https://arxiv.org/api/DcjoUE//DoZfoaeWrXkba4YC7wM2026-04-05T13:30:24Z6804518015http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.26112v1The muon charge asymmetry and the directional distribution of thunderstorm events observed by the GRAPES-3 muon telescope2026-03-27T06:54:20ZThe electric fields inside thunderstorms can significantly modify the intensity of secondary cosmic ray muons at the ground level, producing measurable variations in their intensity ($Δ$I$_μ$). By utilizing the decade-long observations of thunderstorms (April 2011-December 2020) by the GRAPES-3 muon telescope (G3MT), a directional asymmetry in $Δ$I$_μ$ is observed, with nearly six times more events being detected from the east than the west directions. Using detailed CORSIKA Monte Carlo simulations, it is shown that this asymmetry is caused by the variations of the muon charge ratio R$_μ$ (N$_{μ^+}$/N$_{μ^-}$). The anisotropic R$_μ$ in turn, is caused by the systematic changes in geomagnetic cutoff rigidities, and subsequent selective filtering of predominantly positively charged primary cosmic rays. As a consequence, the R$_μ$ increases systematically from west to east across the G3MT field of view, enhancing the sensitivity of east directions to positively charged thunderstorm top. Monte Carlo simulations with constant R$_μ$ show that the directional asymmetry disappears, demonstrating the muon charge imbalance to be the dominant driver of the observed asymmetry. The dependence of R$_μ$ on the hadronic interaction is also studied by comparing seven combinations high-, and low-energy hadronic interaction generators, which show a $\lesssim$7% spread in R$_μ$, and $\lesssim$14% variation in the derived thunderstorm potentials. These results provide the first quantitative link between the muon charge asymmetry caused by the geomagnetic field, and the directional distribution of thunderstorms, reinforcing the role of muon observations as a probe of gigavolt potentials in atmospheric electrical structures.2026-03-27T06:54:20ZB. HariharanS. K. GuptaY. HayashiP. JagadeesanA. JainS. KawakamiH. KojimaP. K. MohantyY. MurakiP. K. NayakA. OshimaM. RameezK. RameshL. V. ReddyS. Shibatahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2512.03484v2Motion of a charged test particle around a static black hole in a monopole magnetic field2026-03-27T05:58:22ZWe study the motion of a charged test particle in the spacetime with a spherically symmetric black hole which is immersed in a monopole magnetic field. We show that the radial motion of the charged test particle is governed by completely the same equation as that in the case of no magnetic field. This result implies that the black hole will acquire the electric charge if it is surrounded by the collisionless plasma composed of protons and electrons which obey the Maxwell velocity distribution. The drastically different situation appears in the tangential motions of charged test particles due to the magnetic field. The trajectory of a charged test particle in the black hole with the magnetic field of the order of 10 Gauss near the black hole, is confined on a very thin cone as long as the specific angular momentum of the particle is not much larger than the gravitational radius of the black hole times the speed of light. This result leads to a possibility that a plasma lump can hover over the black hole and is very hot, in the monopole magnetic field.2025-12-03T06:26:23Z30 pages, 4 figures. In this version, several typos and incorrect equations have been correctedKen-ichi NakaoYota EndoHideki IshiharaKenta MatsuoKensuke SuetoKoudai UedaHirotaka Yoshinohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.14363v2Is GW231123 a hierarchical merger?2026-03-27T01:45:13ZThe binary black hole merger GW231123 is both the most massive gravitational-wave event observed and has the highest component spins measured to date. The dimensionless spins of the more massive (primary) and less massive (secondary) black holes are measured to be $χ_1 = 0.90^{+0.10}_{-0.19}$ and $χ_2 = 0.80^{+0.20}_{-0.51}$ ($90\%$ credible intervals), respectively. Its large mass and extremal spins are challenging to explain through standard binary stellar physics, though a flurry of hypothetical scenarios have been proposed. Hierarchical assembly - i.e., mergers of black holes that are themselves formed from previous generations of mergers - is generally a promising way to explain massive and rapidly spinning black holes. Here, we investigate the possibility that GW231123 was assembled hierarchically in a dense star cluster as the merger of two second-generation black holes. Taking the inferred spin values at face value, we find that it is possible ($p\approx 5\%$) that a compact binary with component spins like GW231123 could form in a cluster from hierarchical assembly.2025-10-16T06:58:59Z9 pages, 2 figuresLachlan PassengerSharan BanagiriEric ThranePaul D. LaskyAngela BorchersMaya FishbachClaire S. Yehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25949v1General-relativistic radiative cooling in neutron star magnetospheres2026-03-26T22:43:41ZRadiation reaction cooling plays an important role in describing the extreme plasma conditions found in the magnetospheres of astrophysical compact objects. Strong electromagnetic fields, characteristic of these environments, can trigger the development of anisotropic ring-shaped plasma distributions with inverted Landau populations in momentum space. In this work, we present the first systematic investigation of this mechanism in realistic