https://arxiv.org/api/viZ06/NSbkS2x8OqnZeufs7vS3c2026-06-21T22:03:11Z7740466015http://arxiv.org/abs/2603.05930v2Controlled Experiments on Dark-Matter Halo Structure and Galaxy Morphology I: What Sets Galaxy Sizes?2026-05-27T11:28:40ZThe properties of galaxies are intricately linked to the characteristics of their host dark-matter haloes. We use a suite of controlled simulations of isolated galaxies to quantify how halo spin, concentration, inner density profile, and baryon fraction regulate galaxy sizes, at fixed halo mass of $M_{\rm{vir}}=10^{11} M_\odot$. We generate initial conditions of haloes and inhabitant spherical gas distributions in equilibrium, on a parameter grid spanned by these four halo parameters, and evolve the systems with the $\texttt{GIZMO}$ code and the $\texttt{FIRE-3}$ physics. The resulting half-mass radii of stars and cold baryons depend systematically on halo structure and baryon content: galaxy size increases with halo spin, decreases with halo concentration, is weakly sensitive to the inner density slope except in highly cuspy haloes, and is strongly suppressed at high baryon fractions. We evaluate the relative importance of the halo parameters on galaxy size using different metrics including the quadratic response-surface method and random-forest regression, and consistently find halo concentration to be the most informative predictor of size. The baryon fraction shows a subtle, non-monotonic impact on size, by modulating how galaxy size depends on halo spin. Our results clarify which secondary parameters of host dark-matter haloes dominate the scatter in galaxy sizes at the massive-dwarf mass scale.2026-03-06T05:56:39Z16 pages, 8 figures. Submitted to MNRASMon Not R Astron Soc (2026)Guangze SunPeking UniversityFangzhou JiangPeking UniversityJing WangPeking University10.1093/mnras/stag997http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.10416v3Euclid: Photometric redshift calibration with the clustering redshifts technique2026-05-27T10:48:47ZAims: The precision of cosmological constraints from imaging surveys hinges on accurately estimating the redshift distribution $ n(z) $ of tomographic bins, especially their mean redshifts. We assess the effectiveness of the clustering redshifts technique in constraining Euclid tomographic redshift bins to meet the target uncertainty of $ σ( \langle z \rangle ) < 0.002 (1 + z) $. In this work, these mean redshifts are inferred from the small-scale angular clustering of Euclid galaxies, which are distributed into bins with spectroscopic samples localised in narrow redshift slices.
Methods: We generate spectroscopic mocks from the Flagship2 simulation for the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), and Euclid's Near-Infrared Spectrometer and Photometer (NISP) spectroscopic survey. We evaluate and optimise the clustering redshifts pipeline, introducing a new method for measuring photometric galaxy bias (clustering), which is the primary limitation of this technique.
Results: We have successfully constrained the means and standard deviations of the redshift distributions for all of the tomographic bins (with a maximum photometric redshift of 1.6), achieving precision beyond the required thresholds. We have identified the main sources of bias, particularly the impact of the 1-halo galaxy distribution, which imposed a minimal separation scale of 1.5 Mpc for evaluating cross-correlations. These results demonstrate the potential of clustering redshifts to meet the precision requirements for Euclid, and we highlight several avenues for future improvements.2025-05-15T15:35:01Z31 pages, 24 figures, 2 tablesA&A 702, A155 (2025)W. d'AssigniesInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesM. ManeraSerra Húnter Fellow, Departament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Bellaterra, SpainInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesC. PadillaInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesO. IlbertAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAM, Marseille, FranceH. HildebrandtRuhr University Bochum, Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Astronomical InstituteL. ReynoldsInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesDepartament de Física, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 BellaterraJ. Chaves-MonteroInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesA. H. WrightRuhr University Bochum, Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Astronomical InstituteP. Tallada-CrespíCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y TecnológicasPort d'Informació Científica, Campus UAB, C. Albareda s/n, 08193 BellaterraM. EriksenInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesPort d'Informació Científica, Campus UAB, C. Albareda s/n, 08193 BellaterraJ. CarreteroCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y TecnológicasPort d'Informació Científica, Campus UAB, C. Albareda s/n, 08193 BellaterraW. RosterMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyY. KangDepartment of Astronomy, University of Geneva, ch. d'Ecogia 16, 1290 Versoix, SwitzerlandK. NaidooInstitute of Cosmology and Gravitation, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3FX, UKR. MiquelInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsB. AltieriESAC/ESA, Camino Bajo del Castillo, s/n., Urb. Villafranca del Castillo, 28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainA. AmaraSchool of Mathematics and Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XH, UKS. AndreonINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, 