https://arxiv.org/api/0xUdZAx/Jh7K7kF6lHDwU77T4042026-04-05T22:29:16Z6804525515http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.19193v2The IXPE and multifrequency polarimetric view of the extreme blazars 1ES 1101-232 and RGB J0710+5912026-03-24T12:55:29ZMultiwavelength polarimetry is a powerful tool to probe magnetic field and flow geometries in the relativistic jets of blazars. In this respect, particularly interesting are the sources whose synchrotron emission covers a broad range of frequencies, from radio to X-rays, such as the BL Lac objects of the HSP type. Previous measurements including radio, optical and X-ray data show a clear trend, with the degree of polarization increasing with frequency. Here we report radio, optical and X-ray observations ($Swift$, $Nustar$ and $IXPE$) of 1ES 1101-232 and RGB J0710+591, two blazars belonging to the puzzling subclass of extreme BL Lacs (EHBL). For 1ES 1101-232 we found a strong frequency-dependency of the degree of polarization (with a ratio $Π_X/Π_O\simeq 5.2$). For RGB J0710+591, IXPE derived a 1$σ$ upper limit $Π_X<11.6\%$, comparable with the measured optical degree of polarization (average $Π_O\sim 12\%$). We discuss the results in the framework of current interpretations and, in particular, we report an improved version of the stratified shock model that is able to reproduce the observed data of both sources.2025-12-22T09:29:48Z11 pages, accepted for publication in A&AFabrizio TavecchioDawoon E. KimGabriel EmeryIoannis LiodakisIván AgudoPaolo CoppiGiampiero TagliaferriLaura Di GesuTullia SbarratoLucia BalloAlberto SciaccalugaSteven R. EhlertGiacomo BonnoliFrancisco José AceitunoCarolina CasadioVíctor CasanovaImmacolata DonnarummaJuan EscuderoDaniel MorcuendeJorge Otero-SantosAlfredo SotaVilppu PiirolaPouya M. KouchElina LindforsKari NilssonIoannis MyserlisMark GurwellGarrett KeatingRamprasad RaoEmmanouil AngelakisAlexander KrausRyo ImazawaMahito SasadaYasushi FukazawaKoji S. KawabataMakoto UemuraTsunefumi MizunoTatsuya NakaokaSumie TochiharaTakahiro AkaiHiroshi AkitayaRumen BachevAnton StrigachevPetra BenkeLena DebbrechtJulia EichFlorian EppelAndrea GokusSteven HämmerichJonas HeßdörferMatthias KadlerSanghyun KimDana KirchnerGeorgios Filippos ParaschosFlorian RöschWladislaw Schulgahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.23144v1The Persistent Radio Sources and Multi-wavelength Counterparts of Fast Radio Bursts in Massive Binary Systems2026-03-24T12:44:31ZFast radio bursts (FRBs) are millisecond-duration pulses originating from cosmological distances. Multi-wavelength counterparts associated with FRBs are important for unveiling their physical origins. Recent observations provide strong evidence that the sources of some active FRBs are residing in massive star binaries. In this paper, we study the electromagnetic counterparts of FRBs, including the persistent radio sources (PRSs) and the bow shock radiation from wind collisions for FRBs residing in magnetar - massive star binaries. We find that the PRSs with luminosity $10^{38}-10^{39}$ erg s$^{-1}$ can be generated by young magnetar wind nebulae (MWN). The age of magnetars is a few decades. The observed long-term variation of flux density for PRSs can be explained by the internal magnetic field decay of magnetars. The bow shock radiation can account for the less luminous PRS of FRB 20201124A. The multi-wavelength emission arising from synchrotron radiation and inverse-Compton scattering in the bow shock can be the electromagnetic counterpart of FRBs. The emission at keV, GeV and TeV bands from the binary model can be detected at the distances of $\sim10-100$ Mpc, $\sim 1-10$ Mpc and $\sim0.1$ Mpc by current instruments, respectively.2026-03-24T12:44:31Z35 pages, 12 figures, 2 tables, submitted to ApJZ. Y. ZhaoF. Y. WangZ. G. Daihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22100v2The full evolution of the type-C QPO in MAXI J1348-630 revealed by Insight-HXMT2026-03-24T11:43:38ZBased on abundant data from Insight-HXMT, we conducted a detailed analysis of type-C quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) in the black hole X-ray binary MAXI J1348-630. Type-C QPOs were intensively detected over a broad energy band, with frequencies ranging from 0.24 to 10.3 Hz, and several new evolutionary features were identified. First, although type-C QPOs reappear intermittently, they show a stable characteristic frequency around 7 Hz. This implies a characteristic spatial scale for the QPO emission region, despite large variations in outburst intensity. Second, from the hard state to the hard-intermediate