astrophysical configurations, by accounting for how non-uniform electromagnetic field geometries and general-relativistic effects modify the phase-space dynamics of radiatively cooled plasmas. We demonstrate analytically that drift velocities favour the formation of spiral-shaped momentum distributions that still display inverted Landau populations, and estimate the minimum and maximum plasma injection distances required for inverted momentum distributions to be able to power the emission of coherent radiation through kinetic instabilities. From numerical simulations, we conclude that curved spacetime increases the gradient of the distribution function responsible for the development of kinetic instabilities, and prolongs the persistence of the inverted momentum structure relative to flat spacetime, confirming that realistic astrophysical conditions preserve and enhance the conditions necessary for synchrotron-powered emission of coherent radiation to occur.2026-03-26T22:43:41Z11 pages, 5 figuresJoão JoaquimFrancisco AssunçãoPablo J. BilbaoLuis O. Silvahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25938v1Narrowband searches for continuous gravitational waves from known pulsars in the first two parts of the fourth LIGO--Virgo--KAGRA observing run2026-03-26T22:06:08ZRotating non-axisymmetric neutron stars (NSs) are promising sources for continuous gravitational waves (CWs). Such CWs can, if detected, inform us about the internal structure and equation of state of NSs. Here, we present a narrowband search for CWs from known pulsars, for which an efficient and sensitive matched-filter search can be applied. Narrowband searches are designed to be robust to mismatches between the electromagnetic (EM) and gravitational emissions, in contrast to fully targeted searches where the CW emission is assumed to be phase-locked to the EM one. In this work, we search for the CW counterparts emitted by 34 pulsars using data from the first and second parts of the fourth LIGO--Virgo--KAGRA observing run. This is the largest number of pulsars so far targeted for narrowband searches in the advanced detector era. We use the 5n-vector narrowband pipeline, which applies frequency-domain matched filtering. In previous searches, it covered a narrow range in the frequency -- frequency time derivative ($f$ -- $\dot{f}$) space. Here, we also explore a range in the second time derivative of the frequency $\ddot{f}$ around the value indicated by EM observations. Additionally, for the first time, we target sources in a binary system with this kind of search. We find no evidence for CWs and therefore set upper limits on the strain amplitude emitted by each pulsar, using simulated signals added in real data. For 20 analyses, we report an upper limit below the theoretical spin-down limit. The tightest constraint is for pulsar PSR J0534+2200 (the Crab pulsar), for which our strain upper limit on the CW amplitude is $\lesssim 2\%$ of its spin-down limit, corresponding to less than $0.04\%$ of the spin-down power being radiated in the CW channel.2026-03-26T22:06:08Z30 pages, 6 figures, submitted to ApJ The LIGO Scientific Collaboration the Virgo Collaboration the KAGRA CollaborationA. G. AbacI. AbouelfettouhF. AcerneseK. AckleyA. AdamC. AdamcewiczS. AdhicaryD. AdhikariN. AdhikariR. X. AdhikariV. K. AdkinsS. AfrozA. AgapitoD. AgarwalM. AgathosN. AggarwalS. AggarwalO. D. AguiarI. -L. AhrendL. AielloA. AinP. AjithT. AkutsuS. AlbanesiL. AlbersW. AliS. Al-KershiC. AllénéA. AlloccaS. Al-ShammariP. A. AltinS. Alvarez-LopezW. AmarO. AmarasingheA. AmatoF. AmicucciC. AmraC. AnandA. AnanyevaS. B. AndersonW. G. AndersonM. AndiaM. AndoM. Andrés-CarcasonaJ. L. AndreyT. AndrićJ. AnglinJ. AnnaS. AnsoldiJ. M. AntelisS. AntierM. AoumiE. Z. AppavuravtherS. AppertS. K. AppleK. AraiA. ArayaM. C. ArayaM. Arca SeddaF. ArcipreteJ. S. AreedaN. AritomiF. ArmatoS. ArmstrongN. ArnaudM. ArogetiS. M. AronsonG. AshtonY. AsoL. AspreaM. AssiduoS. Assis de Souza MeloS. M. AstonP. AstoneF. AttadioF. AubinK. AultONealG. AvalloneE. A. AvilaS. BabakC. BadgerS. BaeS. BagnascoL. BaiottiR. BajpaiT. BakaK. A. BakerT. BakerG. BalbiG. BaldiN. BaldicchiM. BallG. BallardinS. W. BallmerS. BanagiriB. BanerjeeD. BankarT. M. BaptisteP. BaralM. BarattiJ. C. BarayogaK. BaricB. C. BarishD. BarkerN. BarmanP. BarneoF. BaroneB. BarrM. BarriosL. BarsottiM. BarsugliaD. BartaM. A. BartonI. BartosA. BasalaevR. BassiriA. BastiM. BawajP. BaxiJ. C. BayleyA. C. BaylorP. A. BaynardM. BazzanV. M. BedakihaleF. BeirnaertM. BejgerD. BelardinelliA. S. BellC. BellaniL. BellizziD. Beltran-MartinezW. BenoitI. BentaraM. Ben YaalaS. BeraF. BergaminB. K. BergerS. BernuzziM. BeroizI. BerryD. BersanettiT. BertheasA. BertoliniJ. BetzwieserD. BeveridgeG. BevilacquaN. BevinsR. BhandareR. BhattA. BhattacharjeeD. BhattacharjeeS. BhattacharyyaS. BhaumikV. BiancalanaA. BianchiF. BianchiI. A. BilenkoG. BillingsleyA. BinettiS. BiniC. BinuS. BiotO. BirnholtzS. BiscoveanuA. BishtM. BitossiM. -A. BizouardS. BlaberJ. K. BlackburnL. A. BlaggC. D. BlairD. G. BlairN. BodeN. BoettnerP. BogdanG. BoileauM. BoldriniG. N. BolingbrokeA. BolliandL. D. BonavenaR. BondarescuF. BonduV. A. BonhommeE. BonillaM. S. BonillaA. BoninoR. BonnandA. BorchersN. BorghiV. BoschiS. BoseV. BossilkovY. BothraA. BoudonM. BoyleA. BozziC. BradaschiaM. J. BradyP. R. BradyA. BranchM. BranchesiT. BriantA. BrilletM. BrinkmannP. BrockillE. BrockmuellerA. F. BrooksB. C. BrownD. D. BrownM. L. BrozzettiS. BrunettG. BrunoR. BruntzJ. BryantY. BuF. BucciJ. BuchananO. BulashenkoT. BulikH. J. BultenA. BuonannoK. BurtnykR. BuscicchioD. BuskulicC. BuyR. L. ByerR. CabritaV. Cáceres-BarbosaL. CadonatiG. CagnoliC. CahillaneA. CalafatT. A. CallisterE. CalloniS. R. CallosG. Caneva