https://arxiv.org/api/Y/mpQFLx3Xh6wicddpxAFu6tVg02026-06-23T20:37:24Z7793394515http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21586v1Still non-accelerating: age-bias correction in supernova cosmology is robust to host-progenitor age mapping2026-05-20T18:00:02ZWe re-examine the claim by Wiseman et al. (2026) that progenitor-age bias has a negligible impact on cosmological inferences from Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia). We show that their inferred host-age-Hubble residual (HR) slope is severely underestimated because their combined SN Ia sample spans an unusually wide redshift range ($0.04 < z < 0.42$), over which the mean host age evolves by $\sim$\,3 Gyr. As a result, SNe Ia spanning substantial host-age differences are effectively assigned similar HR values prior to regression, artificially flattening the inferred age-HR relation. In addition, their application of the Pantheon+ host-mass correction further suppresses the slope, but the underlying dust model is highly incompatible with the measured dust attenuation curves of galaxies. We also demonstrate that our age bias correction is robust to uncertainties in host-progenitor age mapping arising from different choices of the SN Ia delay-time distribution. The reduced progenitor-age evolution argued by Wiseman et al. (2026) must, by the same logic, be accompanied by a steeper inferred progenitor-age-HR slope. When these two effects are consistently combined in computing the redshift-dependent magnitude correction, the final correction, and hence the resulting cosmological impact, remain largely unchanged from Son et al. (2025).2026-05-20T18:00:02Z5 pages, 2 figures, submitted to MNRASChul ChungJunhyuk SonSeunghyun ParkSuk-Jin YoonHyejeon ChoDongwook LimYoung-Wook Leehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21579v1Interstellar Medium-Driven Orbital Transport -- I. Radial Heating and Migration2026-05-20T18:00:01ZInterstellar medium (ISM) structures gravitationally perturb stellar orbits in galactic disks, driving orbital heating and migration. However, studies of these transport processes tend to model the ISM very crudely, e.g., as a collection of compact, spherical ``clouds'' moving in the disk plane. Here, we revisit this problem with more realistic models of ISM density fluctuations drawn from the TIGRESS-NCR magnetohydrodynamic simulations, which follow the physics governing the ISM in Milky-Way-like conditions at high resolution. By integrating test-particle trajectories through time-dependent TIGRESS-NCR structures, we uncover transport behavior that contrasts sharply with conventional theoretical expectations. Notably, radial heating scales as $σ_R \propto t^{1/2}$ for initially cold orbits at early times, and $σ_R \propto t^{1/5}$ for warmer orbits at late times, contrary to the classic $σ_R \propto t^{1/3}$ prediction. The ISM drives substantial radial migration, accounting for $\gtrsim 30\%$ of that observed in the solar neighborhood (even without stellar spiral structure), and leads to a very low heating-to-migration ratio of $\mathrm{rms}\,δJ_R\,/\,\mathrm{rms}\,δJ_\varphi \approx 0.055$, where $J_R$ and $J_\varphi$ are the radial and azimuthal actions respectively. Vertical motion suppresses the amplitude of radial transport, but does not change the basic scalings. All our simulation results can be explained using quasilinear diffusion theory, accounting for the fact that the dominant ISM fluctuations have wavelengths of $λ_* \sim 600\,$pc and correlation timescales of $τ_* \sim 70\,$Myr. We provide simple fitting formulae for the corresponding diffusion coefficients. In Paper II, we study the ISM's role in vertical disk heating.2026-05-20T18:00:01Z31 pages, 10 figures. Submitted to ApJ, comments are welcome!Shaunak ModakChris HamiltonEve C. OstrikerScott Tremainehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21580v1Massquerade: Impacts of Mass Ratio Reversals on Binary Black Hole Merger Rates and Mass Distributions2026-05-20T18:00:01ZWe investigate the role of mass ratio reversal (MRR), in which the initially less massive star in a binary forms the more massive compact object, in shaping the astrophysical binary black hole (BBH) merger rate and mass distribution inferred by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA, comparing simulation outcomes from population synthesis frameworks COMPAS and SEVN. We find that the observational imprint of MRR differs qualitatively between the two models. In COMPAS, MRR systems dominate the merger rate density at high primary masses ( $\gtrsim$ 12 M$_\odot$), high secondary masses ( $\gtrsim$ 20 M$_\odot$), and high mass ratios ($q>0.6$), whereas in SEVN, MRR systems remain subdominant across the BBH mass distribution. This implies that the initially less massive star can massquerade as the observed primary black hole, such that the primary-mass distribution is not a direct tracer of the initially more massive stars, but instead a superposition of physically distinct evolutionary populations. We identify in the simulations three distinct evolutionary pathways leading to MRR systems: core-growth, in which stable mass transfer increases the helium-core mass of the secondary; PPISN-shrinking, where pulsational pair-instability episodes reduce the primary remnant mass; and asymmetric-CCSN, where differential supernova mass loss drives the reversal. When weighted by the local BBH merger-rate density, the core-growth channel dominates almost exclusively. MRR systems predominantly originate from massive ($\gtrsim$ 50 M$_\odot$), low-metallicity progenitors, with most of the systems forming below 0.1 $Z_\odot$. Our results demonstrate that MRR is a physically distinct and potentially observable feature of isolated binary evolution. Accounting for MRR will be important for robustly connecting future gravitational-wave observations to the physics of massive binary evolution and compact-object formation.2026-05-20T18:00:01Z28 pages, 16 figures, comments welcome!Tyler B. SmithFloor BroekgaardenSasha LevinaAmedeo RomagnoloManasvini KomandurMelanie SantiagoKyle A. Rochahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21574v1(LRDs)$^2$: The Low-ReDshift Little Red Dots Survey. II. DESI DR1 Sample2026-05-20T18:00:00ZJWST has revealed a substantial population of "Little Red Dots" (LRDs) at $z>4$, challenging conventional AGN frameworks. However, the low-redshift regime remains largely unexplored. In the second paper of the (LRDs)$^2$ series, we present a systematic selection from DESI DR1 and identify 27 LRDs at $z=0.2-0.9$, yielding a number density lower limit of $7.5 \times 10^{-10}$ cMpc$^{-3}$. We conducted near-IR spectroscopic follow-up observations for 18 of them, revealing their full SED shapes and emission lines. These low-$z$ LRDs share the hallmark properties of their high-$z$ counterparts: compact morphology, V-shaped UV-optical continua, broad Balmer emission with extreme decrements (median H$α$/H$β\sim 16$), frequent Balmer absorption (67%), and blackbody-like optical-to-near-IR continua. All have low metallicity, occupy the same regions in the BPT diagram as high-$z$ LRDs, and have softer ionizing spectra than typical AGNs. The consistency between low-$z$ and high-$z$ LRD properties indicates the same physical processes at work. The correlation between broad-line Balmer luminosity and $L_{5100}$ deviates from that of local type-1 AGNs, limiting the direct application of local BH mass calibrations. Ionized [O III] outflows are ubiquitous (78%). One LRD at $z=0.196$, J1717+3807, shows robust long-term variability in $i$ and WISE bands. The optical-to-NIR continua of LRDs reveal a wide range of temperatures $\sim 2000-4700$ K (peak $0.6-1.5$ $μ$m), with a subset showing cooler and larger envelopes than those at high $z$. Low-$z$ LRDs serve not only as proximate laboratories for probing the nature of LRDs, but also trace the cosmic evolution of this population from the cosmic dawn to the present day.2026-05-20T18:00:00ZMain text 28 pages; 17 figures. Submitted to the ApJ. Comments are welcome. Data are available on Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20309303Xiaojing LinXiaohui FanZheng CaiYichen LiuFengwu SunFuyan BianMingyu LiJunjie MaoJenny E. GreeneHanpu LiuJiaxuan LiWeizhe LiuYilun MaZechang SunZijian Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21576v1Investigating central star formation in local AGN host galaxies: is there tension between coeval growth and AGN feedback?2026-05-20T18:00:00ZIt has been argued that supermassive black holes (BHs) coevolve with the central parts of galaxies, as a result of the common fuel for both the BH and star formation in the galaxy central region, as supported by the particularly significant relation between BH growth and the central mass density within 1 kpc found among star-forming galaxies. In the context of this scenario, one would naturally expect a close observational link between AGN activity and star formation activity in the central regions, e.g., the surface star formation rate density in the central 1 kpc region ($Σ_{\rm SFR, 1~kpc}$), as the manifestation of coeval growth. With ~3000 galaxies in the Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory (MaNGA) survey that have X-ray coverage from SRG/eROSITA, XMM-Newton, or Chandra, we studied how the X-ray AGN fraction varies with $Σ_{\rm SFR, 1~kpc}$. We found that the fraction of X-ray AGNs with relatively higher specific BH accretion rates increases with $Σ_{\rm SFR, 1~kpc}$, consistent with the expectation. Comparison of the mean star formation rate surface density ($Σ_{\rm SFR}$) profiles of the host galaxies of these AGNs and normal galaxies sharing similar properties reveals elevated $Σ_{\rm SFR}$ in AGN hosts across the entire central region. As for optically-selected AGNs, their hosts also tend to show high $Σ_{\rm SFR}$ in the central regions on average compared to normal galaxies, but are discrepant with X-ray AGNs in terms of the trend of AGN fraction vs. $Σ_{\rm SFR, 1~kpc}$, which can be explained by selection effects. While these general trends all support the coeval growth scenario, they do not contradict observational evidence for AGN feedback, as the time-averaged effects from local AGN feedback are modest in star-forming regions.2026-05-20T18:00:00Z15 pages, 17 figures. Accepted for publication in A&AQ. NiK. NandraA. MerloniJ. ComparatD. Tubín-ArenasY. Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21342v1Euclid: Early Release Observations -- The formation of peanutty dwarf galaxies in Perseus2026-05-20T16:08:24ZDwarf galaxies in dense cluster environments are susceptible to tidal interactions that can alter their morphology and kinematics. Boxy isophotes are well studied in massive galaxies but remain poorly understood in dwarfs. We aim to identify and characterise boxy/peanutty dwarf galaxies in the Perseus cluster and determine the origin of their isophotal shapes. Using Euclid Early Release Observations of the Perseus cluster, we present a cumulative light fraction method for robustly measuring the isophotal shape parameter $c_4$, particularly suited to low surface brightness regimes. From ~1100 cataloged dwarfs, we select a clean sample of ~190 early-type systems with reliable $c_4$ measurement. Observed trends are interpreted through comparison with mock Euclid observations of $N$-body simulations of tidally transformed dwarfs. We identify 13 dwarfs with significantly boxy isophotes ($c_4 < -0.0175$). These galaxies lack visible thin disks, lie on the cluster red sequence, and show no preferential spatial concentration within Perseus. We find a significant anticorrelation between $c_4$ and effective radius: larger galaxies exhibit more boxy isophotes. An analogous size-shape anticorrelation is recovered in the simulations, where inner regions are dominated by box orbits associated with a triaxial peanut structure and outer regions by short-axis tube orbits. The boxy dwarfs in Perseus are tidally transformed remnants of moderately rotating progenitors, with boxy isophotes tracing inner box-orbit-dominated peanut structures. The size-shape correlation arises from viewing geometry: face-on orientations reveal the rectangular profile of the elongated triaxial structure (large and boxy), while edge-on views yield rounder, compact morphologies. Our sample represents an orientation-selected subset of tidally transformed, peanutty dwarfs in the cluster.2026-05-20T16:08:24Z21 pages, 18 figures, 5 tables. Submitted to A&AA. U. KapoorSterrenkundig Observatorium, Universiteit Gent, Krijgslaan 281 S9, 9000 Gent, BelgiumR. SmithDepartamento de Física, Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria, Avenida España 1680, Valparaíso, ChileMillennium Nucleus for GalaxiesA. J. ZuiderwijkSterrenkundig Observatorium, Universiteit Gent, Krijgslaan 281 S9, 9000 Gent, BelgiumS. De RijckeSterrenkundig Observatorium, Universiteit Gent, Krijgslaan 281 S9, 9000 Gent, BelgiumA. van der WelSterrenkundig Observatorium, Universiteit Gent, Krijgslaan 281 S9, 9000 Gent, BelgiumM. BaesSterrenkundig Observatorium, Universiteit Gent, Krijgslaan 281 S9, 9000 Gent, BelgiumF. R. MarleauUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Astro- und Teilchenphysik, Technikerstr. 25/8, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaP. -A. DucUniversité de Strasbourg, CNRS, Observatoire astronomique de Strasbourg, UMR 7550, 67000 Strasbourg, FranceR. F. PeletierKapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, PO Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The NetherlandsB. AltieriESAC/ESA, Camino Bajo del Castillo, s/n., Urb. Villafranca del Castillo, 28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainS. AndreonINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, 20122 Milano, ItalyN. AuricchioINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyC. BaccigalupiIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the Universe, via Beirut 2, 34151 Trieste, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyINFN, Sezione di Trieste, Via Valerio 2, 34127 Trieste TS, ItalySISSA, International School for Advanced Studies, Via Bonomea 265, 34136 Trieste TS, ItalyM. BaldiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Bologna, Via Gobetti 93/2, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyA. BalestraINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Via dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, ItalyS. BardelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyP. BattagliaINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyA. BivianoINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the Universe, via Beirut 2, 34151 Trieste, ItalyE. BranchiniDipartimento di Fisica, Università di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, 20122 Milano, ItalyM. BresciaDepartment of Physics "E. Pancini", University Federico II, Via Cinthia 6, 80126, Napoli, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Via Moiariello 16, 80131 Napoli, ItalyS. CameraDipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via P. Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Torino, Via P. Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino, Via Osservatorio 20, 10025 Pino TorineseV. CapobiancoINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino, Via Osservatorio 20, 10025 Pino TorineseC. CarboneINAF-IASF Milano, Via Alfonso Corti 12, 20133 Milano, ItalyJ. CarreteroCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y TecnológicasPort d'Informació Científica, Campus UAB, C. Albareda s/n, 08193 BellaterraM. CastellanoINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, 00078 Monteporzio Catone, ItalyG. CastignaniINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyS. CavuotiINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Via Moiariello 16, 80131 Napoli, ItalyINFN section of Naples, Via Cinthia 6, 80126, Napoli, ItalyK. C. ChambersInstitute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USAA. CimattiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "Augusto Righi" - Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyC. Colodro-CondeInstituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, E-38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, SpainG. CongedoInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UKC. J. ConseliceJodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UKL. ConversiEuropean Space Agency/ESRIN, Largo Galileo Galilei 1, 00044 Frascati, Roma, ItalyESAC/ESA, Camino Bajo del Castillo, s/n., Urb. Villafranca del Castillo, 28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainY. CopinUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822, Villeurbanne, F-69100, FranceF. CourbinInstitut de Ciències del CosmosInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsInstitut de Ciencies de l'EspaiH. M. CourtoisUCB Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IUF, IP2I