state, type-C QPOs display a harder fractional rms spectrum, with the rms peak shifting toward high energies (>20 keV) and an amplitude exceeding 10 %. This hard rms spectrum favors a high-energy origin for type-C QPOs. The spectral hardening occurs simultaneously with the weakening of the compact jet, suggesting a physical connection between these two processes. Finally, we observed hysteresis in the QPO frequency-flux relation, with the hysteresis loop evolving in opposite directions between the main and mini-outbursts. This offers a new perspective on the physical differences between the two outburst types, which may arise from variations in initial magnetic field conditions.2026-03-23T15:31:45Z9 pages, 6 figures. Accepted for publication in Astronomy & AstrophysicsX. -L. WangZ. YanF. -G. XieJ. -F. WangY. -X. LiZ. -Y. LiuR. -Y. Mahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20904v2It's always the quiet ones: Single Degenerate Double Detonation Type Ia Supernova from Quiescent Helium Accretion2026-03-24T11:42:12ZWe investigate a sub-Chandrasekhar mass double detonation pathway for Type Ia supernovae arising from single degenerate helium accreting carbon-oxygen white dwarfs. Building on our previous one dimensional study of recurrent helium novae (Hillman et al. 2025), we evolve a 0.7 solar mass white dwarf through steady accretion at 10^-8 Msun yr^-1 until it reaches 1.1 solar mass, yielding realistic, time evolved helium rich profiles. These profiles are mapped into FLASH simulations, incorporating nuclear burning for helium and carbon-oxygen detonation, in multi-dimensional hydrodynamic runs. A localized, modest temperature perturbation near the base of the helium shell robustly triggers an outward helium-shell detonation. The ensuing inward propagating shock converges in the carbon-oxygen core, igniting a secondary detonation that unbinds the star. We obtain a Ni56 yield of ~0.64 solar mass, an intermediate-mass element (Si-Ca) mass of ~0.41 solar mass, and maximum ejecta velocities approaching 22,000 km/s, values consistent with normal Type Ia supernovae. Our results demonstrate that recurrent helium accretors, typically quiescent over long timescales, can evolve under subtle, "quiet" conditions to trigger robust double detonations, supporting their role as viable progenitors of sub-Chandrasekhar mass Type Ia supernovae.2025-10-23T18:01:14Z15 pages, 4 figures, 1 tableAmir MichaelisYael HillmanHagai B. Peretshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13403v2Evidence for Neutrino Emission from X-Ray-bright Active Galactic Nuclei with IceCube2026-03-24T10:01:34ZRecently, IceCube reported neutrino emission from the Seyfert galaxy NGC 1068. Using 13.1 years of IceCube data, we present a follow-up search for neutrino sources in the northern sky. NGC 1068 remains the most significant neutrino source among 110 preselected gamma-ray emitters while also being spatially compatible with the most significant location in the northern sky. Its energy spectrum is characterized by an unbroken power-law with spectral index $γ= 3.4 \pm 0.2$. Consistent with previous results, the observed neutrino flux exceeds its gamma-ray counterpart by at least two orders of magnitude. Motivated by this disparity and the high X-ray luminosity of the source, we selected 47 X-ray bright Seyfert galaxies from the Swift/BAT spectroscopic survey that were not included in the list of gamma-ray emitters. When testing this collection for neutrino emission, we observe a 3.3$σ$ excess from an ensemble of 11 sources, with NGC 1068 excluded from the sample. Our results strengthen the evidence that X-ray bright cores of active galactic nuclei are neutrino emitters.2025-10-15T10:58:49Z25 pages, 15 figures, 3 tablesApJL 1000 L26 (2026)R. AbbasiM. AckermannJ. AdamsS. K. AgarwallaJ. A. AguilarM. AhlersJ. M. AlameddineS. AliN. M. AminK. AndeenC. ArgüellesY. AshidaS. AthanasiadouS. N. AxaniR. BabuX. BaiJ. Baines-HolmesA. Balagopal V.S. W. BarwickS. BashV. BasuR. BayJ. J. BeattyJ. Becker TjusP. BehrensJ. BeiseC. BellenghiB. BenkelS. BenZviD. BerleyE. BernardiniD. Z. BessonE. BlaufussL. BloomS. BlotI. BodoF. BontempoJ. Y. Book MotzkinC. Boscolo MeneguoloS. BöserO. BotnerJ. BöttcherJ. BraunB. BrinsonZ. Brisson-TsavoussisR. T. BurleyD. ButterfieldM. A. CampanaK. CarloniJ. CarpioS. ChattopadhyayN. ChauZ. ChenD. ChirkinS. ChoiB. A. ClarkA. ColemanP. ColemanG. H. CollinD. A. Coloma BorjaA. ConnollyJ. M. ConradD. F. CowenC. De ClercqJ. J. DeLaunayD. DelgadoT. DelmeulleS. DengP. DesiatiK. D. de VriesG. de