniG. MontefuscoC. J. MooreD. MoraruA. MoreS. MoreC. MorenoE. A. MorenoG. MorenoA. Moreso SerraC. MorganS. MorisakiS. MoriwakiY. MoriwakiG. MorrasA. MoscatelloM. MouldB. MoursC. M. Mow-LowryL. MuccilloF. MuciacciaArunava MukherjeeD. MukherjeeSamanwaya MukherjeeSoma MukherjeeSubroto MukherjeeSuvodip MukherjeeN. MukundA. MullaveyC. L. MungioliY. MurakamiM. MurakoshiP. G. MurrayD. NabariS. NadjiA. NagarN. NagarajanK. NakagakiA. NakamuraK. NakamuraH. NakanoM. NakanoD. Nanadoumgar-LacrozeD. NandiV. NapolanoS. U. NaqviP. NarayanA. NardecchiaI. NardecchiaT. NarikawaH. NarolaL. NaticchioniR. K. NayakJ. NeesonL. NegriA. NelaC. NelleA. NelsonT. J. N. NelsonA. NemmaniA. NeunzertM. NewellS. NgT. C. K. NgL. -A. T. NguyenT. T. NguyenL. Nguyen QuynhA. B. NielsenY. NishinoA. NishizawaS. NissankeW. NiuF. NoceraJ. NollerM. NormanC. NorthJ. NovakG. NurbekL. K. NuttallK. ObayashiJ. OberlingC. E. OchoaC. O'ConnorJ. O'DellE. OelkerM. OertelG. OganesyanJ. J. OhT. O'HanlonM. OhashiF. OhmeY. OkabeI. OkeR. OliveiraR. OmerN. O'NeillM. OnishiK. OoharaP. OphardtR. J. OramB. O'ReillyR. O'ShaughnessyS. OshinoJ. OstrovskaA. OsumiI. OtaG. OthmanM. OtsukaD. J. OttawayA. OuzriatH. OvermierB. J. OwenA. E. PaceM. A. PageA. PaiS. PalM. A. PalaiaM. PálfiC. PalombaH. PanJ. PanK. -C. PanP. K. PandaShiksha PandeySwadha PandeyP. T. H. PangF. PannaraleB. C. PantF. H. PantherM. PanzeriF. PaolettiA. PaoliA. PaoloneA. PapadopoulosE. E. PapalexakisL. PapaliniG. PapigkiotisA. PaquisA. ParisiB. -J. ParkJihwan ParkJunegyu ParkW. ParkerG. PascaleD. PascucciA. PasqualettiL. PassengerD. PassuelloO. PataneA. V. PatelL. PathakA. PatraB. PatricelliB. G. PattersonK. PaulS. PaulE. PayneT. PearceM. PedrazaA. PeleF. E. Peña ArellanoX. PengY. PengS. PennA. PerrecaJ. PerretD. PesiosS. PetraccaC. PetrilloH. P. PfeifferH. PhamK. A. PhamK. S. PhukonH. PhurailatpamL. PiccariO. J. PiccinniM. PichotA. PiedM. PiendibeneF. PiergiovanniL. PieriniG. PierraV. PierroM. PillasB. PillonL. PinardI. M. PintoM. PintoB. J. PiotrzkowskiM. PirelloA. PisarskiM. D. PitkinE. PlacidiM. L. PlanasC. PlunkettR. PoggianiE. PoliniM. PoloJ. PomperL. PompiliJ. PoonE. PorcelliA. S. PorterE. K. PorterC. PosnanskyJ. PowellG. S. PrabhuM. PracchiaA. K. PrajapatiK. PrasaiR. PrasannaP. PrasiaG. PrattenG. PrincipeG. A. ProdiP. ProsperiP. ProspositoA. PuecherJ. PullinM. PunturoP. PuppoM. PürrerH. QiM. QiaoJ. QinG. QuéménerV. QuetschkeP. J. QuinonezR. RadingI. RainhoS. RajaC. RajanB. RajbhandariM. R. Raj SahK. E. RamirezF. A. Ramis VidalM. Ramos ArevaloA. Ramos-BuadesS. RanjanM. RanjbarK. RansomP. RapagnaniB. RattoA. RavichandranA. RayV. RaymondM. RazzanoJ. ReadJ. RedepenningJ. ReganT. RegimbauT. ReichardtS. ReidC. ReisselD. H. ReitzeA. I. RenziniB. RevenuA. Revilla-PeñaF. RicciM. RicciA. RicciardoneJ. RiceJ. W. RichardsonM. L. RichardsonK. RilesH. K. RileyA. RiminucciF. RobinetM. RobinsonA. RocchiJ. RodriguezR. Rodriguez LopezL. RollandJ. G. RollinsA. E. RomanoR. RomanoA. Romero-RodríguezI. M. Romero-ShawJ. H. RomieS. RonchiniT. J. RoockeT. J. RosauerC. A. RoseD. RosińskaM. P. RossM. Rossello-SastreB. I. RotimiS. RowanK. RowlandsS. K. RoyS. RoyT. RoyChowdhuryD. RozzaP. RuggiG. H. RuizE. Ruiz MoralesK. Ruiz-RochaV. RussS. M. SS. SachdevT. SadeckiF. Safai TehraniP. SaffariehS. Safi-HarbS. SahaT. SainratS. Sajith MenonK. SakaiY. SakaiM. SakellariadouS. SakonF. Salces-CarcobaL. SalconiM. SaleemF. SalemiM. SalléM. SaloméS. U. SalunkheS. SalvadorA. SalvareseA. SamajdarP. M. SamirA. SanchezE. J. SanchezJ. SanchezD. Sanchez-CidN. Sanchis-GualJ. R. SandersE. M. SängerF. SantoliquidoE. SapkinF. SarandreaT. R. SaravananP. SarkarA. SasliP. SassiB. SassolasO. SauterR. L. SavageT. SavichevaT. SawadaH. L. SawantD. SchaetzlM. ScheelA. SchiebelbeinM. G. SchiworskiK. SchlutermanP. SchmidtR. SchnabelM. SchneewindR. M. S. SchofieldM. SchoorK. SchoutedenB. W. SchulteM. SchulzB. F. SchutzE. SchwartzM. ScialpiJ. ScottS. M. ScottR. M. SedasT. C. SeetharamuM. Seglar-ArroyoY. SekiguchiD. SellersN. SemboE. G. SeoJ. W. SeoG. SeongV. SequinoM. SerraC. K. SethiA. SevrinT. ShafferU. S. ShahM. A. ShaikhL. ShaoJ. SharkeyA. K. SharmaPreeti