Lyon, 4 rue Enrico Fermi, 69622 Villeurbanne, FranceM. CropperMullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St Mary, Dorking, Surrey RH5 6NT, UKH. DegaudenziDepartment of Astronomy, University of Geneva, ch. d'Ecogia 16, 1290 Versoix, SwitzerlandG. De LuciaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyH. DoleUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut d'astrophysique spatiale, 91405, Orsay, FranceF. DubathDepartment of Astronomy, University of Geneva, ch. d'Ecogia 16, 1290 Versoix, SwitzerlandX. DupacESAC/ESA, Camino Bajo del Castillo, s/n., Urb. Villafranca del Castillo, 28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainM. FabriciusMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, GermanyM. FarinaINAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, via del Fosso del Cavaliere, 100, 00100 Roma, ItalyR. FarinelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyS. FerriolUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822, Villeurbanne, F-69100, FranceM. FrailisINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyS. GaleottaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyK. GeorgeUniversity Observatory, LMU Faculty of Physics, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 Munich, GermanyB. GillisInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UKC. GiocoliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyJ. Gracia-CarpioMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyA. GrazianINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Via dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, ItalyF. GruppMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, GermanyS. V. H. HauganInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1029 Blindern, 0315 Oslo, NorwayJ. HoarESAC/ESA, Camino Bajo del Castillo, s/n., Urb. Villafranca del Castillo, 28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainW. HolmesJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA, 91109, USAI. M. HookDepartment of Physics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YB, UKF. HormuthFelix Hormuth Engineering, Goethestr. 17, 69181 Leimen, GermanyA. HornstrupTechnical University of Denmark, Elektrovej 327, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, DenmarkCosmic Dawn CenterK. JahnkeMax-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, GermanyM. JhabvalaNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USAS. KermicheAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, FranceA. KiesslingJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA, 91109, USAB. KubikUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822, Villeurbanne, F-69100, FranceM. KümmelUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, GermanyM. KunzUniversité de Genève, Département de Physique Théorique and Centre for Astroparticle Physics, 24 quai Ernest-Ansermet, CH-1211 Genève 4, SwitzerlandH. Kurki-SuonioDepartment of Physics, P.O. Box 64, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandHelsinki Institute of Physics, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandA. M. C. Le BrunLaboratoire d'etude de l'Univers et des phenomenes eXtremes, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 92190 Meudon, FranceS. LigoriINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino, Via Osservatorio 20, 10025 Pino TorineseP. B. LiljeInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1029 Blindern, 0315 Oslo, NorwayV. LindholmDepartment of Physics, P.O. Box 64, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandHelsinki Institute of Physics, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandI. LloroSKAO, Jodrell Bank, Lower Withington, Macclesfield SK11 9FT, UKG. MainettiCentre de Calcul de l'IN2P3/CNRS, 21 avenue Pierre de Coubertin 69627 Villeurbanne Cedex, FranceO. MansuttiINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyO. MarggrafUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, GermanyM. MartinelliINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, 00078 Monteporzio Catone, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 2 - c/o Dipartimento di Fisica, Edificio G. Marconi, 00185 Roma, ItalyN. MartinetAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAM, Marseille, FranceF. MarulliDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "Augusto Righi" - Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, via Piero Gobetti 93/2, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyR. J. MasseyDepartment of Physics, Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UKE. MedinaceliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyS. MeiUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Astroparticule et Cosmologie, 75013 Paris, FranceCNRS-UCB International Research Laboratory, Centre Pierre Binétruy, IRL2007, CPB-IN2P3, Berkeley, USAM. MeneghettiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyE. MerlinINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Via dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, ItalyG. MeylanInstitute of Physics, Laboratory of Astrophysics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneA. MoraTelespazio UK S.L. for European Space AgencyM. MorescoDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "Augusto Righi" - Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, via Piero Gobetti 93/2, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyL. MoscardiniDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "Augusto Righi" - Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, via Piero Gobetti 