20122 Milano, ItalyN. AuricchioINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyC. BaccigalupiIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the Universe, via Beirut 2, 34151 Trieste, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyINFN, Sezione di Trieste, Via Valerio 2, 34127 Trieste TS, ItalySISSA, International School for Advanced Studies, Via Bonomea 265, 34136 Trieste TS, ItalyD. BagotCentre National d'Etudes Spatiales -- Centre spatial de Toulouse, 18 avenue Edouard Belin, 31401 Toulouse Cedex 9, FranceM. BaldiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Bologna, Via Gobetti 93/2, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyA. BalestraINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Via dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, ItalyS. BardelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyP. BattagliaINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyA. BivianoINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the Universe, via Beirut 2, 34151 Trieste, ItalyE. BranchiniDipartimento di Fisica, Università di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, 20122 Milano, ItalyM. BresciaDepartment of Physics "E. Pancini", University Federico II, Via Cinthia 6, 80126, Napoli, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Via Moiariello 16, 80131 Napoli, ItalyS. CameraDipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via P. Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Torino, Via P. Giuria 1, 10125 Torino, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino, Via Osservatorio 20, 10025 Pino TorineseV. CapobiancoINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino, Via Osservatorio 20, 10025 Pino TorineseC. CarboneINAF-IASF Milano, Via Alfonso Corti 12, 20133 Milano, ItalyV. F. CardoneINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, 00078 Monteporzio Catone, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 2 - c/o Dipartimento di Fisica, Edificio G. Marconi, 00185 Roma, ItalyS. CasasInstitute for Theoretical Particle Physics and CosmologyF. J. CastanderInstitute of Space SciencesInstitut d'Estudis Espacials de CatalunyaM. CastellanoINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, 00078 Monteporzio Catone, ItalyG. CastignaniINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyS. CavuotiINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Via Moiariello 16, 80131 Napoli, ItalyINFN section of Naples, Via Cinthia 6, 80126, Napoli, ItalyK. C. ChambersInstitute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USAA. CimattiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "Augusto Righi" - Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyC. Colodro-CondeInstituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Vía Láctea, 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, SpainG. CongedoInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UKC. J. ConseliceJodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UKL. ConversiEuropean Space Agency/ESRIN, Largo Galileo Galilei 1, 00044 Frascati, Roma, ItalyESAC/ESA, Camino Bajo del Castillo, s/n., Urb. Villafranca del Castillo, 28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainY. CopinUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822, Villeurbanne, F-69100, FranceF. CourbinInstitut de Ciències del CosmosInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsH. M. CourtoisUCB Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IUF, IP2I Lyon, 4 rue Enrico Fermi, 69622 Villeurbanne, FranceM. CrocceInstitute of Space SciencesInstitut d'Estudis Espacials de CatalunyaA. Da SilvaDepartamento de Física, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Edifício C8, Campo Grande, PT1749-016 Lisboa, PortugalInstituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do Espaço, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, PortugalH. DegaudenziDepartment of Astronomy, University of Geneva, ch. d'Ecogia 16, 1290 Versoix, SwitzerlandS. de la TorreAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAM, Marseille, FranceG. De LuciaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyM. DouspisUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut d'astrophysique spatiale, 91405, Orsay, FranceX. DupacESAC/ESA, Camino Bajo del Castillo, s/n., Urb. Villafranca del Castillo, 28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainA. EaletUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822, Villeurbanne, F-69100, FranceS. EscoffierAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, FranceM. FarinaINAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, via del Fosso del Cavaliere, 100, 00100 Roma, ItalyF. FaustiniINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, 00078 Monteporzio Catone, ItalySpace Science Data Center, Italian Space Agency, via del Politecnico snc, 00133 Roma, ItalyS. FerriolUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822, Villeurbanne, F-69100, FranceF. FinelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Bologna, Via Irnerio 46, 40126 Bologna, ItalyP. FosalbaInstitut d'Estudis Espacials de CatalunyaInstitute of Space SciencesS. FotopoulouSchool of Physics, HH Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TL, UKM. FrailisINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyE. FranceschiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyM. FumanaINAF-IASF Milano, Via Alfonso Corti 12, 20133 Milano, ItalyS. GaleottaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyK. GeorgeUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstrasse 1, 81679 München, GermanyB. GillisInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UKC. GiocoliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyP. Gómez-AlvarezFRACTAL S.L.N.E., calle Tulipán 2, Portal 13 1A, 28231, Las Rozas de Madrid, SpainESAC/ESA, Camino Bajo del Castillo, s/n., Urb. Villafranca del Castillo, 28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, SpainJ. Gracia-CarpioMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyA. GrazianINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Via dell'Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, ItalyF. GruppMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstrasse 1, 81679 München, GermanyW. HolmesJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA, 91109, USAI. M. HookDepartment of Physics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YB, UKA. HornstrupTechnical University of Denmark, Elektrovej 327, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, DenmarkCosmic Dawn CenterK. JahnkeMax-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, GermanyM. JhabvalaNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USAB. JoachimiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UKE. KeihänenDepartment of Physics and Helsinki Institute of Physics, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, 00014 University of Helsinki, FinlandS. KermicheAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, FranceA. KiesslingJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA, 91109, USAB. KubikUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822, Villeurbanne, F-69100, FranceM. KümmelUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstrasse 1, 81679 München, GermanyM. KunzUniversité de Genève, Département de Physique Théorique and Centre for Astroparticle Physics, 24 quai Ernest-Ansermet, CH-1211 Genève 4, SwitzerlandH. Kurki-SuonioDepartment of Physics, P.O. Box 64, 00014 University of Helsinki, FinlandHelsinki Institute of Physics, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandO. LahavDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UKA. M. C. Le BrunLaboratoire d'etude de l'Univers et des phenomenes eXtremes, Observatoire de Paris, Université PSL, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, 92190 Meudon, FranceS. LigoriINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino, Via Osservatorio 20, 10025 Pino TorineseP. B. LiljeInstitute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1029 Blindern, 0315 Oslo, NorwayV. LindholmDepartment of Physics, P.O. Box 64, 00014 University of Helsinki, FinlandHelsinki Institute of Physics, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandI. LloroSKA Observatory, Jodrell Bank, Lower Withington, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK11 9FT, UKG. MainettiCentre de Calcul de l'IN2P3/CNRS, 21 avenue Pierre de Coubertin 69627 Villeurbanne Cedex, FranceD. MainoDipartimento di Fisica "Aldo Pontremoli", Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, ItalyINAF-IASF Milano, Via Alfonso Corti 12, 20133 Milano, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Milano, Via Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, ItalyE. MaioranoINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyO. MansuttiINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyS. MarcinUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts of Northwestern Switzerland, School of Computer Science, 5210 Windisch, SwitzerlandO. MarggrafUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, GermanyK. MarkovicJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA, 91109, USAM. MartinelliINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, 00078 Monteporzio Catone, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro, 2 - c/o Dipartimento di Fisica, Edificio G. Marconi, 00185 Roma, ItalyN. MartinetAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAM, Marseille, FranceF. MarulliDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "Augusto Righi" - Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, via Piero Gobetti 93/2, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyR. MasseyDepartment of Physics, Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UKD. C. MastersInfrared Processing and Analysis Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USAE. MedinaceliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyS. MeiUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Astroparticule et Cosmologie, 75013 Paris, FranceCNRS-UCB International Research Laboratory, Centre Pierre Binétruy, IRL2007, CPB-IN2P3, Berkeley, USAM. MelchiorUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts of Northwestern Switzerland, School of Engineering, 5210 Windisch, SwitzerlandY. MellierInstitut d'Astrophysique de Paris, 98bis Boulevard Arago, 75014, Paris, FranceInstitut d'Astrophysique de Paris, UMR 7095, CNRS, and Sorbonne Université, 98 bis boulevard Arago, 75014 Paris, FranceM. MeneghettiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyE. MerlinINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Via Frascati 33, 00078 Monteporzio Catone, ItalyG. MeylanInstitute of Physics, Laboratory of Astrophysics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneA. MoraTelespazio UK S.L. for European Space AgencyM. MorescoDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "Augusto Righi" - Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, via Piero Gobetti 93/2, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyL. MoscardiniDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "Augusto