WasseigeT. DeYoungJ. C. Díaz-VélezS. DiKerbyT. DingM. DittmerA. DomiL. DraperL. DueserD. DurnfordK. DuttaM. A. DuVernoisT. EhrhardtL. EidenschinkA. EimerP. EllerE. EllingerD. ElsässerR. EngelH. ErpenbeckW. EsmailS. EuligJ. EvansP. A. EvensonK. L. FanK. FangK. FarragA. R. FazelyA. FedynitchN. FeiglC. FinleyL. FischerD. FoxA. FranckowiakS. FukamiP. FürstJ. GallagherE. GansterA. GarciaM. GarciaG. GargE. GentonL. GerhardtA. GhadimiT. GlüsenkampJ. G. GonzalezS. GoswamiA. GranadosD. GrantS. J. GrayS. GriffinS. GriswoldK. M. GrothD. GuevelC. GüntherP. GutjahrC. HaC. HaackA. HallgrenL. HalveF. HalzenL. HamacherM. Ha MinhM. HandtK. HansonJ. HardinA. A. HarnischP. HatchA. HaungsJ. HäußlerK. HelbingJ. HellrungB. HenkeL. HennigF. HenningsenL. HeuermannR. HewettN. HeyerS. HickfordA. HidvegiC. HillG. C. HillR. HmaidK. D. HoffmanD. HooperS. HoriK. HoshinaM. HostertW. HouM. HrywniakT. HuberK. HultqvistK. HymonA. IshiharaW. IwakiriM. JacquartS. JainO. JanikM. JanssonM. JeongM. JinN. KampD. KangW. KangX. KangA. KappesL. KardumT. KargM. KarlA. KarleA. KatilM. KauerJ. L. KelleyM. KhanalA. Khatee ZathulA. KheirandishH. KimkuJ. KirylukC. KleinS. R. KleinY. KobayashiA. KochockiR. KoiralaH. KolanoskiT. KontrimasL. KöpkeC. KopperD. J. KoskinenP. KoundalM. KowalskiT. KozynetsA. KravkaN. KriegerJ. KrishnamoorthiT. KrishnanK. KruiswijkE. KrupczakA. KumarE. KunN. KurahashiN. LadC. Lagunas GualdaL. Lallement ArnaudM. LamoureuxM. J. LarsonF. LauberJ. P. LazarK. Leonard DeHoltonA. LeszczyńskaJ. LiaoC. LinQ. R. LiuY. T. LiuM. LiubarskaC. LoveL. LuF. LucarelliW. LuszczakY. LyuM. MacdonaldJ. MadsenE. MagnusY. MakinoE. ManaoS. MancinaA. MandI. C. MarişS. MarkaZ. MarkaL. MartenI. Martinez-SolerR. MaruyamaJ. MauroF. MayhewF. McNallyJ. V. MeadK. MeagherS. MechbalA. MedinaM. MeierY. MerckxL. MertenJ. MitchellL. MolchanyS. MondalT. MontaruliR. W. MooreY. MoriiA. MosbruggerM. MoulaiD. MousadiE. MoyauxT. MukherjeeR. NaabM. NakosU. NaumannJ. NeckerL. NesteM. NeumannH. NiederhausenM. U. NisaK. NodaA. NoellA. NovikovA. ObertackeV. O'DellA. OlivasR. OrsoeJ. OsbornE. O'SullivanV. PalusovaH. PandyaA. ParentiN. ParkV. ParrishE. N. PaudelL. PaulC. Pérez de los HerosT. PerniceT. C. PetersenJ. PetersonM. PlumA. PonténV. PoojyamY. PopovychM. Prado RodriguezB. PriesR. Procter-MurphyG. T. PrzybylskiL. PyrasC. RaabJ. Rack-HelleisN. RadM. RavnK. RawlinsZ. RechavA. RehmanI. ReistrofferE. ResconiS. ReuschC. D. RhoW. RhodeL. RiccaB. RiedelA. RifaieE. J. RobertsM. RongenA. RostedC. RottT. RuheL. RuohanD. RyckboschJ. SafferD. Salazar-GallegosP. SampathkumarA. SandrockG. Sanger-JohnsonM. SantanderS. SarkarJ. SavelbergM. ScarneraP. SchaileM. SchaufelH. SchielerS. SchindlerL. SchlickmannB. SchlüterF. SchlüterN. SchmeisserT. SchmidtF. G. SchröderL. SchumacherS. SchwirnS. SclafaniD. SeckelL. SeenM. SeikhS. SeunarineP. A. Sevle MyhrR. ShahS. ShefaliN. ShimizuB. SkrzypekR. SnihurJ. SoedingreksoA. SøgaardD. SoldinP. SoldinG. SommaniC. SpannfellnerG. M. SpiczakC. SpieringJ. StachurskaM. StamatikosT. StanevT. StezelbergerT. StürwaldT. StuttardG. W. SullivanI. TaboadaS. Ter-AntonyanA. TerliukA. ThakuriM. ThiesmeyerW. G. ThompsonJ. ThwaitesS. TilavK. TollefsonS. ToscanoD. TosiA. TrettinA. K. UpadhyayK. UpshawA. VaidyanathanN. Valtonen-MattilaJ. ValverdeJ. VandenbrouckeT. Van EedenN. van EijndhovenL. Van RootselaarJ. van SantenJ. VaraF. VarsiM. VenugopalM. VereeckenS. Vergara CarrascoS. VerpoestD. VeskeA. VijaiJ. VillarrealC. WalckA. WangE. H. S. WarrickC. WeaverP. WeigelA. WeindlJ. WeldertA. Y. WenC. WendtJ. WerthebachM. WeyrauchN. WhitehornC. H. WiebuschD. R. WilliamsL. WitthausM. WolfG. WredeX. W. XuJ. P. YanezY. YaoE. YildizciS. YoshidaR. YoungF. YuS. YuT. YuanA. Zander JurowitzkiA. ZegarelliS. ZhangZ. ZhangP. ZhelninP. Zilberman10.3847/2041-8213/ae4aadhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07952v2Spin-Orbit Misalignments of Eccentric Black Hole Mergers in AGN Disks2026-03-24T09:20:09ZThe disks of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) provide a natural environment where stellar-mass black holes (BHs) can dynamically pair, undergo repeated interactions, and eventually merge. It is commonly assumed that gas accretion will both efficiently spin up disk-embedded black holes and align the orbits of embedded binaries with the disk plane, leading to mergers with preferentially positive effective spin parameters ($χ_{\mathrm{eff}}$). Such predictions have motivated the use of $χ_{\mathrm{eff}}$ as a diagnostic for identifying candidate AGN-embedded mergers in the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA gravitational-wave catalog. In this work, we perform post-Newtonian $N$-body simulations of nearly planar binary-single encounters and apply