93/2, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyR. NakajimaUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, GermanyC. NeissnerInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesPort d'Informació Científica, Campus UAB, C. Albareda s/n, 08193 BellaterraS. -M. NiemiEuropean Space Agency/ESTEC, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, The NetherlandsC. PadillaInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesS. PaltaniDepartment of Astronomy, University of Geneva, ch. d'Ecogia 16, 1290 Versoix, SwitzerlandF. PasianINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyK. PedersenDARK, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 155, 2200 Copenhagen, DenmarkW. J. PercivalWaterloo Centre for Astrophysics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, CanadaDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, CanadaPerimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2Y5, CanadaV. PettorinoEuropean Space Agency/ESTEC, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, The NetherlandsG. PolentaSpace Science Data Center, Italian Space Agency, via del Politecnico snc, 00133 Roma, ItalyM. PoncetCentre National d'Etudes Spatiales -- Centre spatial de Toulouse, 18 avenue Edouard Belin, 31401 Toulouse Cedex 9, FranceL. A. PopaInstitute of Space Science, Str. Atomistilor, nr. 409 Măgurele, Ilfov, 077125, RomaniaF. RaisonMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyA. RenziDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "G. Galilei", Università di Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyINFN-Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyJ. RhodesJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA, 91109, USAG. RiccioINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Via Moiariello 16, 80131 Napoli, ItalyE. RomelliINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyM. RoncarelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyR. SagliaUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, GermanyMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyZ. SakrInstituto de Física Teórica UAM-CSIC, Campus de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, SpainInstitut de Recherche en Astrophysique et PlanétologieUniversité St Joseph, Faculty of Sciences, Beirut, LebanonD. SaponeDepartamento de Física, FCFM, Universidad de Chile, Blanco Encalada 2008, Santiago, ChileP. SchneiderUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, GermanyA. SecrounAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, FranceE. SihvolaDepartment of Physics and Helsinki Institute of Physics, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandP. SimonUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, GermanyC. SirignanoDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "G. Galilei", Università di Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyINFN-Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyG. SirriINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyL. StancoINFN-Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyP. Tallada-CrespíCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y TecnológicasPort d'Informació Científica, Campus UAB, C. Albareda s/n, 08193 BellaterraA. N. TaylorInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UKI. TerenoDepartamento de Física, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Edifício C8, Campo Grande, PT1749-016 Lisboa, PortugalInstituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do Espaço, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-018 Lisboa, PortugalS. ToftCosmic Dawn CenterNiels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 128, 2200 Copenhagen, DenmarkR. Toledo-MoreoUniversidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Departamento de Electrónica y Tecnología de Computadoras, Plaza del Hospital 1, 30202 Cartagena, SpainEuropean University of Technology EUt+, European UnionF. TorradeflotPort d'Informació Científica, Campus UAB, C. Albareda s/n, 08193 BellaterraCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y TecnológicasI. TutusausInstitute of Space SciencesInstitut d'Estudis Espacials de CatalunyaInstitut de Recherche en Astrophysique et PlanétologieJ. ValiviitaDepartment of Physics, P.O. Box 64, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandHelsinki Institute of Physics, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, FinlandT. VassalloINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyUniversity Observatory, LMU Faculty of Physics, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 Munich, GermanyA. VeropalumboINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, 20122 Milano, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyDipartimento di Fisica, Università di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyY. WangCaltech/IPAC, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, CA 91125, USAJ. WellerUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstr. 1, 81679 München, GermanyMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyG. ZamoraniINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyF. M. ZerbiINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, 20122 Milano, ItalyI. A. ZinchenkoAstronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg, Mönchhofstr. 