Righi" - Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna, via Piero Gobetti 93/2, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyC. NeissnerInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesPort d'Informació Científica, Campus UAB, C. Albareda s/n, 08193 BellaterraS. -M. NiemiEuropean Space Agency/ESTEC, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, The NetherlandsS. PaltaniDepartment of Astronomy, University of Geneva, ch. d'Ecogia 16, 1290 Versoix, SwitzerlandF. PasianINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyK. PedersenDARK, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 155, 2200 Copenhagen, DenmarkV. PettorinoEuropean Space Agency/ESTEC, Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk, The NetherlandsS. PiresUniversité Paris-Saclay, Université Paris Cité, CEA, CNRS, AIM, 91191, Gif-sur-Yvette, FranceG. PolentaSpace Science Data Center, Italian Space Agency, via del Politecnico snc, 00133 Roma, ItalyM. PoncetCentre National d'Etudes Spatiales -- Centre spatial de Toulouse, 18 avenue Edouard Belin, 31401 Toulouse Cedex 9, FranceL. A. PopaInstitute of Space Science, Str. Atomistilor, nr. 409 Măgurele, Ilfov, 077125, RomaniaL. PozzettiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyF. RaisonMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyR. ReboloInstituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, Vía Láctea, 38205 La Laguna, Tenerife, SpainConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas, Calle Serrano 117, 28006 Madrid, SpainUniversidad de La Laguna, Departamento de Astrofísica, 38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, SpainA. RenziDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "G. Galilei", Università di Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyINFN-Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyJ. RhodesJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA, 91109, USAG. RiccioINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Capodimonte, Via Moiariello 16, 80131 Napoli, ItalyE. RomelliINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyM. RoncarelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyE. RossettiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Bologna, Via Gobetti 93/2, 40129 Bologna, ItalyR. SagliaUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstrasse 1, 81679 München, GermanyMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyZ. SakrInstitut für Theoretische Physik, University of Heidelberg, Philosophenweg 16, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyInstitut de Recherche en Astrophysique et PlanétologieUniversité St Joseph, Faculty of Sciences, Beirut, LebanonD. SaponeDepartamento de Física, FCFM, Universidad de Chile, Blanco Encalada 2008, Santiago, ChileB. SartorisUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstrasse 1, 81679 München, GermanyINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyJ. A. SchewtschenkoInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UKP. SchneiderUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, GermanyT. SchrabbackUniversität Innsbruck, Institut für Astro- und Teilchenphysik, Technikerstr. 25/8, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaA. SecrounAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Marseille, FranceE. SefusattiINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the Universe, via Beirut 2, 34151 Trieste, ItalyINFN, Sezione di Trieste, Via Valerio 2, 34127 Trieste TS, ItalyG. SeidelMax-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, 69117 Heidelberg, GermanyM. SeiffertJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA, 91109, USAS. SerranoInstitut d'Estudis Espacials de CatalunyaSatlantis, University Science Park, Sede Bld 48940, Leioa-Bilbao, SpainInstitute of Space SciencesP. SimonUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie, Auf dem Hügel 71, 53121 Bonn, GermanyC. SirignanoDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "G. Galilei", Università di Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyINFN-Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyG. SirriINFN-Sezione di Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat 6/2, 40127 Bologna, ItalyA. Spurio ManciniDepartment of Physics, Royal Holloway, University of London, TW20 0EX, UKL. StancoINFN-Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, ItalyJ. SteinwagnerMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyD. TavagnaccoINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyA. N. TaylorInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal Observatory, Blackford Hill, Edinburgh EH9 3HJ, UKH. I. TeplitzInfrared Processing and Analysis Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USAI. TerenoDepartamento de Física, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Edifício C8, Campo Grande, PT1749-016 Lisboa, PortugalInstituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do Espaço, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-018 Lisboa, PortugalN. TessoreDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UKS. ToftCosmic Dawn CenterNiels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 128, 2200 Copenhagen, DenmarkR. Toledo-MoreoUniversidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Departamento de Electrónica y Tecnología de Computadoras, Plaza del Hospital 1, 30202 Cartagena, SpainF. TorradeflotPort d'Informació Científica, Campus UAB, C. Albareda s/n, 08193 BellaterraCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y