an empirically motivated, gas-driven alignment prescription to characterize the expected $χ_{\mathrm{eff}}$-eccentricity correlations of AGN-embedded mergers. By comparing the alignment and gravitational-wave inspiral timescales, we identify the regions of parameter space, across both disk location and binary properties, where full disk-spin-orbit alignment is effective and where it is not. We find that quasi-circular binaries typically align by the time they merge, supporting the standard picture of spin-orbit aligned orientations. By contrast, eccentric binaries (with in-band eccentricity $e_{10\mathrm{Hz}}\gtrsim 0.1$) typically inspiral too quickly for gas torques to act, preserving the post-encounter spin-orbit misalignments and yielding more isotropic $χ_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distributions when disk densities and torque efficiencies are modest. This interplay naturally establishes a correlation between binary eccentricity and $χ_{\mathrm{eff}}$ in AGN disks, highlighting a new key observable of the AGN channel and a potential explanation for massive events such as GW190521 and GW231123.2025-10-09T08:47:52ZGaia FabjChristopher TiedeConnar RowanMartin PessahJohan Samsinghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11799v2Eruptive mass loss less than a year before the explosion of superluminous supernovae. II. A systematic search for pre-explosion eruptions with VLT/X-shooter2026-03-24T09:07:51ZWe present X-shooter observations of a sample of 21 hydrogen-poor superluminous supernovae (SLSNe-I), spanning a redshift range of z=0.13-0.95, aimed at searching for shells of circumstellar material (CSM). Specifically, we focus on identifying broad Mg II absorption features that are blueshifted by several thousand kilometers per second and have previously been interpreted as arising from resonance line scattering of the SLSN continuum by rapidly expanding CSM ejected shortly before explosion. Utilizing high-quality spectra, we model the region around 2800A to characterize the Mg II line profiles, enabling us to either confirm their presence or place constraints on undetected CSM shells. We identify five objects in our sample that show broad Mg II absorption features consistent with the presence of CSM. While SN2018ibb, SN2020xga and SN2022xgc have been previously reported, we identify previously undiscovered CSM shells in DES15S2nr and DES16C3ggu. These shells were likely expelled approximately two and three months, respectively, before the explosion of their associated SNe, timescales consistent with late-stage mass-loss episodes. We do not find any correlations between the shell properties and the SN properties, except for a marginal correlation between the light curve decline time scale and the shell velocities. We further demonstrate that CSM configurations similar to the majority of the detected shells would have been observable in spectra with signal-to-noise >8 per resolution element, and that the lines from a shell are in general detectable except in the cases where the shell is either very geometrically and/or optically thin. Therefore, we conclude that the detection of CSM shells is not a selection effect, but may instead point to the existence of a subclass of SLSNe-I undergoing late-stage shell ejections shortly before explosion.2025-10-13T18:01:03Z16 pages, 9 + 12 figures. Published at A&A on 19 March 2026A&A 707, A338 (2026)A. GkiniC. FranssonR. LunnanS. SchulzeJ. Sollerman K. TsalapatasN. SarinM. NichollC. AngusU. BurgazS. J. BrennanT. -W. ChenA. Gal-YamA. GangopadhyayY. HuM. M. KasliwalR. R. LaherP. J. PessiB. RusholmeE. RusseilA. SinghC. SkoglundR. SmithB. van BaalS. L. WestL. Yan10.1051/0004-6361/202557673http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22955v1MAGIC observations of NGC 4278. The first low-luminosity radio galaxy with compact jets detected at TeV energies2026-03-24T08:54:25ZThe Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHAASO) Collaboration has recently reported the first detection at TeV energies of a low-luminosity radio galaxy, NGC 4278. The aim of this work is to investigate the high-energy properties of NGC 4278 during the flaring and subsequent quasi-quiescent states with the Florian Goebel Major Atmospheric Gamma Imaging Cherenkov (MAGIC) telescopes. NGC 4278 is located in the field of view of two blazars, 1ES 1215+303 and 1ES 1218+304, previously observed by the MAGIC telescopes. Therefore, we re-analyzed MAGIC observations made between 2010 and 2024 on these sources. We also modeled the broadband spectral energy distribution of the source