SantoroK. C. CannonH. CaoL. A. CapistranE. CapocasaG. CapocciaE. CapoteG. CapurriG. CarapellaF. CarbognaniK. J. Cardona-MartínezM. CarlassaraJ. B. CarlinT. K. CarlsonM. F. CarneyM. CarpinelliG. CarrilloJ. J. CarterG. CarulloA. Casallas-LagosJ. Casanueva DiazC. CasentiniS. CaudillM. CavagliàR. CavalieriG. CellaS. CepicP. Cerdá-DuránE. CesariniN. ChabbraW. ChaibiA. ChakrabortyP. ChakrabortyS. ChakrabortyS. Chalathadka SubrahmanyaR. ChalmersC. ChanJ. C. L. ChanM. ChanK. ChangP. CharltonE. Chassande-MottinC. ChatterjeeDebarati ChatterjeeDeep ChatterjeeM. ChaturvediS. ChatyA. ChenA. H. -Y. ChenD. ChenH. ChenH. Y. ChenS. ChenY. ChenG. ChengH. P. ChengP. ChessaT. CheunchitraH. T. CheungS. Y. CheungF. ChiadiniG. ChiariniA. ChibaA. ChincariniD. ChintalaM. L. ChiofaloA. ChiummoC. ChouS. ChoudharyN. ChristensenS. S. Y. ChuaG. CianiP. CiecielagM. CieślarM. CifaldiB. CirokF. ClaraJ. A. ClarkT. A. ClarkeP. ClearwaterS. ClesseF. ClevaS. M. ClyneE. CocciaE. CodazzoP. -F. CohadonD. E. CohenS. ColaceE. ColangeliO. ColeM. ColleoniC. G. ColletteJ. CollinsS. CollomsA. ColomboC. M. ComptonG. ConnollyL. ContiT. R. CorbittI. Cordero-CarriónS. CorezziN. J. CornishI. CoronadoA. CorsiL. A. CoruboloL. CotnoirR. CottinghamM. W. CoughlinP. CouvaresD. M. CowardD. C. CoyneR. CoyneA. CozzumboJ. D. E. CreightonT. D. CreightonS. CrookR. CrouchJ. CsizmaziaJ. R. CudellT. J. CullenA. CummingE. CuocoM. CusinatoL. V. Da ConceiçãoT. Dal CantonS. Dall'OssoS. Dal PraG. DályaO. DanY. DangB. D'AngeloS. DanilishinS. D'AntonioK. DanzmannK. E. DarrochL. P. DartezR. DasA. DasguptaV. DattiloA. DaumasI. DaveA. DavenportM. DavierT. F. DaviesD. DavisL. DavisM. C. DavisP. DavisE. J. DawM. DaxJ. De BolleM. DeenadayalanJ. DegallaixM. De LaurentisC. J. Delgado MendezF. De LilloS. Della TorreW. Del PozzoO. M. del RioA. DemagnyF. De MarcoG. DemasiF. De MatteisN. DemosT. DentA. DepasseN. DePergolaR. De PietriR. De RosaC. De RossiM. DesaiV. DeshmukhR. De SimoneS. DetermanA. DhaniR. DhurkundeR. DiabC. DiazM. C. DíazM. Di CesareG. DideronT. DietrichL. Di FioreC. Di FronzoM. Di GiovanniT. Di GirolamoD. DikshaJ. DingS. Di PaceI. Di PalmaD. Di PieroF. Di Renzo DivyajyotiA. DmitrievJ. P. DochertyZ. DoctorN. DoerksenE. DohmenA. DokeA. Domiciano De SouzaL. D'OnofrioF. DonovanK. L. DooleyT. DooneyS. DoravariO. DoroshF. DosopoulouW. J. D. DoyleM. DragoJ. C. DriggersM. DuboisR. R. DumbreckL. DunnU. DupletsaD. D'UrsoP. Dutta RoyH. DuvalP. -A. DuverneS. E. DwyerC. EassaM. EberhardtM. EbersoldT. EckhardtG. EddollsA. EfflerJ. EichholzH. EinsleM. EisenmannR. A. EisensteinM. EmmaK. EndoR. EnficiaudL. ErricoR. EspinosaM. EspositoR. C. EssickH. EstellésT. EtzelM. EvansT. EvstafyevaB. E. EwingJ. M. EzquiagaF. FabriziV. FafoneS. FairhurstX. FanA. M. FarahB. FarrW. M. FarrM. FavataM. FaysM. FazioJ. FeichtM. M. FejerJ. -N. FeldhusenE. FenyvesiJ. FernandesT. FernandesD. FernandoS. FerraiuoloT. A. FerreiraM. FerrerF. FidecaroP. FiguraA. FioriI. FioriM. FishbachR. P. FisherR. FittipaldiV. FiumaraR. FlaminioS. M. FleischerL. S. FlemingE. FlodenH. FongJ. A. FontF. Fontinele-NunesC. FooB. FornalP. W. F. ForsythK. FranceschettiA. Franco-OrdovasF. FrappezS. FrascaF. FrasconiJ. P. FreedZ. FreiA. FreiseO. FreitasR. FreyW. FrischhertzP. FritschelV. V. FrolovM. Fuentes-GarciaS. FujiiT. FujimoriP. FuldaM. FyffeB. GadreJ. R. GairS. GalaudageV. GaldiR. GambaA. GamboaS. GamojiA. GangulyB. GaraventaP. García AbiaJ. García-BellidoC. García-QuirósJ. W. GardnerS. GargJ. GargiuloX. GarridoA. GarronF. GarufiP. A. GarverC. GasbarraB. GateleyF. GautierV. GayathriT. GayerG. GemmeA. GennaiV. GennariJ. GeorgeR. GeorgeO. GerberdingL. GergelyArchisman GhoshSayantan GhoshShaon GhoshShrobana GhoshSuprovo GhoshTathagata GhoshJ. A. GiaimeK. D. GiardinaD. R. GibsonC. GierS. GkaitatzisJ. GlanzerF. GlotinJ. GodfreyR. V. GodleyP. GodwinA. S. GoettelE. GoetzJ. GolombS. Gomez LopezG. GonzálezP. GoodarziS. GoodeA. Goodwin-JonesM. GosselinC. GostiauxR. GouatyD. W. GouldK. GovorkovaA. GradoA. E. GranadosM. GranataV. GranataS. GrasP. GrassiaC. GrayR. GrayG. GrecoA. C. GreenL. GreenS. M. GreenS. R. GreenA. M. GretarssonE. M. GretarssonH. K. GriffinD. GriffithH. L. GriggsG. GrignaniC. GrimaudH. GroteS. GrunewaldD. GuerraA. G. GuerreroD. GuettaG. M. GuidiT. GuidryH. K. GulatiF. GulminelliA. M. GunnyH. GuoW. GuoY. GuoAnuradha GuptaI. GuptaN. C. GuptaS. K. GuptaV. GuptaN. GupteJ. GursN. GutierrezN. GuttmanF. GuzmanD. HabaM. HaberlandS. HainoE. D. HallE. Z. HamiltonG. HammondM. HaneyJ. HanksC. HannaM. D. HannamO. A. HannukselaH. HansenJ. HansonR. HaradaA. R. HardisonS. HarikumarK. HarisI. Harley-TrochimczykT. HarmarkJ. HarmsG. M. HarryI. W. HarryJ. HartM. T. HartmanB. HaskellC. -J. HasterK. HaughianH. HayakawaK. HayamaA. HeffernanD. HegdeM. C. HeintzeJ. HeinzeJ. HeinzelH. HeitmannF. HellmanA. F. Helmling-CornellG. HemmingO. Henderson-SapirM. HendryI. S. HengM. H. HennigC. HenshawM. HeursA. L. HewittJ. HeynenJ. HeynsS. HigginbothamS. HildS. HillY. HimemotoN. HirataC. HiroseW. C. G. HoD. HofmanB. E. HoganN. A. HollandK. Holley-BockelmannI. J. HollowsD. E. HolzL. HonetK. M. HoopsM. E. HoqueD. J. Horton-BaileyJ. HoughS. HourihaneN. T. HowardE. J. HowellC. G. HoyC. A. HrishikeshP. HsiH. -F. HsiehH. -Y. HsiehC. HsiungS. -H. HsuW. -F. HsuQ. HuH. Y. HuangY. HuangY. T. HuangA. D. HuddartB. HugheyV. HuiS. HusaL. IampieriG. A. IandoloM. IanniG. IannoneJ. IascauK. IdeR. IdenA. IerardiS. IkedaH. ImafukuY. InoueG. IorioP. IosifJ. IrwinR. IshikawaT. IshikawaM. IsiK. S. IsleifY. ItohS. IwaguchiM. IwayaB. R. IyerC. D. JacksonC. JacquetP. -E. JacquetT. JacquotS. J. JadhavS. P. JadhavM. JainT. JainA. L. JamesK. JaniJ. JanquartN. N. JanthalurS. JarabaP. JaranowskiR. JaumeW. JavedM. JensenW. JiaJ. JiangH. -B. JinG. R. JohnsN. A. JohnsonR. JohnstonN. JohnyD. H. JonesD. I. JonesR. JonesH. E. JoseP. JoshiS. K. JoshiG. JoubertJ. JuL. JuI. L. Juarez-ReyesK. JungJ. JunkerV. JusteH. B. KabagozT. KajitaI. KakuV. KalogeraM. KalomenopoulosM. KamiizumiN. KandaS. KandhasamyG. KangJ. B. KannerS. A. KantiMahantyS. J. KapadiaD. P. KapasiM. KarthikeyanM. KasprzackH. KatoT. KatoE. KatsavounidisW. KatzmanR. KaushikK. KawabeR. KawamotoD. KeitelS. A. KemperL. J. KempermanJ. KenningtonF. A. KerkowR. KesharwaniJ. S. KeyR. KhadelaS. KhadkaS. S. KhadkikarF. Y. KhaliliF. KhanT. KhanamM. KhursheedN. M. KhusidW. KiendrebeogoN. KijbunchooC. KimJ. C. KimK. KimM. H. KimS. KimY. -M. KimC. KimballK. KimesM. KinnearJ. S. KisselS. KlimenkoA. M. KneeE. J. KnoxN. KnustK. KobayashiS. M. KoehlenbeckG. KoekoekK. KohriK. KokeyamaS. KoleyP. KolitsidouA. E. KoloniariK. KomoriK. KompanetsA. K. H. KongA. KontosK. KopczukL. M. KoponenM. KorobkoX. KouA. KoushikN. KouvatsosM. KovalamT. KoyamaD. B. KozakE. KrajaS. L. KranzhoffV. KringelN. V. KrishnenduS. KrokerA. KrólakK. KruskaJ. KubiszG. KuehnA. Kulur RamamohanAchal KumarAnil KumarPraveen KumarPrayush KumarRahul KumarRakesh KumarJ. KumeK. KunsN. KuntimaddiS. KuroyanagiS. KuwaharaK. KwakK. KwanS. KwonG. LacailleD. LaghiA. H. LaityA. LakhalE. LalandeM. LallemanS. LalvaniM. LandryR. N. LangJ. LangeR. LangginB. LantzI. La RosaA. Lartaux-VollardP. D. LaskyL. LavezziJ. LawrenceM. LaxenC. LazarteA. LazzariniC. LazzaroP. LeaciL. LealiY. K. LecoeucheH. W. LeeJ. LeeK. LeeR. -K. LeeR. LeeSungho LeeSunjae LeeY. LeeI. N. LegredJ. LehmannL. LehnerM. Le JeanA. LemaîtreM. LentiM. LeonardiM. LequimeN. LeroyM. LesovskyN. LetendreM. LethuillierS. E. LevinY. LevinS. LexmondK. LeydeK. L. LiT. G. F. LiX. LiY. LiZ. LiQ. LiangA. LihosE. T. LinF. LinL. C. -C. LinY. -C. LinC. LindsayS. D. LinkerA. LiuG. C. LiuJian LiuS. LiuF. Llamas VillarrealJ. Llobera-QuerolR. K. L. LoJ. -P. LocquetS. C. G. LogginsM. R. LoizouL. T. LondonA. LongoD. LopezM. Lopez PortillaA. Lorenzo-MedinaV. LorietteM. LormandG. LosurdoE. LottiT. P. LottJ. D. LoughH. A. LoughlinC. O. LoustoN. K. Y LowN. LuL. LucchesiH. LückO. LukinaD. LumacaA. P. LundgrenL. LunghiniA. W. LussierX. MaD. M. MacleodI. A. O. MacMillanA. MacquetS. S. MadekarK. MaedaS. MaenautS. S. MagareR. M. MageeE. MaggioR. MaggioreM. MagnozziP. MahapatraM. MaheshS. MajhiE. MajoranaC. N. MakaremE. MakeleleD. MalakarJ. A. Malaquias-ReisU. MaliS. MaliakalA. MalikL. MallickA. -K. MalzN. ManM. MancarellaV. MandicV. ManganoB. MannixG. L. MansellM. ManskeM. MantovaniM. MapelliS. MarchettiC. MarinelliF. MarionA. S. MarkosyanA. MarkowitzE. MarosS. MarsatF. MartelliI. W. MartinR. M. MartinB. B. MartinezD. A. MartinezM. MartinezV. MartinezA. MartiniJ. C. MartinsD. V. MartynovE. J. MarxL. MassaroA. MasserotM. Masso-ReidT. MastersS. MastrogiovanniG. MastropasquaT. MatcovichM. MatiushechkinaA. Matte-LandryL. MaurinN. MavalvalaN. MaxwellG. McCarrolR. McCarthyD. E. McClellandS. McCormickL. McCullerL. I. McDermottS. McEachinC. McElhennyG. I. McGheeK. B. M. McGowanJ. McIverA. McLeodT. McRaeR. McTeagueD. MeacherB. N. MeagherR. MechumQ. MeijerA. MelatosC. S. MenoniF. MeraR. A. MercerL. MereniK. MerfeldE. L. MerilhG. MerinoJ. R. MérouJ. D. MerrittM. MerzouguiC. MessickB. MestichelliM. Meyer-CondeF. MeylahnA. MhaskeA. MianiH. MiaoI. MichaloliakosC. MichelY. MichimuraH. MiddletonD. P. MihaylovS. J. MillerM. MillhouseE. MilottiV. MilottiY. MinenkovE. M. MinihanLl. M. MirL. MirasolaC. -A. MiritescuA. MishraC. MishraT. MishraA. L. MitchellJ. G. MitchellO. MitchemS. MitraV. P. MitrofanovK. MitsuhashiR. MittlemanO. MiyakawaS. MiyokiG. MoL. MobiliaS. R. P. MohapatraS. R. MohiteM. Molina-RuizM. MondinM. MontaniC. J. MooreD. MoraruA. MoreS. MoreC. MorenoE. A. MorenoG. MorenoA. Moreso SerraC. MorganS. MorisakiY. MoriwakiG. MorrasA. MoscatelloM. MouldB. MoursC. M. Mow-LowryL. MuccilloF. MuciacciaArunava MukherjeeD. MukherjeeSamanwaya MukherjeeSoma MukherjeeSubroto MukherjeeSuvodip MukherjeeN. MukundA. MullaveyC. L. MungioliM. MurakoshiP. G. MurrayD. NabariS. L. NadjiS. NadjiA. NagarN. NagarajanK. NakagakiK. NakamuraH. NakanoM. NakanoD. Nanadoumgar-LacrozeD. NandiV. NapolanoS. U. NaqviP. NarayanI. NardecchiaT. NarikawaH. NarolaL. NaticchioniR. K. NayakJ. NeesonL. NegriA. NelaC. NelleA. NelsonT. J. N. NelsonA. NemmaniM. NeryA. NeunzertM. NewellS. NgL. Nguyen QuynhA. B. NielsenY. NishinoA. NishizawaS. NissankeW. NiuF. NoceraJ. NollerM. NormanC. NorthJ. NovakR. NowickiJ. F. Nuño SilesG. NurbekL. K. NuttallK. ObayashiJ. OberlingC. E. OchoaJ. O'DellM. OertelG. OganesyanT. O'HanlonM. OhashiF. OhmeI. OkeR. OmerB. O'NealM. OnishiK. OoharaB. O'ReillyM. OrselliR. O'ShaughnessyS. OshinoC. OsthelderI. OtaG. OthmanD. J. OttawayA. OuzriatH. OvermierB. J. OwenR. OzakiA. E. PaceR. PaganoM. A. PageA. PaiL. PaiellaA. PalS. PalM. A. PalaiaM. PálfiP. P. PalmaC. PalombaP. PaludH. PanJ. PanK. -C. PanP. K. PandaShiksha PandeySwadha PandeyP. T. H. PangF. PannaraleK. A. PannoneB. C. PantF. H. PantherM. PanzeriF. PaolettiA. PaoloneA. PapadopoulosE. E. PapalexakisL. PapaliniG. PapigkiotisA. PaquisA. ParisiB. -J. ParkJ. ParkW. ParkerG. PascaleD. PascucciA. PasqualettiR. PassaquietiL. PassengerD. PassuelloO. PataneA. V. PatelD. PathakA. PatraB. PatricelliB. G. PattersonK. PaulS. PaulE. PayneT. PearceM. PedrazaA. PeleF. E. Peña