TecnológicasA. TsyganovCentre for Information Technology, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 11044, 9700 CA Groningen, The NetherlandsI. TutusausInstitut de Recherche en Astrophysique et PlanétologieL. ValenzianoINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Bologna, Via Irnerio 46, 40126 Bologna, ItalyJ. ValiviitaDepartment of Physics, P.O. Box 64, 00014 University of Helsinki, FinlandHelsinki Institute of Physics, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandT. VassalloUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstrasse 1, 81679 München, GermanyINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalyG. Verdoes KleijnKapteyn Astronomical Institute, University of Groningen, PO Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The NetherlandsY. WangInfrared Processing and Analysis Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USAJ. WellerUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Scheinerstrasse 1, 81679 München, GermanyMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, Giessenbachstr. 1, 85748 Garching, GermanyG. ZamoraniINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyE. ZuccaINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyM. BolzonellaINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Via Piero Gobetti 93/3, 40129 Bologna, ItalyC. BuriganaINAF, Istituto di Radioastronomia, Via Piero Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, ItalyINFN-Bologna, Via Irnerio 46, 40126 Bologna, ItalyL. GabarraDepartment of Physics, Oxford University, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UKJ. Martín-FleitasAurora Technology for European Space AgencyI. RissoINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via Brera 28, 20122 Milano, Italy, and INFN-Sezione di Genova, Via Dodecaneso 33, 16146, Genova, ItalyV. ScottezInstitut d'Astrophysique de Paris, 98bis Boulevard Arago, 75014, Paris, FranceICL, Junia, Université Catholique de Lille, LITL, 59000 Lille, FranceM. VielIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the Universe, via Beirut 2, 34151 Trieste, ItalyINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, 34143 Trieste, ItalySISSA, International School for Advanced Studies, Via Bonomea 265, 34136 Trieste TS, ItalyINFN, Sezione di Trieste, Via Valerio 2, 34127 Trieste TS, ItalyICSC - Centro Nazionale di Ricerca in High Performance Computing, Big Data e Quantum Computing, Via Magnanelli 2, Bologna, Italy10.1051/0004-6361/202555551http://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28275v1Dark Matter Interpretation of the Super-Kamiokande Antineutrino Excess in $\mathrm{U}(1)_{L_μ-L_τ}$ model2026-05-27T10:20:23ZRecent Super-Kamiokande analyses of the diffuse supernova neutrino background, based on data across all SK phases, indicate a mild preference over the zero-DSNB hypothesis at the level of about $2.3σ$ with electron-like antineutrino events at $E_{\barν_e} \simeq 20\,\mathrm{MeV}$. We investigate whether this excess can be explained by MeV-scale dark matter annihilation into neutrinos in a $\mathrm{U}(1)_{L_μ- L_τ}$ model. The dark matter is a Dirac fermion with $m_χ\simeq 22\,\mathrm{MeV}$ that annihilates via a light $Z'$ mediator into $ν_μ\barν_μ$ and $ν_τ\barν_τ$, which are partly converted into $\barν_e$ through flavor oscillations. We find that this scenario simultaneously accounts for the excess and the observed relic abundance via thermal freeze-out. We further discuss the relevant laboratory and cosmological constraints, including neutrino trident production, NA64-$μ$, Borexino, and the contribution to $ΔN_\mathrm{eff}$.2026-05-27T10:20:23Z9 pages, 2 figuresMotoi EndoYushi MuraTenta Tsujihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28248v1Using the Pericentre Precession of LAGEOS II to Constrain Quadratically Coupled Ultralight Dark Matter2026-05-27T09:59:04ZIt has been proposed that feebly interacting ultralight scalars may constitute the dark matter content of the universe. Models describing the interactions of a dark matter scalar with Standard Model fields may feature quadratic interactions at leading order, such that the scalar acquires an effective mass in the neighbourhood of a classical matter distribution. The effect of their introduction is to provide effective shifts in fundamental constants of physics, as well as to mediate scalar fifth forces between test bodies. We here demonstrate how these fifth forces can result in pericentre precession in the orbital motion of satellites around the Earth. We apply this to the measured pericentre precession of the LAGEOS II experiment, constraining the mass, and couplings to the light Standard Model fields, of a quadratically coupled ultra-light dark matter scalar. We observe such an experiment to be effective in constraining parameter space at strong couplings, where existing constraints from satellite and tabletop level experiments break down.2026-05-27T09:59:04Z36 pages, 7 figuresClare BurrageAngus MacdonaldElisa Todarellohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.15893v2Probing the faint end of simulated galaxy counts at z>32026-05-27T09:52:23ZSimulations and observations now probe comparable redshift regimes with unprecedented accuracy, enabling direct consistency tests through forward modeling. In a previous work, we identified a faint-end discrepancy between observed and simulated near-infrared galaxy counts in CANDELS GOODS-South. Here we investigate whether this tension originates from the forward-modeling procedure or from limitations of the underlying simulations, and