SharmaPriyanka SharmaSushant Sharma-ChaudharyP. ShawhanT. ShenZ. -H. ShiK. ShimodeH. ShinkaiS. ShirkeD. H. ShoemakerD. M. ShoemakerR. W. ShortS. ShyamSundarH. SiegelV. SierraD. SiggL. SilenziP. J. S. SilvaL. SilvestriM. SimmondsL. P. SingerA. SinghD. SinghM. K. SinghN. SinghS. SinghM. R. SinhaA. M. SintesV. SklirisB. J. J. SlagmolenT. J. Slaven-BlairJ. SmetanaD. A. SmithJ. R. SmithJ. SmithL. SmithW. J. SmithS. Soares de Albuquerque FilhoM. Soares-SantosK. SomiyaI. SongS. SoniV. SordiniF. SorrentinoH. SotaniN. E. SovitzkyF. SpadaV. SpagnuoloA. P. SpencerM. SperaP. SpinicelliA. K. SrivastavaF. StachurskiV. V. StanfordA. StantonD. A. SteerN. SteinleJ. SteinlechnerS. SteinlechnerC. StephensN. StergioulasM. StPierreJ. StremizM. D. StrongA. StrunkM. SuchenekS. SudhagarR. SugimotoL. SuleimanK. D. SullivanJ. SunL. SunS. SunilJ. SureshP. J. SuttonK. SuzukiM. SuzukiA. SvizzerettoB. L. SwinkelsA. SyxM. J. SzczepańczykM. TaccaM. TagliazucchiH. TagoshiS. C. TaitH. TakabaK. TakadaH. TakahashiR. TakahashiA. TakamoriS. TakanoH. TakedaI. Takimoto SchmiegelowC. TalbotM. TamakiN. TamaniniD. TanabeK. TanakaS. J. TanakaS. TaniokaD. B. TannerW. TannerL. TaoR. D. TapiaE. N. Tapia San MartínA. TaruyaJ. D. TassonJ. G. TauA. TejeraJ. G. TempleY. TengH. ThemannA. TheodoropoulosM. P. ThirugnanasambandamL. M. ThomasM. ThomasP. ThomasJ. E. ThompsonS. R. ThondapuE. ThraneJ. TissinoA. TiwariPawan TiwariPraveer TiwariS. TiwariV. TiwariM. R. ToddE. TofaniM. ToffanoA. M. ToivonenK. TolandT. TomaruV. TommasiniH. TongC. I. TorrieI. Tosta e MeloE. TournefierA. TrapanantiR. TravagliniF. TravassoG. TraylorL. TraylorM. TrevorM. C. TringaliA. TripatheeG. TroianA. TrovatoL. TrozzoR. J. TrudeauT. TsangS. TsuchidaK. TsujiL. TsukadaA. TuciM. TurconiC. TurskiH. UbachA. S. UbhiN. UchikataT. UchiyamaR. P. UdallT. UeharaV. UndheimV. UpadhyayaL. E. UronenT. UshibaM. VacatelloH. VahlbruchG. VajenteJ. ValenciaM. ValentiniE. Vallejo-PagèsS. A. Vallejo-PeñaS. ValleroM. van DaelE. Van den BosscheJ. F. J. van den BrandC. Van Den BroeckM. van der KolkM. van der SluysA. Van de WalleJ. van DongenK. VandraM. VanDykeH. van HaevermaetJ. V. van HeijningenP. Van HoveJ. VanierJ. VanoskyN. van RemortelM. VardaroA. F. VargasV. VarmaA. VecchioG. VedovatoJ. VeitchP. J. VeitchS. VenikoudisP. VerdierM. VereeckenD. VerkindtB. VermaS. VermaY. VermaS. M. VermeulenF. VetranoA. VeutroA. ViceréS. VidyantA. D. VietsA. VijaykumarA. VilkhaN. Villanueva EspinosaE. T. VincentJ. -Y. VinetS. ViretS. VitaleA. VivesL. VizmegB. VizzoneH. VoccaD. VoigtE. R. G. von ReisJ. S. A. von WrangelW. E. VossiusL. VujevaS. P. VyatchaninJ. WackL. E. WadeM. WadeK. J. WagnerL. WallaceR. -Z. WanH. WangP. WangW. H. WangY. F. WangZ. WangR. L. WardJ. WarnerM. WasT. WashimiN. Y. WashingtonD. WataraiB. WeaverS. A. WebsterN. L. WeickhardtM. WeinertA. J. WeinsteinR. WeissL. WenK. WetteC. WheelerJ. T. WhelanB. F. WhitingE. G. WickensD. WilkenB. M. WilliamsD. WilliamsM. J. WilliamsN. S. WilliamsJ. L. WillisB. WillkeM. WilsL. WimmerC. W. WinbornA. WingfieldJ. WinterfloodC. C. WipfG. WoanN. E. WolfeH. T. WongI. C. F. WongT. WoutersJ. L. WrightM. WrightB. WuC. WuD. S. WuH. WuK. WuZ. WuE. WuchnerD. M. WysockiV. A. XuY. XuN. YadavH. YamamotoK. YamamotoT. S. YamamotoT. YamamotoR. YamazakiT. YanH. YangK. Z. YangY. YangZ. YarbroughJ. Yébana CarrileroA. B. YelikarX. YinJ. YokoyamaT. YokozawaM. YoshiharaS. YuanH. YuzuriharaM. ZanattaM. ZanolinM. ZeeshanT. ZelenovaJ. -P. ZendriM. ZeoliM. ZerradM. ZevinH. ZhangJ. ZhangL. ZhangN. ZhangR. ZhangT. ZhangC. ZhaoJ. ZhaoYue