during and after the flaring state at TeV energies. We did not detect any statistically significant $γ$-ray emission from NGC 4278 with MAGIC. The corresponding upper limits obtained using the entire MAGIC dataset ($F_{{\rm UL, }\, >150\, \mathrm{GeV}}=1.5 \times 10^{-12}\, \mathrm{ph \, s^{-1}\, cm^{-2}}$) are consistent with the LHAASO results. The best-fit models obtained for both emission states suggest that the emitting region is strongly particle-dominated, and an efficient acceleration mechanism has to be in action in order to reach TeV energies. The transition between the flaring and quasi-quiescent state cannot be explained by a simple radiative cooling of the emitting particles. The inferred jet power, of the order of $L_{\rm jet}\sim 10^{42}\, \mathrm{erg\,s^{-1}}$, is dominated by the kinetic component in both states and it is in a good agreement with previous, time-averaged observational estimates, supporting the idea that such high-energy flares might be recurrent. The jet, however, remains too weak to break the host-galaxy confinement.2026-03-24T08:54:25ZsubmittedS. AbeMAGIC CollaborationJ. AbhirMAGIC CollaborationV. A. AcciariMAGIC CollaborationA. Aguasca-CabotMAGIC CollaborationI. AgudoMAGIC CollaborationT. AnielloMAGIC CollaborationS. AnsoldiMAGIC CollaborationL. A. AntonelliMAGIC CollaborationA. Arbet EngelsMAGIC CollaborationC. ArcaroMAGIC CollaborationT. T. H. ArnesenMAGIC CollaborationA. BabićMAGIC CollaborationC. BakshiMAGIC CollaborationU. Barres de AlmeidaMAGIC CollaborationJ. A. BarrioMAGIC CollaborationL. Barrios-JiménezMAGIC CollaborationI. BatkovićMAGIC CollaborationJ. BaxterMAGIC CollaborationJ. Becerra GonzálezMAGIC CollaborationW. BednarekMAGIC CollaborationE. BernardiniMAGIC CollaborationJ. BerneteMAGIC CollaborationA. BertiMAGIC CollaborationJ. BesenriederMAGIC CollaborationC. BigongiariMAGIC CollaborationA. BilandMAGIC CollaborationO. BlanchMAGIC CollaborationG. BonnoliMAGIC CollaborationŽ. BošnjakMAGIC CollaborationE. BronziniMAGIC CollaborationI. BurelliMAGIC CollaborationA. Campoy-OrdazMAGIC CollaborationA. CarosiMAGIC CollaborationR. CarosiMAGIC CollaborationM. Carretero-CastrilloMAGIC CollaborationA. J. Castro-TiradoMAGIC CollaborationD. CerasoleMAGIC CollaborationG. CeribellaMAGIC CollaborationA. CerviñoMAGIC CollaborationA. ChilingarianMAGIC CollaborationA. Cifuentes SantosMAGIC CollaborationJ. L. ContrerasMAGIC CollaborationJ. CortinaMAGIC CollaborationS. CovinoMAGIC CollaborationF. D'AmmandoMAGIC CollaborationG. D'AmicoMAGIC CollaborationP. Da VelaMAGIC CollaborationF. DazziMAGIC CollaborationA. De AngelisMAGIC CollaborationB. De LottoMAGIC CollaborationR. de MenezesMAGIC CollaborationJ. DelgadoMAGIC CollaborationC. Delgado MendezMAGIC CollaborationF. Di PierroMAGIC CollaborationR. Di TriaMAGIC CollaborationL. Di VenereMAGIC CollaborationA. DineshMAGIC CollaborationD. Dominis PresterMAGIC CollaborationD. DornerMAGIC CollaborationM. DoroMAGIC CollaborationL. EisenbergerMAGIC CollaborationD. ElsaesserMAGIC CollaborationL. FariñaMAGIC CollaborationL. FoffanoMAGIC CollaborationL. FontMAGIC CollaborationS. FröseMAGIC CollaborationY. FukazawaMAGIC CollaborationR. J. García LópezMAGIC CollaborationS. García SotoMAGIC CollaborationS. GasparyanMAGIC CollaborationM. GaugMAGIC CollaborationJ. G. Giesbrecht PaivaMAGIC CollaborationN. GigliettoMAGIC CollaborationF. GiordanoMAGIC CollaborationP. GliwnyMAGIC CollaborationT. GradetzkeMAGIC CollaborationR. GrauMAGIC CollaborationJ. G. GreenMAGIC CollaborationP. GüntherMAGIC CollaborationD. HadaschMAGIC CollaborationA. HahnMAGIC CollaborationG. HarutyunyanMAGIC CollaborationT. HassanMAGIC CollaborationL. HeckmannMAGIC CollaborationJ. Herrera LlorenteMAGIC CollaborationD. HrupecMAGIC CollaborationD. IsrayelyanMAGIC CollaborationJ. JahanviMAGIC CollaborationI. Jiménez MartínezMAGIC CollaborationJ. Jiménez QuilesMAGIC CollaborationJ. JormanainenMAGIC CollaborationS. KankkunenMAGIC CollaborationT. KayanokiMAGIC CollaborationP. M. KouchMAGIC CollaborationG. KoziolMAGIC CollaborationH. KuboMAGIC CollaborationJ. KushidaMAGIC CollaborationM. LáinezMAGIC CollaborationA. LamastraMAGIC CollaborationE. LindforsMAGIC CollaborationS. LombardiMAGIC CollaborationF. LongoMAGIC CollaborationR. López-CotoMAGIC CollaborationM. López-MoyaMAGIC CollaborationA. López-OramasMAGIC CollaborationS. LoporchioMAGIC CollaborationL LulićMAGIC CollaborationP. MajumdarMAGIC CollaborationM. MakarievMAGIC CollaborationG. ManevaMAGIC CollaborationM. ManganaroMAGIC CollaborationS. ManganoMAGIC CollaborationS. MarchesiMAGIC CollaborationM. MariottiMAGIC CollaborationM. MartínezMAGIC CollaborationP. MaruševecMAGIC