12-14, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyE. ZuccaINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyM. MagliocchettiINAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, via del Fosso del Cavaliere, 100, 00100 Roma, ItalyM. SerenoINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyF. DurretInstitut d'Astrophysique de Paris, 98bis Boulevard Arago, 75014, Paris, FranceD. ScottDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canadahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21320v1FR0 radio galaxy jets -- I. linking jet dynamics and high-energy emission in LEDA 55267 and LEDA 582872026-05-20T15:49:14ZFanaroff-Riley type 0 (FR0) radio galaxies host anomalously compact jets whose disruption mechanism and high-energy emission remain poorly understood. We combine three-dimensional relativistic hydrodynamical (RHD) simulations with broadband spectral energy distribution (SED) modeling from radio to TeV energies, focusing on LEDA~55267 and LEDA~58287. Our simulations show that recollimation shocks trigger hydrodynamical instabilities that drive turbulence and rapid deceleration, preventing the jets from propagating beyond a few tens of parsecs and reproducing the observed compact radio morphology. Leptonic SED models adequately describe the observed emission up to GeV energies, but when simulated CTAO observations are included, statistical model comparison indicates strong evidence in favor of lepto-hadronic scenarios at TeV energies for both sources, a result that should be interpreted as a theoretical prediction to be tested by future observations. A leptonic analysis of the simulations reveals magnetized emitting regions with plasma beta parameters $β_{\rm p} \sim 10^{-5}$-$10^{-3}$, orders of magnitude below values reported for extended FRI jets, consistent with jets retaining the magnetization inherited from the launching region and providing a natural physical link between the compact jet dynamics and the lepto-hadronic emission.2026-05-20T15:49:14ZAccepted for publication in MNRASAndré F. S. CardosoRita C. Anjoshttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21289v1On the Possibility of an Extragalactic Positron Annihilation Signal2026-05-20T15:23:50ZWith 20 years of INTEGRAL/SPI observations, Yoneda et al. (2025) created the most detailed map of the positron annihilation line at 511keV. While central bulge and extended disk are readily recognised in this map, several hotspots at high latitude regions may either be imaging artefacts or true signals. We discuss the possibility of extragalactic positron annihilation signals from hotspots in this map. We also calculate a cosmological positron annihilation signal as a contribution to the Cosmic Gamma-ray Background (CGB). For this investigation, we compare 511 keV emission hotspots away from the Galactic plane with a high velocity cloud column density map as well as with the catalogue of Local Volume Galaxies (LVGs) up to 25 Mpc. We find that in particular the Magellanic Stream in the southern and Complex C in the northern sky matches the brightest hotspots, which may indicate a higher positron production rate inside the Milky Way than measured from the Galactic interstellar medium alone, of $10^{44}\,\mathrm{s^{-1}}$. In addition, we can explain other hotspots by the cumulative effect of LVGs in the selected regions. The CGB contribution from positron annihilation might be sub-dominant on the per-cent level. However, depending on the true intrinsic annihilation spectrum, in particular depending on the positron injection energy for in-flight annihilation and the star formation rate per galaxy, a much higher imprint beyond 10% is possible above several MeV. If these findings turn out to be true, next generation MeV telescopes will, for the first time, identify individual extragalactic 511 keV sources. In particular, several dwarf spheroidal galaxies with fluxes of up to $(1$-$2) \times 10^{-5}\,\mathrm{ph\,cm^{-2}\,s^{-1}}$, the galaxies M31 and M33, as well as some of their satellites, with potentially several $10^{-6}\,\mathrm{ph\,cm^{-2}\,s^{-1}}$, each, may be detected.2026-05-20T15:23:50Z8 pages, 7 figures, 2 tables, accepted in A&AThomas SiegertHiroki Yonedahttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21281v1Self-Consistent Parker Bound on Magnetic Monopoles2026-05-20T15:12:21ZMagnetic monopoles arise generically in unified theories and offer a natural explanation of charge quantization. Beyond collider searches and cosmic-ray experiments, their flux is constrained by Parker-type bounds requiring galactic magnetic fields to survive monopole energy extraction. We formulate a self-consistent Parker bound anchored in the lowest eigenmode of the galactic mean-field dynamo and convert the resulting limit to the present flux. Small-scale turbulent fields both seed this eigenmode and set the monopole velocity via stochastic acceleration before energy extraction from the coherent field. These unavoidable effects substantially modify the standard extended Parker bound at low and intermediate masses, yielding flux limits robust to primordial magnetic fields (PMFs); PMFs strong enough to alter them lie in regimes constrained by Ly$α$ data or testable by 21-cm and cosmological probes.2026-05-20T15:12:21Z10 pages, 3 figuresChen ZhangChun-Yan JiangNayun JiaXin Zhanghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2603.25848v2The Hubble Missing Globular Cluster Survey. III. Astro-photometric catalogs, artificial-star tests, and improved absolute proper motions2026-05-20T14:38:12ZThe Hubble Missing Globular Cluster Survey (MGCS) has taken one of the last opportunities to complete the census of Galactic globular clusters (GCs) started by past Hubble Space Telescope (HST) programs, securing high-resolution data for 34 GCs never observed before by HST. The previous papers in the series have highlighted the astrometric and photometric potential of the project by analyzing a subsample of targets. We present, and release to the community, the