ZhaoYuhang ZhaoL. -M. ZhengY. ZhengL. ZhizhongH. ZhongH. ZhouH. O. ZhuX. -J. ZhuZ. -H. ZhuZ. ZhuD. Z. ZiebaA. B. ZimmermanL. ZimmermannM. E. Zuckerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18881v1Pinning Down the Geometry of the Type Ic Broad-Line Supernova 2026gzf2026-06-17T09:58:13ZType Ic broad-line supernovae (SNe Ic-BL) are often associated with energetic explosions that display a prompt outburst of high-energy emission. Since their progenitor lost the H and He envelopes before the explosion exposing the C/O core, their explosion dynamics and geometry can be seen in an unobscured and undistorted way. We present imaging polarimetry and spectropolarimetry of the Type Ic-BL SN 2026gzf obtained 4.6 and 16.5 days after the X-ray shock breakout, which was recorded by the Einstein Probe satellite as EP260321a, showing it to be one of the softest and intrinsically dimmest extragalactic fast X-ray transients. The persistent low continuum polarization indicates that the outer layer of SN 2026gzf is mostly spherical, suggesting the explosion did not significantly disrupt the progenitor envelope. At day 16.5, the calcium near-infrared triplet displays a peak polarization above 1.5%. The geometry of the associated line opacity is also compatible with an axisymmetric configuration. The spatial distribution of such oxygen-burning ashes thus indicates the presence of a symmetry axis of the excitation structure within the nearly spherical ejecta. The Ca II triplet profile is dominated by a primary component spanning ~25,000--40,000 km/s, alongside a distinct secondary component extending above 28,000 km/s whose polarization implies a non-axisymmetric, complex excitation geometry toward the outer ejecta By implementing a three-dimensional Monte-Carlo calculation, we infer that a viewing angle of ~40 degree from the symmetry axis of the excitation structure could plausibly reproduce the observed spectral and polarization profiles of the Ca II triplet.2026-06-17T09:58:13Z10 pages, 3 figuresXudong WenYi YangJing LuLifan WangJ. Craig WheelerMiika PursiainenQiuJu HuangBao WangXuefeng WuAlexei V. FilippenkoWolfgang E. KerzendorfGiorgos LeloudasSteve SchulzeFerdinando Patathttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18842v1\texttt{TransFit-MAG}: Self-Consistent Modeling of Magnetar-Powered Transients from Shock Breakout to Spin-Down Heating2026-06-17T09:20:26ZMagnetar engines are widely invoked to power luminous optical transients, but their early emission depends on the coupled evolution of engine injection, shock heating, adiabatic cooling, and radiative diffusion. We present \texttt{TransFit-MAG}, a time-dependent radiative-diffusion framework for magnetar-powered transients. The model couples the \texttt{TransFit} diffusion solver to the dynamics of a magnetar-inflated pulsar wind nebula (PWN) and its forward shock propagating through homologously expanding ejecta, calculating the internal radiation-energy distribution, photospheric evolution, shock-heating location, and emergent luminosity self-consistently. For different parameter values, the model naturally produces well-separated double peaks, partially merged peaks, or single broad peaks. These results suggest that early bumps and broad single peaks in engine-powered transients may be understood within a unified engine--shock--diffusion framework, in which the observed diversity reflects the coupled evolution of central-engine power, shock propagation, and radiative transport through expanding ejecta. As an illustrative application, we fit the multiband optical light curves of the double-peaked SLSN-I LSQ14bdq.2026-06-17T09:20:26Z11 pages, 4 