CollaborationD. MazinMAGIC CollaborationS. MenchiariMAGIC CollaborationJ. Méndez GallegoMAGIC CollaborationS. MenonMAGIC CollaborationD. MiceliMAGIC CollaborationR. MirzoyanMAGIC CollaborationM. Molero GonzálezMAGIC CollaborationE. MolinaMAGIC CollaborationH. A. MondalMAGIC CollaborationA. MoralejoMAGIC CollaborationC. NanciMAGIC CollaborationA. NegroMAGIC CollaborationV. NeustroevMAGIC CollaborationM. Nievas RosilloMAGIC CollaborationC. NigroMAGIC CollaborationL. NikolićMAGIC CollaborationK. NilssonMAGIC CollaborationS. NozakiMAGIC CollaborationA. OkumuraMAGIC CollaborationJ. Otero-SantosMAGIC CollaborationS. PaianoMAGIC CollaborationD. PanequeMAGIC CollaborationR. PaolettiMAGIC CollaborationJ. M. ParedesMAGIC CollaborationM. PeresanoMAGIC CollaborationM. PersicMAGIC CollaborationM. PihetMAGIC CollaborationG. PirolaMAGIC CollaborationF. PodobnikMAGIC CollaborationP. G. Prada MoroniMAGIC CollaborationE. PrandiniMAGIC CollaborationW. RhodeMAGIC CollaborationM. RibóMAGIC CollaborationJ. RicoMAGIC CollaborationA. RoyMAGIC CollaborationN. SahakyanMAGIC CollaborationF. G. SaturniMAGIC CollaborationK. SchmitzMAGIC CollaborationF. SchmuckermaierMAGIC CollaborationT. SchweizerMAGIC CollaborationA. SciaccalugaMAGIC CollaborationG. SilvestriMAGIC CollaborationA. SimonginiMAGIC CollaborationJ. SitarekMAGIC CollaborationD. SobczynskaMAGIC CollaborationA. StamerraMAGIC CollaborationJ. StriškovićMAGIC CollaborationD. StromMAGIC CollaborationM. StrzysMAGIC CollaborationY. SudaMAGIC CollaborationH. TajimaMAGIC CollaborationM. TakahashiMAGIC CollaborationR. TakeishiMAGIC CollaborationJ. Tartera BarberàMAGIC CollaborationP. TemnikovMAGIC CollaborationT. TerzićMAGIC CollaborationA. TutoneMAGIC CollaborationS. UbachMAGIC CollaborationJ. van ScherpenbergMAGIC CollaborationM. Vazquez AcostaMAGIC CollaborationS. VenturaMAGIC CollaborationG. VernaMAGIC CollaborationI. VialeMAGIC CollaborationA. ViglianoMAGIC CollaborationC. F. VigoritoMAGIC CollaborationE. VisentinMAGIC CollaborationV. VitaleMAGIC CollaborationI. VovkMAGIC CollaborationR. WalterMAGIC CollaborationC. WaltherMAGIC CollaborationF. WersigMAGIC CollaborationM. WillMAGIC CollaborationP. K. H. YeungMAGIC CollaborationE. TorresiG. MiglioriP. Grandihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.18385v2Detection prospects of solar $g$-modes with LISA2026-03-24T08:43:25ZThe possibility of detecting solar oscillation modes using space-based gravitational-wave detectors has been investigated in the context of gravitational-wave interferometry, with Polnarev \cite{Polnarev:2009xf} demonstrating that low-frequency solar modes could, in principle, produce detectable signals in a LISA-type interferometer. Motivated by this work, I revisit the problem using current solar models, updated detector sensitivities, and improved theoretical and observational constraints on mode amplitudes. In this study, I compute the gravitational response of solar oscillation modes using standard solar models generated with \texttt{MESA}, and mode eigenfrequencies and eigenfunctions calculated with \texttt{GYRE}. I focus primarily on solar $g$ modes, evaluating their responses for degree $l=2$ and azimuthal orders $m=0$ and $m=2$. The analysis incorporates both the earlier proposed and the current updated LISA sensitivity curves, and I perform a comparative assessment with the TianQin mission in the relevant low-frequency band. To assess the robustness of the predicted signals, I estimate the gravitational responses using two different standard solar models based on the GS98 and AGSS09 abundance compilations. I find that the resulting signal responses are nearly identical for the two models, indicating that uncertainties in solar metallicity have a negligible impact on the detectability of solar $g$ modes by space-based interferometers.2026-02-20T17:47:08Z16 pages, 6 figures, 2 tablesAman Awasthihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22938v1Orbital motion detected in gamma Cas Fe K emission lines2026-03-24T08:34:12ZA subset of Be stars, typified by the naked-eye star gamma Cas, exhibits unusually bright and hard X-ray emission, the origin of which has remained debated for five decades. We performed high-resolution X-ray spectroscopic monitoring of gamma Cas with the Resolve instrument aboard the X-Ray Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission (XRISM). X-ray lines from the ultra-hot plasma and fluorescence from cooler material exhibit Doppler shifts consistent with orbital motion, not of the Be star itself, but of its low-mass companion (previously shown to be a white dwarf). This