official astro-photometric catalogs of the MGCS for all GCs imaged by this project. We describe the data reduction using state-of-the-art techniques designed for HST. We discuss the photometric calibration and show, for the first time, the synergy with the Gaia catalog to ensure homogeneous photometry across our data set. We compute artificial-star tests that can be used to assess systematics and the completeness level of our data. We combined HST and Gaia data to refine the absolute proper motions of our GCs, reaching a precision $\sim$3 times better than that of Gaia alone. We used these new proper motions to update (and to determine for the first time for five systems) the associations between GCs and their putative galaxy progenitors. This work continues decades-long efforts of large Treasury programs in sharing precise and accurate atlases to the community for studying GCs across a wide range of scientific endeavors.2026-03-26T19:14:41Z12 pages, 9 figures, 6 tables. Accepted for publication in A&A. Data products available at the CDS ( https://cdsarc.cds.unistra.fr/viz-bin/cat/J/A+A/709/A140 ) and at our MGCS website ( https://www.oas.inaf.it/en/research/m2-en/mgcs-en/ )M. LibralatoA. BelliniD. MassariM. BellazziniF. Aguado-AgeletS. CassisiE. CeccarelliE. DalessandroE. DoddF. R. FerraroC. GallartB. LanzoniM. MonelliA. MucciarelliE. PancinoR. PascaleL. RosignoliM. SalarisS. SaracinoC. Zerbinatihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21212v1Detection of a dark matter subhalo in the strongly lensed system PJ0116462026-05-20T14:07:43ZWe present a strong lensing analysis of the system PJ011646 using high-resolution ($\sim$0.1 arcsec) Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) dust-continuum observations to test for the presence of dark matter substructures. The lens mass distribution is modelled with an elliptical power law and third- and fourth-order multipoles (PL+MP; $m=3,4$), plus external shear. The multipoles have amplitudes of $\simeq$1.5 per cent of the convergence, consistent with nearby early-type galaxies, and improve the fit by $Δ\ln Z = 52.1$ relative to a pure PL model. Using this best-fitting macromodel, we perform a grid-based subhalo search in the image plane, parametrising the perturber as a spherical NFW. A subhalo in two locations in the image plane improves the fit by $Δ\ln Z>10$. Both correspond to the same location in the source plane, so they are partially degenerate; follow-up analysis suggests that only one is physically real. This is a subhalo of mass $M_{200} = {2.78}_{-0.66}^{+0.43} \times 10^{10} \, M_\odot$ and concentration $c_{200} = 30_{-7}^{+5}$, detected at $\sim$5.8$σ$ significance (relative to the PL+MP). This concentration is consistent with that expected for a typical tidally stripped Navarro-Frenk-White subhalo. The enclosed projected mass is most tightly constrained within a radius of 2 kpc, where we infer $M_{\rm sub} = {3.57}_{-0.14}^{+0.16}\times 10^9 \, M_\odot$. From grid cells consistent with no detection ($Δ\ln Z < 10$), we derive limits on the minimum subhalo mass that could have been detected at $3σ$ significance, finding $M_{200} \approx 8 \times 10^{8} \, M_\odot$ in the most sensitive regions of the lensed arcs. This demonstrates that ALMA continuum imaging at sub-arcsecond resolution can probe dark matter substructure in a mass regime where cold and warm dark matter models predict different abundances of subhalos.2026-05-20T14:07:43Z12 pages, 6 figuresAristeidis AmvrosiadisJames W. NightingaleQiuhan HeAndrew RobertsonShaun ColeCarlos S. FrenkSamuel LangeRichard MasseyMaximilian von Wietersheim-KramstaXiaoyue CaoRan LiShubo LiKaihao WangXianghao MaLeo W. H. Funghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21353v2The MeerKAT 1.3 GHz Survey of the Large Magellanic Cloud2026-05-20T13:43:26ZWe present a radio-continuum survey of the LMC using the MeerKAT telescope, describe the full-Stokes products included in the first data release, and highlight some initial results. The observations are centred at 1.3 GHz with a bandwidth of 0.8 GHz. The imaging products comprise six fields of view, each encompassing $\sim$5$^\circ$ $\times$ 5$^\circ$ with the resulting images achieving a resolution of 8". The median broad-band Stokes~I image root-mean-square noise value is $\sim$11 $μ$Jy beam$^{-1}$. The survey enables a variety of astrophysical studies, which we showcase with the presentation of a few findings. Within the LMC we identify a new supernova remnant candidate; present planetary nebulae and Wolf-Rayet stars without previous radio detections; and show the MeerKAT view of the well-known star-forming region 30 Doradus. We also present some examples of interesting foreground and background sources in the field, including the AB~Dor multiple-star system, a radio ring galaxy, a possible Odd Radio Circle, and a remarkable bent-tail radio galaxy.2026-02-24T20:38:47Z15 pages, 14 figures, accepted by MNRASW. D. CottonN. RajabpourM. D. FilipovićF. CamiloR. Z. E. AlsaberiL. H. BesterA. C. BradleyE. J. CrawfordM. GhavamO. K. KhattabZ. J. SmeatonO. M. SmirnovJ. Th. van LoonV. Velovićhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2509.19239v2Recalibration of the H$α$ surface brightness-radius relation for planetary nebulae using Gaia DR3: new distances and the Milky Way oxygen radial gradient2026-05-20T13:39:06ZThe spatial distribution of chemical elements in the Galactic disk provides key constraints on models of galaxy evolution. However, studies using planetary nebulae (PNe) as tracers have been historically limited by large uncertainties in their distances. To overcome the