we characterize the galaxy populations responsible for the tension. Using the FORECAST forward-modeling code, we generated ten independent light-cone realizations and mock CANDELS images from the TNG100 and EAGLE simulations. We compared both the intrinsic light-cone catalogs and the mock-image detections with observations, testing dependencies on field and redshift, and validating the pipeline through stellar mass and multi-band analyses. The faint-end deficit is present in all CANDELS fields and appears at z>3 in both simulations. GOODS-South counts corrected for completeness exceed intrinsic simulation counts already at the 50% completeness limit, indicating that the missing population is not simply hidden below the detection threshold. Increasing the depth of mock images recovers the counts near the peak but overpredicts the faintest sources, showing that depth alone cannot resolve the discrepancy. Structural analyses reveal that compact galaxies with bright central cores observed in GOODS-South are underproduced in simulations, which instead favor diffuse low-surface-brightness systems. We conclude that the discrepancy arises both from detection losses of diffuse galaxies and, more fundamentally, from the inability of current hydrodynamical simulations to produce enough faint compact galaxies at z>3. This tension points to the need for improved modeling of early star formation, feedback, and dust treatment.2026-05-15T12:22:12Z18 pages, 12 figures, 2 tablesFlaminia FortuniEmiliano MerlinMarco CastellanoAdriano FontanaPaola Santinihttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.05720v2Early-universe constraints on the electron mass2026-05-27T09:01:52ZWe investigate the impact of a nonstandard electron mass $m_e$ on early-Universe thermal history, focusing on neutrino decoupling and Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN). In the standard cosmology, neutrino--electron interactions keep neutrinos in thermal contact with the electromagnetic plasma until shortly before $e^\pm$ annihilation. Varying $m_e$ shifts the decoupling epoch and the entropy transfer from $e^\pm$ annihilation, thereby modifying the neutrino energy density and the inferred effective number of relativistic species, $N_{\mathrm{eff}}$. Independently, during BBN the rates of charged-current weak processes, and hence the neutron-to-proton ratio, depend on $m_e$. By confronting BBN predictions for the primordial light-element abundances with observations and imposing cosmological constraints on $N_{\mathrm{eff}}$, we obtain the following $1σ$ bounds on $m_e$ in the early Universe: $m_e = 0.505^{+0.006}_{-0.007}$ MeV (for the NACRE II nuclear reaction network) or $m_e=0.509^{+0.005}_{-0.004}$ MeV (for the PRIMAT nuclear reaction network). These bounds have been derived by adopting the recent determination of the primordial Helium-4 abundance by the Large Binocular Telescope observations of 54 metal-poor H\,\textsc{ii} regions. If instead we adopt the Particle Data Book Helium-4 abundance, the bounds are: $m_e = 0.503^{+0.011}_{-0.015}$ MeV (NACRE II) or $m_e=0.521^{+0.009}_{-0.007}$ MeV (PRIMAT) The obtained allowed ranges are close to the present laboratory value at the level of $\sim 0.4\%-2\%$, depending on the dataset and nuclear network, thus supporting the constancy of the electron mass over cosmological timescales.2026-02-05T14:47:25Z15 pages, 11 figures, 1 table. Accepted for publication in PRDMichela GarramoneStefano GariazzoNicolao Fornengohttp://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13945v2Probing Quadratically Coupled Ultralight Dark Matter with Pulsar Timing Arrays2026-05-27T08:56:37ZUltralight dark matter may couple quadratically to Standard Model particles. Such quadratic interactions give rise to both coherent and stochastic signals in pulsar timing array (PTA) observations. In this work, we characterize these signals, including the effects of dark matter propagation in a finite-density medium, and assess the sensitivity of current and upcoming PTA observations to their detection. For coherent signals, we find that the sensitivity of current PTA observations competes with and sometimes exceeds that of other probes, such as equivalence principle tests and atomic clocks. For stochastic signals, we find that PTA sensitivities underperform equivalence principle constraints for both existing and upcoming PTA data sets.2025-10-15T18:00:00Z26 pages, 2 appendices, 6 figures; v2: minor improvements to the text, references added, results and conclusions unchangedPhys. Rev. D 113, 063034 (2026)Xucheng GanHyungjin KimAndrea Mitridate10.1103/15g1-gklxhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05436v2Constraints on DBI dark energy with chameleon mechanism2026-05-27T07:37:45ZIn this work, we investigate the Dirac--Born--Infeld (DBI) scalar field model with and without the inclusion of the chameleon mechanism in light of the latest cosmological observations. We constrain the model using data from Pantheon Plus, DES Y5, DESI DR2, and the compressed Planck likelihood. We consider an AdS throat of the form $f(φ) = λ/ φ^4$ and a potential $V(φ) = m_0^2 φ^2 + m_1^2 φ^4$. Our analysis shows that, for both cases, the mean value $m_1 \simeq 0$ suggests that the DBI field may lack significant self-interaction, with only an upper bound on $m_1$. The warp parameter is constrained to $η\geq 0$, while the chameleon coupling satisfies $β\leq 0$. No crossing of the phantom divide is observed under the assumed form of the warp factor and potential. We perform a statistical model