first evidence of orbital motion for the hard X-ray emitting plasma uniquely links it to the scenario of accretion onto the white dwarf companion. The modest line broadening further indicates that fluorescence occurs on the white dwarf surface and excludes X-ray generation in the inner parts of an accretion disc. Our findings identify gamma Cas and its analogues as the previously elusive, but long predicted class of binaries composed of a Be and a white dwarf. Identifying the origin of the hard X-rays from gamma Cas and its analogues, which represent about 10% of early-type Be stars, provides a key input for population synthesis models of massive binary evolution.2026-03-24T08:34:12Zaccepted by A&AYael NazeFNRS/ULiegeMasahiro TsujimotoISAS-JAXA, Univ. of TokyoGregor RauwULiegeSean J. GundersonMIThttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16652v2Anomalous Dynamical Screening of Relativistic Plasma in a Magnetic Field2026-03-24T08:16:06ZWe study collective excitations in a relativistic collisionless plasma composed of massless fermions subject to an external magnetic field. We include dynamical electromagnetism and fluctuations of the chiral charge, while maintaining a vanishing net chiral charge. Within the framework of chiral kinetic theory, we find that the chiral anomaly gives a correction to the transverse photon self-energy and that a novel type of dynamical screening can emerge. In the strong magnetic field limit, we also show that the collective mode has a gap using the lowest Landau level approximation. We further discuss implications of the anomalous dynamical screening for neutron star phenomenology.2025-09-20T11:57:21Z17 pages; v2: published versionPTEP 2026, 033B04 (2026)Sota Hanai10.1093/ptep/ptag023http://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03716v2The broad-lined type Ic supernova 2020lao experienced an energetic explosion with no central-engine signatures2026-03-24T07:53:02ZWe present infant-phase observations of the SN Ic-BL 2020lao, including optical spectroscopy beginning 48 hrs after explosion. The explosion time was constrained by power-law fits to the rising TESS and ZTF light curves, with the first ZTF detection occurring 27 hrs after explosion. The optical light curves show a rapid rise lasting 8.8 days and a peak luminosity typical of SNe Ic-BL (Mr=-18.5 mag). Unlike some engine-driven SN Ic-BL events, the light curve of SN 2020lao shows no evidence of an optical afterglow or excess emission, and the absence of shock-cooling in the TESS and ZTF data constrains the progenitor to a Wolf-Rayet-like star with radius less than a few times the solar radius, ruling out any extended envelope. The spectra resemble those of the X-ray-flash-associated SN 2006aj but with higher expansion velocities. From Arnett-type fits to the bolometric light curve and measured FeII velocities, we infer a Ni mass of 0.2 solar masses, an ejecta mass of 3.2 solar masses, and a kinetic energy of about 23x10^51 erg, corresponding to a specific kinetic energy of 7x10^51 erg per solar mass. Spectral synthesis modeling broadly reproduces the photospheric spectra of SN 2020lao and suggests a specific kinetic energy of 5x10^51 erg per solar mass. SN 2020lao and SN 2006aj synthesized comparable amounts of Ni, yet SN 2020lao exhibits specific kinetic energy values 5-10 times larger. VLA and Swift/XRT non-detections reveal no afterglow emission, allowing limits on relativistic ejecta and dense circumstellar material. Given that SN 2020lao reaches a specific kinetic energy typical of engine-driven SNe Ic-BL, the lack of an optical excess with the non-detections in the radio and X-ray bands suggests that if a relativistic jet was launched, it was either viewed far off axis or choked before breakout. If there was no relativistic jet, SN 2020lao would be an extreme nonrelativistic SN Ic-BL.2025-12-03T12:05:51Z14 pages, 10 figures, several tables. Revised version. Referee comments addressed. Abridged abstractM. D. StritzingerAarhusT. J. MoriyaS. BoseP. A. MazzaliP. LundqvistE. KaramehmetogluL. S. ArndtC. AshallL. GalbanyW. B. HoogendamE. BaronJ. M. DerKacyN. Elias-RosaE. Y. HsiaoP. HöflichE. PianE. A. M. JensenS. MoranA. PastorelloM. ShahbandehG. Valerin10.1051/0004-6361/202558378http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06741v2Diagnosing the Properties and Evolutionary Fates of Black Hole and Wolf-Rayet X-ray Binaries as Potential Gravitational Wave Sources for the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA Network2026-03-24T06:52:02ZIC 10 X-1, NGC 300 X-1, and Cyg X-3 constitute a unique class of X-ray