figuresJing-Yao LiLiang-Duan LiuYun-Wei YuGuang-Lei WuYu-Hao Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2601.14257v2A self-consistent explanation of the MeV line in GRB 221009A unveils a dense circum-stellar medium2026-06-17T08:48:18ZGRB~221009A has been the brightest gamma-ray burst (GRB) observed to date, and its afterglow has been characterized with unprecedented detail at TeV energies by LHAASO. Quite puzzlingly, it is also the most energetic GRB known. Among the riddles posed by this mysterious source, however, the sheer energetics are hardly the most intriguing: an unprecedented emission line at around 10 MeV has been uncovered by a detailed spectral analysis of Fermi/GBM data immediately following the brightest peak in the GRB prompt emission and the peak of the TeV afterglow. The temporal evolution of the line properties can be explained as high-latitude emission from a geometrically thin, relativistically expanding shell where annihilation of a large number of electron-positron pairs took place. We show that this interpretation yields stringent constraints on the properties of such shell, that point to a process that happens at radii typical of external shocks. We then demonstrate that the shell could have been the blastwave associated with the GRB precursor, with the line arising after pair loading of such blastwave as it was illuminated by the bright and hard radiation of the GRB. The scenario, which also explains the abrupt initial rise of the LHAASO afterglow, requires the progenitor of the GRB to have been surrounded by a circum-stellar medium (CSM) extending out to a few 10^15 cm, with a density 10^8-10^9 cm-3 reminiscent of those found in Type IIn supernovae. The consequences of such a CSM on the dynamics and emission of the external shock are yet to be fully explored. If future, more detailed work will confirm the compatibility of the GRB 221009A afterglow with our scenario, this will provide a precious clue to the nature of the progenitor of this peculiar GRB, which could also be present in other bursts that feature a long quiescence followed by a bright emission episode with a hard spectrum.2026-01-20T18:59:58Z20 pages, 9 figures. Final version accepted for publication on A&AO. S. SalafiaA. CelottiE. SobacchiL. NavaG. OganesyanG. GhirlandaS. BoulaM. E. RavasioG. Ghisellinihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18823v1Discovery of a 24-millisecond pulsar in a very long orbit with the Murchison Widefield Array2026-06-17T08:45:23ZWe report the discovery of PSR J0125$-$5854, a pulsar with a spin period of 24 ms and a dispersion measure of 11.66 pc cm$^-3$ in the ongoing Southern-sky MWA Rapid Two-metre (SMART) survey with the Murchison Widefield Array (MWA). The pulsar is located at a high Galactic latitude of $-57^{\circ}$, and at a distance of 0.5$\text{-}$1 kpc per the Galactic electron density models. Follow-up observations with the MWA and MeerKAT telescopes have revealed that this pulsar is in a binary system with an orbital period of more than 290 days, and a steep spectrum (flux density, $ S \propto ν^α $, where $ν$ is frequency and $ α= -2.2 \pm 0.3 $). Analysis of current observational data hints at a potential binary configuration with an orbital period of $833.60 \pm 0.04$ days, a projected semi-major axis of $241.36 \pm 0.05$ light-seconds, and a minimum companion mass $0.4152 \pm 0.0001$ M$_\odot$, with a low eccentricity orbit of $0.0052 \pm 0.0006$. We discuss the potential formation channels for this system, and conjecture that the companion is likely a Helium white dwarf. Further observations are required in order to better constrain the orbital and spin parameters. We discuss the implications of this discovery, which emerged after