comparison using the $Δ\mathrm{AIC}$ relative to the $Λ$CDM model. Although the DBI model provides a slightly better fit to the data in terms of $Δχ^2$, the improvement is negligible. Consequently, the DBI model is mildly disfavored for both the cases compared to the $Λ$CDM model.2025-08-07T14:25:53Z10 pages 8 figuresBurin GumjudpaiNandan RoyJohn Wardhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28054v1Fermionic Bubble Loop in Cosmological Collider Revisited: Exact signals from spectral and Mellin-Barnes methods2026-05-27T06:59:43ZFermionic degrees of freedom are essential ingredients in cosmological collider physics and are well motivated by many phenomenological models beyond the Standard Model, but their signals remain largely unexplored due to the difficulty of computing loop diagrams. In this work, we ask how fermionic bubble loops contribute to cosmological collider signals and provide an exact answer for arbitrary couplings. We develop two parallel analytical methods whose agreement provides a non-trivial check of the result. The first method is similar in spirit to spectral decomposition and is built directly from an identity for the product of propagators, which turns the bubble signal into an infinite sum of tree-level exchange signals. The second method is based on the Mellin-Barnes representation, where the result is reconstructed from the residues of distinct families of poles. We also show that the fermionic bubble can be generated from the scalar bubble by the action of appropriate differential operators. As a phenomenologically important application, we consider Yukawa interactions between fermions and the inflaton, finding that the resulting bispectrum signal vanishes identically. Through the spectral decomposition, this vanishing can be traced to a field redefinition of the associated tree-level counterparts.2026-05-27T06:59:43Z60 pages, 4 figuresShuntaro AokiZhehan QinMasahide YamaguchiYuhang Zhuhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.28005v1Transient axion streams from disrupted miniclusters2026-05-27T05:56:34ZWe investigate the formation and evolution of axion streams generated by the tidal disruption of axion miniclusters through stellar encounters in the Milky Way halo. Combining a large-scale Monte Carlo treatment of repeated stellar flybys with a tracer reconstruction of the stripped debris, we follow the phase-space evolution of the streams across a broad range of galactocentric radii and assess their contribution to the local dark matter distribution. We find that the kinetic energy of the stripped debris typically exceeds its residual self-gravitational binding energy at formation, so that the subsequent evolution is dominated by anisotropic free expansion and orbital shear. As a result, stream densities can decrease by factors as large as $\sim10^{-9}$ over Galactic timescales, strongly suppressing the steady-state abundance of dense streams near the Solar circle. At the Solar radius, only a small fraction of realizations yields a nonzero encounter probability over a 10 year exposure, implying that observable streams are dominated by rare recent and nearby disruption events rather than by a persistent population of long-lived overdense substructure. Despite this rapid dilution, the streams remain dynamically cold and produce detector-frame linewidths many orders of magnitude narrower than the cavity bandwidths of current haloscope experiments. For representative haloscope configurations, we find characteristic stream linewidths in the range $Δν_{\rm stream}\sim10^{-7}-10^{1}\,{\rm Hz}$, while the corresponding Doppler drift remains well below the cavity response width.2026-05-27T05:56:34Z11 pages, 10 figuresLuca VisinelliMomchil Naydenovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2505.23768v2Turbulence in Primordial Dark Matter Halos and Its Impact on the First Star Formation2026-05-27T05:52:00ZWe present high-resolution simulations of the first star-forming clouds in 15 minihalos with masses ranging from $\sim 10^5$ to $10^7\ \text{M}_{\odot}$ at redshifts $z \sim 17-20$, using the GIZMO code. Our simulations incorporate detailed primordial gas physics and adopt initial conditions from the state-of-the-art TNG cosmological simulations. To achieve the required resolution, we apply a particle-splitting technique that increases the resolution of the original TNG data by a factor of $\sim 10^5$, reaching gas and dark matter particle masses of $0.2\ \text{M}_{\odot}$ and $80\ \text{M}_{\odot}$, respectively. This enables us to resolve gas accretion during the early assembly of minihalos and to capture the emergence of strong turbulent flows. We find that turbulence, driven by gas infall into the dark matter potential wells, is predominantly supersonic, with characteristic Mach numbers ranging from $1.8$ to $4.2$, increasing with halo mass. The supersonic turbulence effectively fragments the central gas cloud into multiple clumps. Some of dense clump masses range from $2.6~\text{M}_{\odot}$ to $66.5~\text{M}_{\odot}$ exceeding their corresponding Jeans masses and soon collapsing to form the first stars. Our results suggest that supersonic turbulence is a common feature in minihalos and plays a key role in generating clumpy star-forming clouds, with important implications for the initial mass function of the first stars.2025-05-29T17:59:58Z19 pages, 12 figures. Accepted to ApJMeng-Yuan HoKe-Jung ChenPei-Cheng Tunghttp://arxiv.org/abs/2602.15058v2May Negative Mass Objects exist in the sky?2026-05-27T05:29:23ZWe conjecture the