binaries in which a stellar-mass black hole (BH) accretes material from a Wolf-Rayet (WR). These systems are particularly intriguing because of their short orbital periods, which make them promising progenitors of gravitational-wave (GW) sources detectable by the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) network. Adopting a revised accretion efficiency within the standard Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton framework, we perform detailed binary evolution calculations using \texttt{MESA} to characterize their properties at different evolutionary stages and to assess their ultimate fates as potential LVK-detectable GW sources. By applying additional constraints from the observed properties of IC 10 X-1 and NGC 300 X-1, we find that the upper limits on the BH masses in these systems ($M_{\rm BH} \lesssim 25\, M_\odot$ for IC 10 X-1 and $M_{\rm BH} \lesssim 15\, M_\odot$ for NGC 300 X-1) are significantly lower than previous estimates. Both systems are expected to form binary black holes (BBHs) that will merge within a Hubble time, except in the case where the BH in NGC 300 X-1 has a mass of $9\,M_\odot$, corresponding to the lower limit inferred in a previous study using the continuum-fitting method with a relativistic slim-disc model. For Cyg X-3, we find that the BH spin magnitude is constrained to be $\lesssim$ 0.6. Moreover, the WR star in Cyg X-3 is likely to form a lower-mass-gap BH, and the resulting BBH system is also expected to merge within a Hubble time.2025-10-08T07:54:42ZAccepted for publication in MNRAS after minor revisionZi-Yuan WangYing QinGeorges MeynetQing-Zhong LiuXin-Wen ShuYa-Wen XueLiang YuanJun-Qian LiKun JiaHan-Feng Songhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.22776v2Prospects for Observing the Microquasar SS 433 with the LACT Array2026-03-24T06:14:43ZWe investigate the observational capabilities of the upcoming LACT Cherenkov telescope array for the microquasar SS 433 through detailed simulations. Our results indicate that a detection significance of 5 sigma can be achieved with approximately 30 hours of observation. This exposure, coupled with LACT's excellent angular resolution, enables the spatial separation of the eastern and western jets. Furthermore, based on the LHAASO spectral and morphological findings, the array is expected to distinguish the central hadronic component after roughly 100 hours of observation. We also examine its ability to differentiate between the H.E.S.S. and LHAASO spectral models. These findings demonstrate LACT's strong potential to provide critical insights into particle acceleration in PeVatrons and the radiation mechanisms of microquasars.2025-10-26T18:01:12Z7 pages, 7 figuresZhen XieZhipeng ZhangRuizhi Yanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.22720v1SGR 1935+2154's Quiet Local Environment: Clues for Its Progenitor2026-03-24T02:35:07ZMagnetars are highly magnetized neutron stars (NSs) whose evolution and radiation are governed by the decay and/or reconfiguration of their magnetic fields. The origin of magnetars remains an open question, with proposed progenitor scenarios including core-collapse (CC) of very massive stars ($\ge 25~M_\odot$) or non-very massive stars ($8<M_*<25~M_\odot$), mergers of stellar systems, and accretion-induced collapse (AIC) of white dwarfs (WDs). Investigating the environments of magnetars can offer valuable clues to this issue. In this work, we study the local (a radius of $0.87^\circ$, $\sim 100$ pc at 6.6 kpc) stellar environment of SGR 1935+2154, which is spatially associated with the supernova remnant (SNR) G57.2+0.8, based on astrometry from Gaia DR3 and multi-band photometry from optical to infrared (IR). We discover that the upper limit of the surface density of massive stars around SGR 1935+2154 is only a quarter of that of the solar neighborhood, where the star formation rate is modest in the Galaxy. This quiet environment implies that the magnetar was likely formed by the CC of either a non-very massive star or a binary merger product rather than the CC of a very massive star. Although alternative channels cannot be excluded, their probabilities may be substantially lower. The studies of magnetars associated with SNRs consistently favor non-very massive progenitors, implying that such progenitors may produce a considerable fraction of magnetars. We also backtrack the trajectories of SGR 1935+2154 and its surrounding stars to search for its potential massive companions, yet no such companions are found.2026-03-24T02:35:07ZAccepted for publication in ApJWenlang HePing ZhouBingqiu Chen