ArellanoX. PengY. PengS. PennM. D. PenuliarA. PeregoZ. PereiraC. PérigoisG. PernaA. PerrecaJ. PerretS. PerrièsJ. W. PerryS. PetersS. PetraccaC. PetrilloH. P. PfeifferH. PhamK. A. PhamK. S. PhukonH. PhurailatpamM. PiarulliL. PiccariO. J. PiccinniM. PichotA. PiedM. PiendibeneF. PiergiovanniL. PieriniG. PierraV. PierroM. PietrzakM. PillasL. PinardI. M. PintoM. PintoB. J. PiotrzkowskiM. PirelloM. D. PitkinA. PlacidiE. PlacidiM. L. PlanasW. PlastinoC. PlunkettR. PoggianiE. PoliniJ. PomperL. PompiliJ. PoonE. PorcelliA. S. PorterE. K. PorterC. PosnanskyR. PoultonJ. PowellG. S. PrabhuM. PracchiaB. K. PradhanT. PradierA. K. PrajapatiK. PrasaiR. PrasannaP. PrasiaG. PrattenA. PraveenG. PrincipeG. A. ProdiP. ProsperiP. ProspositoA. PuecherJ. PullinP. PuppoM. PürrerH. QiM. QiaoJ. QinG. QuéménerV. QuetschkeP. J. QuinonezR. RadingI. RainhoS. RajaC. RajanB. RajbhandariK. E. RamirezF. A. Ramis VidalM. Ramos ArevaloA. Ramos-BuadesS. RanjanM. RanjbarK. RansomP. RapagnaniB. RattoA. RavichandranA. RayV. RaymondM. RazzanoJ. ReadJ. ReganT. RegimbauT. ReichardtS. ReidC. ReisselD. H. ReitzeA. I. RenziniB. RevenuA. Revilla PeñaL. RiccaF. RicciM. RicciA. RicciardoneJ. RiceJ. W. RichardsonM. L. RichardsonA. RijalK. RilesH. K. RileyS. RinaldiJ. RittmeyerC. RobertsonF. RobinetM. RobinsonA. RocchiL. RollandJ. G. RollinsA. E. RomanoR. RomanoA. Romero-RodríguezI. M. Romero-ShawJ. H. RomieS. RonchiniT. J. RoockeL. RosaT. J. RosauerC. A. RoseD. RosińskaM. P. RossM. Rossello-SastreS. RowanK. RowlandsS. K. RoyS. RoyD. RozzaP. RuggiN. RuhamaG. H. RuizE. Ruiz MoralesK. Ruiz-RochaV. RussS. SachdevT. SadeckiP. SaffariehS. Safi-HarbM. R. SahS. SahaT. SainratS. Sajith MenonK. SakaiY. SakaiM. SakellariadouS. SakonO. S. SalafiaF. Salces-CarcobaL. SalconiM. SaleemF. SalemiM. SalléS. U. SalunkheS. SalvadorA. SalvareseA. SamajdarA. SanchezE. J. SanchezN. Sanchis-GualJ. R. SandersE. M. SängerF. SantoliquidoF. SarandreaT. R. SaravananN. SarinP. SarkarA. SasliP. SassiB. SassolasR. SatoS. SatoYukino SatoYu SatoO. SauterR. L. SavageT. SawadaH. L. SawantS. SayahV. ScaccoD. SchaetzlM. ScheelA. SchiebelbeinM. G. SchiworskiP. SchmidtS. SchmidtR. SchnabelM. SchneewindR. M. S. SchofieldK. SchoutedenB. W. SchulteM. SchulzB. F. SchutzE. SchwartzM. ScialpiJ. ScottS. M. ScottR. M. SedasT. C. SeetharamuM. Seglar-ArroyoY. SekiguchiD. SellersN. SemboA. S. SenguptaE. G. SeoJ. W. SeoV. SequinoM. SerraA. SevrinT. ShafferU. S. ShahM. A. ShaikhL. ShaoJ. SharkeyA. K. SharmaPreeti SharmaPriyanka SharmaRitwik SharmaSushant Sharma-ChaudharyP. ShawhanN. S. ShcheblanovE. SheridanZ. -H. ShiR. ShimomuraH. ShinkaiS. ShirkeD. H. ShoemakerD. M. ShoemakerR. W. ShortS. ShyamSundarA. SiderH. SiegelV. SierraD. SiggL. SilenziL. SilvestriM. SimmondsL. P. SingerAmitesh SinghAnika SinghD. SinghM. K. SinghN. SinghS. SinghA. M. SintesV. SipalaV. SklirisB. J. J. SlagmolenT. J. Slaven-BlairJ. SmetanaD. A. SmithJ. R. SmithL. SmithR. J. E. SmithW. J. SmithS. Soares de Albuquerque FilhoK. SomiyaI. SongS. SoniV. SordiniF. SorrentinoH. SotaniF. SpadaV. SpagnuoloA. P. SpencerP. SpinicelliA. K. SrivastavaF. StachurskiC. J. StarkD. A. SteerN. SteinleJ. SteinlechnerS. SteinlechnerN. StergioulasP. StevensM. StPierreM. D. StrongA. StrunkA. L. StuverM. SuchenekS. SudhagarY. SudoN. SueltmannL. SuleimanK. D. SullivanJ. SunL. SunS. SunilJ. SureshB. J. SuttonP. J. SuttonK. SuzukiM. SuzukiA. SvizzerettoB. L. SwinkelsA. SyxM. J. SzczepańczykP. SzewczykM. TaccaM. TagliazucchiH. TagoshiS. C. TaitK. TakadaH. TakahashiR. TakahashiA. TakamoriS. TakanoH. TakedaK. TakeshitaI. Takimoto SchmiegelowM. Takou-AyaohC. TalbotM. TamakiN. TamaniniD. TanabeK. TanakaS. J. TanakaS. TaniokaD. B. TannerW. TannerL. TaoR. D. TapiaE. N. Tapia San MartínC. TarantoA. TaruyaJ. D. TassonJ. G. TauA. TejeraR. TenorioH. ThemannA. TheodoropoulosM. P. ThirugnanasambandamL. M. ThomasM. ThomasP. ThomasJ. E. ThompsonS. R. ThondapuK. A. ThorneE. ThraneJ. TissinoA. TiwariPawan TiwariPraveer TiwariS. TiwariV. TiwariM. R. ToddE. TofaniM. ToffanoA. M. ToivonenK. TolandA. E. TolleyT. TomaruV. TommasiniT. TomuraH. TongC. Tong-YuA. Torres-FornéC. I. TorrieI. Tosta e MeloE. TournefierM. Trad NeryA. TrapanantiR. TravagliniF. TravassoG. TraylorM. TrevorM. C. TringaliA. TripatheeG. TroianA. TrovatoL. TrozzoR. J. TrudeauT. TsangS. TsuchidaK. TsujiL. TsukadaK. TurbangM. TurconiC. TurskiH. UbachA. S. UbhiT. UchiyamaR. P. UdallT. UeharaK. UenoV. UndheimL. E. UronenT. UshibaM. VacatelloH. VahlbruchG. VajenteJ. ValenciaM. ValentiniE. Vallejo-PagèsS. A. Vallejo-PeñaS. ValleroM. van DaelE. Van den BosscheJ. F. J. van den BrandC. Van Den BroeckM. van der KolkM. van der SluysA. Van de WalleJ. van DongenK. VandraM. VanDykeH. van HaevermaetJ. V. van HeijningenP. Van HoveJ. VanierJ. VanoskyN. van RemortelM. VardaroA. F. VargasV. VarmaA. VecchioG. VedovatoJ. VeitchP. J. VeitchS. VenikoudisJ. VennebergR. C. VentereaP. VerdierM. VereeckenD. VerkindtB. VermaY. VermaS. M. VermeulenF. VetranoA. VeutroA. ViceréS. VidyantA. D. VietsA. VijaykumarA. VilkhaN. Villanueva EspinosaV. Villa-OrtegaE. T. VincentJ. -Y. VinetS. ViretS. VitaleA. VivesL. VizmegH. VoccaD. VoigtE. R. G. von ReisJ. S. A. von WrangelW. E. VossiusL. VujevaS. P. VyatchaninJ. WackL. E. WadeM. WadeK. J. WagnerL. WallaceE. J. WangH. WangW. H. WangY. F. WangZ. WangG. WaratkarR. L. WardJ. WarnerM. WasT. WashimiN. Y. WashingtonB. WeaverS. A. WebsterN. L. WeickhardtM. WeinertA. J. WeinsteinR. WeissL. WenK. WetteC. WheelerJ. T. WhelanB. F. WhitingE. G. WickensD. WilkenB. M. WilliamsD. WilliamsM. J. WilliamsN. S. WilliamsJ. L. WillisB. WillkeM. WilsL. WilsonC. W. WinbornJ. WinterfloodC. C. WipfG. WoanJ. WoehlerN. E. WolfeH. T. WongI. C. F. WongK. WongT. WoutersJ. L. WrightM. WrightB. WuC. WuD. S. WuH. WuK. WuQ. WuZ. WuE. WuchnerD. M. WysockiV. A. XuY. XuN. YadavH. YamamotoK. YamamotoT. S. YamamotoT. YamamotoR. YamazakiT. YanH. YangK. Z. YangY. YangZ. YarbroughJ. YebanaS. -W. YehA. B. YelikarX. YinJ. YokoyamaT. YokozawaS. YuanH. YuzuriharaM. ZanolinM. ZeeshanT. ZelenovaJ. -P. ZendriM. ZeoliM. ZerradM. ZevinH. ZhangL. ZhangN. ZhangR. ZhangT. ZhangC. ZhaoYue