possibility of negative mass objects (NMOs) existing in the sky. It is shown that they may not be so exotic as usually expected. We show that NMOs appear as solutions of standard gravitational equations if we consider the system of a compact positive mass object, cosmological fluid and negative cosmological constant. We also construct models which generate such NMOs as solutions within the two-scalar theory and scalar-Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet gravity inspired by string theory. The orbits of the photon and massive particles are investigated in the background, where there is a negative mass object which realises a kind of effective anti-gravity. It is explicitly found that the bound system consisting of a positive mass object and a negative mass object can be formed in spite that a positive mass object suffers the repulsive force from the NMO. The possibility that such exotic objects might be observed is discussed. A simple conjecture about their possible masses is made, too. As an even more exotic object, we consider a non-trivial object with vanishing mass and investigate its properties.2026-02-13T07:25:30ZLaTeX 20 pages, to appear in Physics of the Dark UniverseShin'ichi NojiriS. D. Odintsovhttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27973v1Dynamical Resolution of the Cosmic Coincidence Problem in Non-Interacting Holographic Dark Energy via Einstein-Cartan Torsion2026-05-27T05:10:11ZWe investigate the cosmic coincidence problem in non-interacting holographic dark energy with the Hubble radius as the infrared cutoff in Einstein-Cartan gravity. In general relativity, this cutoff gives a dust-like equation of state in the non-interacting case, whereas interacting models require a phenomenological dark sector coupling and yield a constant density ratio. We show that the Einstein-Cartan torsion scalar $Φ$, compatible with the cosmological principle, with the self-consistent scaling behavior $Φ\sim a^{-3}$, makes the density ratio $r\equiv ρ_m/ρ_X$ dynamical even when the phenomenological interaction term is absent, $Q=0$. The same torsion contribution shifts the equation of state for holographic dark energy toward negative values, allowing cosmic acceleration, and realizes the observed order-unity density ratio within the weak torsion regime without tuning the holographic free parameter. Thus, Einstein-Cartan torsion provides a geometric mechanism that replaces the phenomenological dark sector interaction and offers a dynamical resolution of the cosmic coincidence problem.2026-05-27T05:10:11Z5 pages, 2 figuresYongjun YunKyungduk KimJungjai Leehttp://arxiv.org/abs/2605.27727v1Reconstructing ACT-compatible and GW170817-compatible Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet Inflation from the Observational Indices2026-05-26T22:02:09ZIn this work we use an inverse reconstruction technique for constructing ACT-compatible and GW170817-compatible Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet inflationary theories. From a given tensor-to-scalar ratio using the reconstruction technique, we find which scalar Gauss-Bonnet coupling function and which scalar potential can yield the given tensor-to-scalar ratio. We present the formalism and the viable theories pass a series of observational tests, including the amplitude of the scalar perturbations, which is non-trivial for Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet theories. We present four viable models of inflation that pass all the observational tests.2026-05-26T22:02:09ZAoP in pressAnnals Phys. 492 (2026) 170547V. K. Oikonomou10.1016/j.aop.2026.170547http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21292v2Evolution of Cosmic Voids: Structure, Galaxies, and Dynamics2026-05-26T20:51:28ZWe investigate the structural, photometric, and dynamical evolution of cosmic voids and their galaxy populations from $z=2.09$ to the present, focusing on void size as a key evolutionary parameter. Using void catalogs from four Millennium Simulation snapshots and SDSS data at $z<0.04$, we perform a unified analysis of void demographics, galaxy properties, and internal kinematics. Our analysis reveals clear evidence that cosmic voids exhibit a significant evolutionary trend of becoming progressively emptier toward low redshift, accompanied by a marked decline in the brightness and clustering of their galaxy populations. The void galaxy luminosity function evolves significantly: $M^{*}$ fades and $α$ flattens with time, with large voids hosting brighter, more rapidly evolving galaxies than small voids. Stacked density profiles exhibit a universal shape when scaled by void radius, deepening and building more pronounced walls toward $z=0$. Galaxy spatial distributions reveal persistent size-dependent segregation, with galaxies in large voids lying farther from the center and more strongly clustered. Dynamical analysis of simulations shows coherent outward flows in all voids, with amplitudes decreasing toward $z=0$, providing a physical basis for observed redshift-space distortions. Comparison with SDSS broadly confirms these evolutionary trends but uncovers a non-zero central galaxy population in observed voids -- absent in $Λ$CDM predictions -- that may challenge current galaxy formation models in extreme underdensities. Future comparisons with additional simulations and deeper high-redshift surveys will provide stronger tests of $Λ$CDM in the most underdense regions.2026-02-24T19:00:06ZAccepted for publication in ApJ. This version includes the final revisions after peer reviewSaeed Tavasoli