processing a small fraction of survey data, on the prospects of finding more millisecond pulsars with the SMART survey, and with future surveys planned with the low-frequency SKA-Low.2026-06-17T08:45:23Z18 pages, 13 figures, accepted for publication in ApJLChia Min TanN. D. Ramesh BhatBradley W. MeyersChristopher P. LeeEwan D. BarrVivek Venkatraman KrishnanPaulo C. C. FreireGarvit GroverSamuel J. McSweeneyNicholas A. SwainstonQiuyang FuMengyao Xue10.3847/2041-8213/ae7de5http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26196v2Challenges in Binary Pulsar Timing Detection of Dark Matter Subhalos2026-06-17T08:29:29ZRecently, binary pulsar timing has been proposed as a viable probe of dark matter subhalos with masses of $\sim 10^7\,M_{\odot}$ in the solar neighborhood. We present a comprehensive analytical framework that incorporates the subhalo mass function, projection effects of line-of-sight acceleration, and the spatiotemporal geometric requirements for joint detection by binary systems, enabling a quantitative evaluation of the detectability of nearby subhalos. Applying this framework to the current binary pulsar sample, we find a probability $\leq 1.7 \times 10^{-4}$ of detecting at least one subhalo within the effective volume. An independent timing residual analysis shows no statistically significant excess in line-of-sight accelerations beyond predictions from data-driven Galactic gravitational potential models. These results place stringent constraints on detecting $<10^8~M_{\odot}$ dark matter subhalos with existing pulsar timing data, aligning with the theoretical expectation that such subhalos have a low survival probability in the solar neighborhood. A low detection prospect still holds even for future Square Kilometre Array observations.2026-03-27T09:16:30Z8 pages, 2 figures, accepted for publication in ApJLZheng-Long WangZi-Qing XiaYue-Lin Sming TsaiYi-Zhong Fanhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18798v1The Array Control and Data Acquisition software of the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory2026-06-17T08:11:24ZThe Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory (CTAO) aims to advance knowledge of the gamma-ray sky as the largest gamma-ray observatory ever built. The CTAO will be deployed at two sites, one in the Northern Hemisphere and the other in the Southern Hemisphere, containing telescopes of three sizes to cover different energy domains. Commissioning of the prototype CTAO Large-Sized Telescope (LST-1) is being finalized at the northern site, while three additional LSTs are under construction. Additional calibration and environmental monitoring instruments, such as laser imaging detection and ranging (LIDAR) systems and weather stations, will support telescope operations. The Array Control and Data Acquisition (ACADA) system serves as the central element for on-site CTAO operations. ACADA controls, supervises, and handles the data generated by the telescopes and the auxiliary instruments. It drives the efficient planning and execution of observations while managing the multi-gigabit-per-second data streams produced by each CTAO telescope. The ACADA system contains the CTAO Science Alert Generation Pipeline - a real-time data processing and analysis pipeline, dedicated to automatically generating science alert candidates as data are acquired. These science alerts, along with external alerts received from other scientific instruments, are managed by the Transients Handler (TH) component. The TH informs ACADA's Short-Term Scheduler (STS) about relevant science alerts, enabling modification of ongoing observations on sub-minute timescales. This capability for rapid response, combined with the fast slewing of CTAO