ZhaoYuhang ZhaoZ. -C. ZhaoY. ZhengH. ZhongH. ZhouH. O. ZhuZ. -H. ZhuZ. ZhuA. B. ZimmermanL. ZimmermannM. E. ZuckerS. B. Araujo FurlanZ. ArzoumanianE. CarliI. CognardM. CuryloS. del PalacioC. M. EspinozaE. FonsecaG. GancioF. GarcìaK. C. GendreauL. GuillemotS. GuillotM. J. KeithL. KuiperA. G. LyneB. W. MeyersM. T. MilesJ. L. PalfreymanA. B. PearlmanD. J. ReardonG. E. RomeroR. M. ShannonB. ShawI. H. StairsB. W. StappersG. TheureauP. WeltevredeE. Zubietahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25846v1From Jets to Failed Supernovae: Morphologies and Gravitational-Wave Signatures in Two-Dimensional Magnetorotational Core-Collapse Supernovae2026-03-26T19:14:20ZMagnetized and rotating core-collapse supernovae (CCSNe) are promising candidates for producing long gamma-ray bursts and hypernovae. In this project, we present 34 two-dimensional magnetized core-collapse supernova simulations with self-consistent neutrino transport, systematically exploring the parameter space of initial magnetic field strengths ($B_0 = 0$--$3.5 \times 10^{12}$~G) and rotation rates ($Ω_0 = 0$--$0.5$~rad~s$^{-1}$) for a 40~$M_\odot$ progenitor. Our simulations reveal four distinct explosion morphologies: failed explosions leading to black hole formation, monopolar jet explosions, bipolar jet explosions, and neutrino-driven explosions. We find that the 40 $M_\odot$ progenitor model failed to explode without magnetic fields in two dimensions, even with rapid rotation. The non-rotating models require strong seed magnetic fields ($B_0 \gtrsim 1.5 \times 10^{12}$~G) to launch magnetically driven explosions, while the introduction of rotation substantially lowers this threshold. The explosion timescale decreases systematically with both increasing magnetic field strength and rotation rate, ranging from $>500$~ms in marginally successful models to $<150$~ms in strongly magnetized, rapidly rotating systems. Diagnostic explosion energies in the most extreme models approach $\sim 10^{51}$~erg within 250~ms and continue growing in time, making them potential hypernovae and long gamma-ray burst progenitors. Finally, we analyze the gravitational wave signatures associated with each morphology and find that the gravitational wave frequencies mainly depend on the rotation rates but are less sensitive to the magnetic field strengths and explosion morphologies. However, the gravitational wave amplitudes strongly depend on the explosion morphologies and magnetic fields, making searches for gravitational waves from magnetorotational core-collapse supernovae more challenging.2026-03-26T19:14:20Z24 pages, 14 figures. Submitted to Classical and Quantum Gravity for the focus issue "Core Collapse Supernova Gravitational Wave Theory and Detection: Past Present and Future"Kuo-Chuan PanYi-Fang Lihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25809v1Binary neutron star mergers with tabulated equations of state in SPHINCS_BSSN2026-03-26T18:14:27ZThe dynamics and observable signatures of neutron star mergers are governed by physics under the most extreme conditions. They are particularly impacted by the high-density equation of state, which for the most sophisticated models is usually available in the form of tables. Numerical relativity codes usually evolve particularly well-behaved numerical ("conservative") variables, but at the price that the physically interesting ("primitive") variables need to be found at every computational element and at every integration sub-step by means of expensive (and not always successful) root-finding algorithms. We have recently developed the Lagrangian numerical relativity code SPHINCS_BSSN which evolves the spacetime on an adaptive mesh with well tested methods, but the fluid is evolved by means of freely moving particles. Since our evolution equations differ from those of conventional numerical relativity, we need to develop new conservative-to-primitive algorithms if we want to use tabulated equations of state. We present here three such algorithms: a 3D and a 2D Newton-Raphson method and a 1D root-finding algorithm based on Ridders' method. We find the 3D method to be very fast and robust with an average failure fraction in a full-blown neutron star merger simulation (with the DD2 equation of state) well below 1%. While we do not find obvious advantages for the 2D method, the 1D Ridders' method is slow, but essentially fail-safe. Therefore, we choose the 3D Newton-Raphson as default and fall back to the 1D Ridders' method as a safe "parachute".2026-03-26T18:14:27Z19 pages, 5 figuresSwapnil ShankarStephan RosswogPeter Dienerhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25669v1Double-Adiabatic Equations of State for Relativistic Plasmas2026-03-26T17:25:02ZThe adiabatic equation of state $P \propto n^Γ$ describes the pressure evolution of highly collisional, isotropic plasmas in terms of their density, providing a possible closure of the fluid moment hierarchy in the absence of heat fluxes and dissipation. An analogous closure exists for collisionless, magnetised plasmas, whose pressure tensor is anisotropic with respect to the