long-standing distance uncertainties, we recalibrated the H$α$ surface brightness-radius relation from Frew et al. with Gaia DR3 parallaxes, deriving distances for 1,130 PNe of which 415 have Bayesian distances based on Gaia DR3 parallaxes. The O/H radial gradient for 231 disk PNe is fitted considering three models: a single linear gradient and segmented linear fits with one or two breaks. The segmented fits indicate a change in slope near the solar radius (R ~8 kpc), with a flatter or slightly positive gradient inward and a steeper negative gradient outward. This feature may reflect changes in star formation efficiency driven by the Galactic bar or the corotation resonance of the spiral arms. The breaks in the metallicity radial gradients observed in this work may result from the superposition of distinct stellar populations associated with the thin and thick disks. The two-dimensional O/H distribution in the Galactic plane supports the adopted distances and reveals modest azimuthal asymmetry, with enhanced abundances near the bar at positive longitudes, and a bimodal abundance structure between the inner and outer solar regions. Our results provide new constraints on the chemical evolution of the Milky Way, the impact of non-axisymmetric structures, and the possible existence of distinct radial abundance regimes across the Galactic disk.2025-09-23T17:00:39Z26 pages, 15 figures and 5 tables. Accepted for publication in ApJOscar CavichiaHektor MonteiroMiguel CerviñoAdalberto R. da Cunha-SilvaWalter J. MacielAndré F. S. Cardosohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2604.17516v4Kardashev's Conundrum: Statistical Falsification of the Standard Kardashev Model and the Kardashev--Sagan--Nakamoto Resolution2026-05-20T13:12:36ZWe test the standard Kardashev one-percent exponential conjecture against six decades of global primary-energy production data (1965-2024; Our World in Data). Markov Chain Monte Carlo inference yields a posterior growth rate of r = 2.01 +/- 0.03% per year (95% credible interval [1.94%, 2.08%]), placing the Kardashev 1% value well outside the credible interval. A linear OLS model fits the data with remarkably low dispersion (R^2 = 0.987) and is preferred over the free-rate exponential by the Widely Applicable Information Criterion (ΔWAIC = 5.5). Year-over-year increments are non-Gaussian (Shapiro-Wilk W = 0.925, p = 0.0014; skewness = -0.664) with identifiable crisis outliers (2008, 2020), rejecting the independent-increment multiplicative structure with positive drift required by Kardashev's (1+x)^t geometric series. Extrapolation of the linear model to the solar luminosity yields a Type II civilisational timescale of approximately 1.6E15 years -- approximately 1E5 times both the age of the Universe and the main-sequence lifetime of the Sun -- a physical reductio we term Kardashev's Conundrum. No functional form fitted to P(t) alone can simultaneously satisfy statistical adequacy and physical coherence: the Kardashev variable is dimensionally incomplete. We propose the Kardashev-Sagan-Nakamoto (KSN) renormalisation B(t) = P(t)/H(t) [J/Hash, the KarNak unit], where H(t) is the annual Bitcoin hashrate. The renormalisation adds no free parameters, is motivated by the Landauer limit, and fulfils Sagan's information-richness requirement. Over 2009-2024, B(t) spans 14 orders of magnitude.2026-04-19T16:19:28Z12 pages, 4 figures, 2 tables, shorter version submitted to MNRAS Letters. v4: engages with recent technosphere-projection literature; restructured introductionSebastian Gurovichhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.21106v1Multi-diagnostic convergence: a single measurement in weakly collisional plasmas2026-05-20T12:36:45ZWhen multiple electron temperature diagnostics converge on the same value, the standard inference is that the measurement is robust. We show that this convergence is a structural consequence of the shared ionization bottleneck in any plasma where the electron Knudsen number exceeds $\sim 0.01$: all diagnostics downstream of collisional ionization report the effective temperature $T_{\rm eff}$, not the core temperature $T_{\rm core}$. Their agreement is a single measurement reported $N$ times. We introduce a taxonomy: Type A (ionization-gated, $T_{\rm eff}$), Type B (bulk-sampling, $T_{\rm core}$), Type C (distribution-resolving). The ratio $R = T_A/T_B$ yields $κ= 3R/[2(R-1)]$ directly. Applied to the solar corona ($R = 2.4$, $κ\approx 2.5$) and the tokamak scrape-off layer, single kappa distributions ($κ\approx 2$--$10$) reproduce published bi-Maxwellian EEDF decompositions to 3--8\% RMS with one fewer parameter, and Thomson scattering confirms the predicted Type B temperature. We test applicability in planetary nebulae (the 80-year CEL--ORL abundance discrepancy). Knudsen calculations with the Shoub $v^4$ mean-free-path scaling show ionizing electrons are collisionless in the corona even when the bulk is fluid; in PNe, both ionizing ($\sim 55$ eV) and excitation ($\sim 5$ eV) electrons are collisional over nebular scales, identifying PNe as the falsification boundary; in the SOL, non-local parallel transport maintains tails even where local collisionality is high. For $κ\approx 3$--$5$, the raw Spitzer--Härm formula with spectroscopic $T_e$ overestimates parallel heat flux by factors of 3--25$\times$; flux-limited models inherit the bias through their boundary conditions, relevant to ITER divertor predictions. Every diagnostic campaign on a weakly collisional plasma should include at least one Type B measurement.2026-05-20T12:36:45ZOpen Transport 1 (2026) 20260011Victor Edmonds10.1515/ot-2026-0011