telescopes, makes the Observatory an excellent instrument for studying high-impact astronomical transients.2026-06-17T08:11:24ZAccepted version. Published in Astronomy and Computing (2026). DOI: 10.1016/j.ascom.2026.101147Astronomy and Computing, Volume 57, 2026, 101147I. OyaB. LópezP. AubertG. BarniP. BauzaD. BergeJ. -P. BolleW. BoulakbechP. BrunoU. BajcA. BulgarelliM. CappiF. CassolS. CaroffL. CastaldiniT. CollinsV. ConfortiA. CostaL. DavidG. De CesareE. de Ona WilhelmiA. Di PianoK. EgbertsR. FernandezV. FiorettiS. FukamiE. GarcíaE. GarciaH. GasparyanS. GermaniJ. HintonC. HoischenF. IncardonaD. KostuninE. LyardG. MaurinD. MelkumyanE. MestreK. MunariT. MurachA. MuraczewskiN. NakhjiriD. NeiseT. OprinsenG. PanebiancoN. ParmiggianiE. PietrigaV. PolletB. RudakI. SadehS. SahA. SarkarM. ScheferT. SchmidtD. SoldevilaS. SpinelloC. SteppaD. F. TorresA. TramacereR. VallésT. VuillaumeR. WalterF. WernerA. Wörheide10.1016/j.ascom.2026.101147http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.10792v2Electromagnetic Signatures of Supermassive Binary Black Holes: Synchrotron, Self-Lensing Flares, and Jet Precession2026-06-17T07:56:51ZThe recent evidence for a nanohertz gravitational wave background from Pulsar Timing Arrays highlights the urgent need to identify electromagnetic counterparts to supermassive binary black holes. Here, we perform global 3D general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic (GRMHD) simulations of a secondary black hole (mass ratio $q=0.1$) interacting with a Magnetically Arrested Disk around a primary black hole using a time-dependent superposed Kerr-Schild metric and post-processed general relativistic radiation transfer calculations based on thermal electron distribution function (eDF). We explore three orbital configurations: a vertical impact orbit, a coplanar embedded orbit, and a high-spin, eccentric, inclined scenario. Despite clear orbital periodicity and recurrent shock formation, the thermal synchrotron light curves frequently lack expected shock-induced flares. In vertical impacts, shock brightenings are typically sub-dominant to the stochastic MAD variability of the primary black hole, unless viewed at specific alignment phases. Conversely, coplanar orbits produce distinctive, rapid flares driven by gravitational self-lensing. We identify a frequency-dependent emission hierarchy: the primary black hole dominates sub-millimeter flux, while the secondary dominates near-infrared emission due to higher electron temperatures in thermal eDF. Finally, spin-orbit coupling drives Lense-Thirring precession, yielding twisted, wobbling jets that following the tilt and precession of the primary BH. Crucially, we show that intrinsic MAD turbulence can easily mask shock-induced radio flares, making self-lensing flares a more reliable electromagnetic counterpart candidate for supermassive binary black holes.2026-03-11T14:03:08Z22 pages, 16 figures, accepted by ApJHong-Xuan JiangXinyu LiJing-Ze XiaYosuke MizunoZiri YounsiChristian M. Frommhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.04519v2Emergence of cyclic flux eruptions in kinetic simulations of magnetized spherical accretion onto a Schwarzschild black hole2026-06-17T07:48:36ZThe dynamics of black hole magnetospheres critically depend on the black hole spin and on the structure of the accretion flow. In the limit of a Schwarzschild black hole immersed in a zero-net angular momentum flow, accretion is spherical. However, in the presence of a large-scale vertical magnetic field, the classical Bondi accretion model is significantly altered. The frozen-in field is stretched radially as the plasma is pulled inward by gravity. This continues until the restoring force from the magnetic tension suddenly