magnetic field, and the closure is therefore double-adiabatic, prescribing the evolution of the parallel and perpendicular pressures in terms of the magnetic-field strength and density. Here, we present a general first-principle formalism to derive adiabatic laws using the symmetries of the system. With this theory we recover the adiabatic equation of state $P \propto n^Γ$ for isotropic plasmas and the double-adiabatic equations of state for collisionless, magnetised plasmas. We extend the latter to the relativistic regime, finding that their exact functional form depends on the pressure anisotropy and is not a simple power law. Our double-adiabatic equations of state describe simple geometries, like magnetic mirrors or compressed homogeneous plasmas, as well as complex high-energy astrophysical processes, such as the evolution of plasmoid structures formed during magnetic reconnection.2026-03-26T17:25:02ZSubmitted for publication, 12 pages, 4 figuresAgnieszka WierzchuckaPablo J. BilbaoAlexander G. R. ThomasDmitri A. UzdenskyAlexander A. Schekochihinhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25594v1On the double-adiabatic equations in the relativistic regime2026-03-26T16:10:05ZWe revisit the double adiabatic evolution equations and extend them to the relativistic and ultrarelativistic regimes. We analytically solve the relativistic, time-dependent drift kinetic equation for a homogeneous, magnetized, collisionless plasma and obtain a solution explicitly dependent on the magnetic field and density variations. In the case of an initial relativistic Maxwellian distribution, a natural extension to an anisotropic Maxwell-Jüttner is obtained. We calculate the moments of this time-dependent solution and obtain analytical expressions for the evolution of the perpendicular and parallel pressures in the ultrarelativistic case. We numerically solve the moment equations in the relativistic case and obtain general expressions for the double-adiabatic equations in this regime. We confirm our results using fully kinetic particle-in-cell simulations of shearing and compressing boxes. Our findings can be readily applied to relativistic species including cosmic-rays and electron-positron pairs, present in astrophysical plasmas like pulsar wind nebulae, astrophysical jets, black hole accretion flows, and Van Allen radiation belts.2026-03-26T16:10:05Z29 pages, 8 figuresFrancisco LeyAaron TranEllen G. Zweibelhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.19839v2A dual description of quarks and baryons: Quarkyonic matter within a relativistic quark model2026-03-26T16:00:27ZWe investigate quarkyonic matter within a relativistic quark model by combining the dual quarkyonic picture with the quark-meson coupling (QMC) model. Using relativistic gaussian quark wavefunctions for the nucleon, we construct the quarkyonic QMC (QQMC) model and study the properties of symmetric nuclear matter and pure neutron matter. We find that the quark saturation density depends sensitively on the nucleon size parameter and that nuclear interactions quantitatively modify the high-density behavior of the equation of state (EoS) and the sound velocity. In particular, the QQMC model yields an earlier onset of quark saturation than the noninteracting gaussian quarkyonic (GQ) model, indicating that nuclear interactions enhance the stiffening of the EoS in the quarkyonic regime.2026-03-20T10:29:19Z4 papes, 4 figures, 2 table, proceedings of The 2025 International Conference on the Structure of Baryons (Baryons 2025), Jeju, Korea, 10-14 Nov, 2025; v2: minor changesTsuyoshi MiyatsuMyung-Ki CheounKoichi Saitohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25491v1QED cross sections in strong magnetic fields2026-03-26T14:28:50ZThe magnetospheres of magnetars, a class of highly magnetized neutron stars, host magnetic fields exceeding the Schwinger limit, where Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) becomes nonlinear. In such environments, QED scattering processes are strongly modified, which may affect plasma dynamics. In this work, we apply a formalism originally developed for the study of magnetic-field effects in hot quark-gluon plasma to strong-field QED. The method resums interactions between virtual electrons and the external magnetic field, consistently incorporating the finite decay widths of excited Landau levels derived from the fermion self-energy. Using this framework, we perform the first systematic analysis of tree-level QED scattering processes in strong magnetic fields, concentrating on the processes of highest relevance for the plasma dynamics of magnetars. All resulting cross sections are provided in an open-source Python package.2026-03-26T14:28:50Z8 pages, 7 figures, 3 appendicesOlavi KiuruJoonas NättiläRisto PaatelainenAleksi Vuorinenhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25331v1Jet Power Estimates of FSRQs PKS 1441+25 and Ton 599 from Broadband SED Modeling2026-03-26T11:19:36ZFlat-Spectrum Radio Quasars (FSRQs) are among the most energetic and powerful active galactic nuclei, often exhibiting jet powers comparable to or exceeding the Eddington luminosity. In this work, we performed broadband spectral energy distribution (SED) modeling of two FSRQs PKS 1441+25 and Ton 599, using Swift-XRT/UVOT, NuSTAR, Fermi-LAT and VERITAS observations during 2015 and 2021, respectively. We considered four particle distribution models: a broken power law, a log-parabola, and two energy-dependent models in which either the diffusion or acceleration timescale depends on energy. Our results show that the jet power estimates derived from models with intrinsic curvature, such as the log-parabola and energy-dependent models, are of the same order as those obtained with a broken power-law distribution. This contrasts with the case of High Synchrotron Peaked Blazars (HBLs), where the power estimates can differ by nearly two orders of magnitude between models. We attribute this difference to the lower electron break energies typically observed in FSRQs. Consequently, our findings suggest that, unlike in HBLs, the estimated jet powers in FSRQs are relatively insensitive to the assumed particle energy distribution, reflecting the dominance of external Compton processes and weaker dependence on spectral curvature.2026-03-26T11:19:36ZHritwik BoraRanjeev MisraRukaiya KhatoonRupjyoti Gogoi10.3847/1538-4357/ae5630http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25185v1Verification of the Polarimetric Capability of the East Asia VLBI Network2026-03-26T08:52:40ZThe East Asia VLBI Network (EAVN) has recently enabled dual-polarization observations at $22$ and $43\,\mathrm{GHz}$. We present the first systematic verification of its polarimetric performance using EAVN observations of M87, 3C 279, 3C 273, and OJ 287, calibrated with the GPCAL pipeline and evaluated against near-contemporaneous VLBA images at comparable frequencies. Most stations show stable polarimetric leakages with amplitudes of $5$-$10\%$ over monthly timescales. While several VERA stations exhibit D-term phase variations between epochs, we attribute these to field-rotator (FR) offsets and demonstrate that phase stability is restored after applying the analytically derived FR corrections. The resulting linear-polarization morphologies and EVPAs broadly agree with the VLBA results within uncertainties; fractional polarization measured by the EAVN tends to be slightly higher near polarization peaks. Although exact one-to-one comparisons are limited by moderate frequency and epoch differences, the combined evidence indicates robust EAVN polarimetric calibration and imaging capabilities at $22$ and $43\,\mathrm{GHz}$. These results support the scientific capability of EAVN polarimetry and lay the groundwork for expanded, higher-fidelity polarimetric studies in East Asia.2026-03-26T08:52:40Z18 pages, 14 Figures, 3 Tables, Accepted for Publication in PASPYunjeong LeeJongho ParkDo-Young ByunMinchul KamKazuhiro HadaJuan Carlos AlgabaSanghyun KimZhiqiang ShenJunghwan OhSincheol KangHyeon-Woo JeongWhee Yeon CheongSang-Sung Leehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.22262v2Conformal symmetry in force-free electrodynamics2026-03-26T07:51:58ZIt is shown that conformal symmetry exists in force-free electrodynamics (FFE) in Minkowski spacetime, a foundational framework for describing magnetospheres around astronomical objects. In force-free magnetospheres, charges are constrained to move along magnetic field lines and experience zero Lorentz force, due to the everywhere perpendicular orientation of electric and magnetic fields. However, a general angle-preserving conformal mapping of force-free fields does not necessarily produce another physically admissible force-free configuration when sources are present. In this work, we demonstrate that such invariance can nevertheless arise for certain choices of the free functions. Specifically, the governing stream equation is shown to be invariant under Möbius transformations. This symmetry reveals a structural linkage between known solutions and, notably, maps the region inside a magnetospheric horizon (the lightsurface) of one solution to the exterior of its dual counterpart, and vice versa.2026-02-25T03:58:47Z10 pages, 0 figureHuiquan LiJianyong Wang10.1103/hy9g-pvxvhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25102v1Binary neutron star mergers with a subsolar mass star2026-03-26T07:18:40ZWhile there are a number of proposed formation channels for subsolar mass compact objects, including black holes formed primordially, or neutron stars that form in collapsar disks, there have yet to be any conclusive observations of such objects. Motivated by the possibility that, if such objects exist, gravitational waves from binary mergers may reveal them, we study binary neutron star mergers where one star has a subsolar-mass in order to determine how well such systems are described by current models, and when they could be distinguished from a system with a subsolar-mass black hole. We perform fully general-relativistic simulations of a $1.7\ M_{\odot}$ star merging with a $0.8\ M_{\odot}$ star, leading to tidal deformabilities of up to $\mathcal{O}(10^4)$ for the latter, and quantify how this affects the merger dynamics and associated gravitation and electromagnetic signals. In this regime, we find mass transfer between the stars, as well as significantly lower disruption frequencies. Though this is not captured by current gravitational waveform models, we conclude that this does not significantly impact the sensitivity of current gravitational wave detectors to these sources. Assuming design sensitivity of the LIGO and Virgo detectors, we find no biases in the recovered intrinsic parameters for signal-to-noise ratios $\lesssim 100$. We also find that the large deformabilities lead to a significant increase in the amount of dynamically ejected matter compared to equal mass systems, exceeding the predictions of current phenomenological models.2026-03-26T07:18:40Z18 pages, 11 figuresMaxence CormanWilliam E. EastJocelyn S. Read