expels the material and resets the field, allowing a new cycle to begin. Although this scenario has been well depicted in previous studies, it remains incomplete as the issues of dissipation and particle acceleration are not yet fully resolved. In this work, we aim to revisit these issues with a first-principles kinetic plasma model. We perform two-dimensional global general relativistic particle-in-cell simulations of magnetized spherical accretion onto a Schwarzschild black hole, for both pair and electron-ion plasmas. The simulations are evolved over long timescales to capture multiple flux eruption events and establish a quasi-steady state. For each accretion cycle, we find that the system goes through three main stages: (i) an ideal advection phase where magnetic flux through the horizon increases quasi-linearly with time; (ii) a reconnection-regulated phase where the net increase of the flux is slowed down by intermittent reconnection events near the horizon; and (iii) a flaring phase when a major, large-scale reconnection event expels the flux, leading to efficient particle acceleration. The emergence of large-amplitude quasi-periodic flux eruptions and concomitant particle acceleration is reminiscent of Sgr A* flaring activity. This phenomenon could also be applicable to quiescent black holes, especially isolated black holes accreting the interstellar medium.2026-02-04T13:07:37Z12 pages, 9 figures, accepted in A&AEnzo FigueiredoJohn MehlhaffAdrien SoudaisBenoît Ceruttihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2606.18775v1Implications of Adler-Finch-Skea solution on charged dark energy star satisfying Karmarkar Condition2026-06-17T07:35:29ZA possible approach for preventing compact astrophysical objects from gravitational collapse into singularities is the idea of dark energy. Since it is the cause of our universe's accelerated expansion, it has the greatest impact on the cosmos. As a result, it appears that dark energy can interact with any compact astrophysical stellar object [Phys. Rev. D 103, 084042 (2021)]. In this study, our primary objective is to develop a simpler model of a charged strange star coupled with anisotropic dark energy admitting the Adler-Finch-Skea solution [J. Math. Phys. 15, 727 (1974); Class. Quantum Grav. 6, 467 (1989)] within Einstein gravity. To develop this model, the Karmarkar condition was employed to determine the radial metric component, while Adler's methodology was used to choose the time-metric component. For this purpose, we explored a particular strange star, Her X-1, with observed values of mass $(0.85 \pm 0.15)M_{\odot}$ and radius $= 8.1_{-0.41}^{+0.41}$ km. In this context, we proceeded to model dark energy using the equation of state (EoS), such that the density of dark energy is proportional to the density of isotropic perfect fluid matter. The unknown constants in the metric were determined by smooth matching using the Darmois-Israel criterion. We conduct an in-depth examination of the stability and force equilibrium of our suggested star framework, as well as several physical characteristics of the model such as the metric function, pressure, density, mass-radius relation, and dark energy parameters. Thus, the physical consistency and stability of the present model are investigated. Therefore, following a comprehensive theoretical investigation, we discovered that our proposed model is singularity free and meets all the stability requirements to be a stable and physically realistic stellar model.2026-06-17T07:35:29Z17 pages, 11 figures, 2 tables. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2308.07167International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics (2026) 2650057Pramit Rej10.1142/S021988782650057X